Int J Sports Med 2008; 29(2): 151-157
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-965116
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Influence of Instructions on Perceptually-Based Ratings

J. B. J. Coquart1 , P. Raul1 , M. Garcin1
  • 1University Lille 2, FSSEP, Ronchin, France
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision December 28, 2006

Publication Date:
13 September 2007 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the expected running duration or distance on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and estimated time limit (ETL) values. Thirty-nine males performed an incremental test to measure their maximal aerobic velocity (MAV). Then, the subjects realised a constant velocity test (90 % MAV) to determine their time limit (Tlim) and distance limit (Dlim). Three homogenous groups were made up. Subsequently, all the groups performed 2 similar tests: a test at 90 % MAV for 80 % Tlim and a test at 90 % MAV for 80 % Dlim, each group with different instructions: group 1 (G1) was expected to maintain the velocity for 60 % Tlim (and Dlim), while group 2 (G2) and group 3 (G3) received instructions to maintain this velocity for 80 and 100 % Tlim (and Dlim), respectively. During these tests, RPE and ETL values were collected and compared by using a three-way repeated measures ANOVA. The statistical analysis revealed no significant group or test effect on RPE and ETL (p > .05). As a consequence, in this present study, it seems that the exercise instructions have not influenced significantly the hardness of effort (i.e., RPE) and the subjective estimation of endurance (i.e., ETL).

References

  • 1 Albertus Y, Tucker R, Clair Gibson St A, Lambert E, Hampson D, Noakes T. Effect of distance feedback on pacing strategy and perceived exertion during cycling.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;  37 461-468
  • 2 Baden D A, McLean T L, Tucker R, Noakes T D, St Clair Gibson A. Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function.  Br J Sports Med. 2005;  39 742-746
  • 3 Baden D A, Warwick-Evans L, Lakomy J. Am I nearly there? The effect of anticipated running distance on perceived exertion and attentional focus.  J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;  27 215-231
  • 4 Berthoin S, Gerbeaux M, Turpin E, Guerrin F, Lensel-Corbeil G, Vandendorpe F. Comparison of two field tests to estimate maximum aerobic speed.  J Sports Sci. 1994;  12 355-362
  • 5 Billat V L, Koralsztein J-P. Significance of the velocity at V·O2max and time to exhaustion at this velocity.  Sports Med. 1996;  22 90-108
  • 6 Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;  2 92-98
  • 7 Borg (ed) G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign; Human Kinetics 1998
  • 8 Bosquet L, Leger L, Legros P. Methods to determine aerobic endurance.  Sports Med. 2002;  32 675-700
  • 9 Demello J, Cureton K, Boineau R, Singh M. Ratings of the perceived exertion at the lactate threshold in trained and untrained men and women.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;  19 354-362
  • 10 Dunbar C, Robertson R, Baun R, Blandin M, Metz K, Burdett R, Goss F. The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;  24 94-99
  • 11 Eston R, Davies B, Williams J. Use of perceived effort ratings to control exercise intensity in young healthy adults.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987;  56 222-224
  • 12 Garcin M, Billat V. Perceived exertion scales attest to both intensity and exercise duration.  Percept Mot Skills. 2001;  93 661-671
  • 13 Garcin M, Vandewalle H, Monod H. A new rating scale of perceived exertion based on subjective estimation of exhaustion time.  Int J Sports Med. 1999;  20 40-43
  • 14 Garcin M, Wolff M, Bejma T. Reliability of rating scales of perceived exertion and heart rate during progressive and maximal constant load exercises till exhaustion in physical education students.  Int J Sports Med. 2003;  24 285-290
  • 15 Gearhart R F, Becque M D, Hutchins M D, Palm C M. Comparison of memory and combined exercise and memory anchoring procedures on ratings of perceived exertion during short duration near-peak intensity cycle ergometer exercise.  Percept Mot Skills. 2004;  99 775-784
  • 16 Hampson D B, Clair Gibson St A, Lambert M I, Dugas J P, Lambert E V, Noakes T D. Deception and perceived exertion during high-intensity running bouts.  Percept Mot Skills. 2004;  98 1027-1038
  • 17 Kohl R M, Shea C H. Perceived exertion: influences of locus of control and expected work intensity and duration.  J Hum Mov Stud. 1988;  15 255-272
  • 18 La Caille R A, Masters K S, Heath E M. Effects of cognitive strategy and exercise setting on running performance, perceived exertion, affect, and satisfaction.  Psychol Sport Exerc. 2004;  5 461-476
  • 19 Léger L, Boucher R. An indirect continuous running multistage field test: the University of Montreal Track Test.  Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1980;  5 77-84
  • 20 Morgan W, Borg (ed) G. Mental Health and Emotional Aspects of Sports. Chicago; American Medical Association 1976
  • 21 Morgan W P, Pollock M L. Psychological characteristics of elite runners.  Ann NY Acad Sci. 1977;  301 382-403
  • 22 Nethery V M. Competition between internal and external sources of information during exercise: influence on RPE and the impact of the exercise load.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002;  42 172-178
  • 23 Noble B J, Robertson R J. (eds) .Perceived Exertion. Champaign; Human Kinetics 1996
  • 24 Rejeski J W. The perception of exertion: a social psychophysiological integration.  J Sport Psychol. 1981;  4 305-320
  • 25 Rejeski J W. Perceived exertion: an active or passive process?.  J Sport Psychol. 1985;  7 371-378
  • 26 Rejeski W, Ribisl P. Expected task duration and perceived effort: an attributional analysis.  J Sport Psychol. 1980;  2 227-236
  • 27 Robertson R J. Development of the perceived exertion knowledge base: an interdisciplinary process.  Int J Sport Psychol. 2001;  32 189-196
  • 28 Robertson R, Noble B. Perception of physical exertion: methods, mediators and applications.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997;  25 407-452
  • 29 Shephard R, Vandewalle H, Gil V, Bouhlel E, Monod H. Respiratory, muscular and overall perceptions of effort: the influence of hypoxia and muscle mass.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;  24 556-567
  • 30 St Clair Gibson A, Lambert E V, Lambert M I, Hampson D B, Noakes T D. Exercise and fatigue control mechanisms.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 1-14
  • 31 St Clair Gibson A, Noakes T D. Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans.  Br J Sports Med. 2004;  38 797-806
  • 32 Ulmer H V. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback.  Experientia. 1996;  52 416-420
  • 33 Williamson J W, Mc Coll R, Mathews D, Mitchell J H, Raven P B, Morgan W P. Hypnotic manipulation of effort sense during dynamic exercise: cardiovascular responses and brain activation.  J Appl Physiol. 2001;  90 1392-1399

Dr. Murielle Garcin

FSSEP
University Lille 2

9 Rue de l'Université

59155 Ronchin

France

Phone: + 33 3 20 88 73 91

Fax: + 33 3 20 88 73 63

Email: murielle.garcin@univ-lille2.fr

    >