Literatur
- 1
American Society of Anaesthesiologists .
Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non- anaesthesiologists: a
report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation
and Analgesia by Non-Anaesthesiologists.
Anaesthesiology.
1996;
84
459-471
- 2
Smith M R, Bell G D, Fulton B. et al .
A comparison of winged steel needles and Teflon cannulas in maintaining intravenous
access during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1993;
39
33-36
- 3
American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy .
Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopes.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
317-322
- 4
American Society of Anaesthesiologists .
Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anaesthesiologists: a
report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation
and Analgesia by Non-Anaesthesiologists.
Anaesthesiology.
1996;
84
459-471
- 5
Daneshmend T K, Bell G D, Logan F R.
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: result of a nationwide survey.
Gut.
1991;
32
12-15
- 6
Keefe E B, O’Connor K W.
1989 ASGE survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1990;
36
S13-S18
- 7
Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Fried M.
Conscious sedation, clinically relevant complications and monitoring of endoscopy:
results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland.
Endoscopy.
1994;
26
231-234
- 8
Quine M A, Bell G D, McCloy R F. et al .
Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England;
Safety, staffing, and sedation methods.
Gut.
1995;
36
462-467
- 9
Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Heisenbach T.
How safe is premedication in ambulatory endoscopy in Germany? A prospective
study in gastroenterology specialty practices.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
2000;
125
1288-1289
- 10
Van Houten J S, Crane S A, Janardan S K, Wells K.
A randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of midazolam (Versed) and
emulsified diazepam (Dizac) for opioid-based, conscious sedation in endoscopic
procedures.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
170-174
- 11
Macken E, Gevers A M, Hendrickx A. et al .
Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy
with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
47
57-61
- 12
Zakko S F, Seifert H A, Gross J B.
A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation during colonoscopy
in a prospective double-blind study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
684-689
- 13
Kostash M A, Johnston R, Bailey R J. et al .
Sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind comparison of diazepam/meperidine,
midazolam/fentanyl and propofol/fentanyl combinations.
Can J Gastroenterol.
1994;
8
27-31
- 14
Diab F H, King P D, Barthel J S. et al .
Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared
with midazolam alone.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
1120-1125
- 15
Schwertner C, Mayr M, Leistert H. et al .
Risks, but no benefits, of a midazolam-fentanyl combination as a premedication
of ERCP [abstract].
Gastroenterology.
1996;
110
A38
- 16
Froehlich F, Thorens J, Schwizer W. et al .
Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory
parameters.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
45
1-9
- 17
Laluna L, Allen M L, Dimarino Jr A J.
The comparison of midazolam and topical lidocaine spray versus the combination
of midazolam, meperidine, and topical lidocaine spray to sedate patients for
upper endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
289-293
- 18
Fisher N C, Bailey S, Gibson J A.
A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient
diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
21-24
- 19
Eckardt V S, Kanzler G, Schmitt T. et al .
Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
560-565
- 20
Rex D K, Imperiale T F, Portish V.
Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors
and results of a randomized controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
554-559
- 21
Ristikankare M, Hartikainen J, Heikkinen M. et al .
Is routinely given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy? Is routinely
given conscious sedation of benefit during colonoscopy?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
566-572
- 22
Terruzzi V, Meucci G, Radaelli F. et al .
Routine versus „on demand” sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: a prospective
randomized controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
169-174
- 23
Sorbi D, Gostout C J, Henry J. et al .
Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional
EGD: a comparative study.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
117
1301-1307
- 24
Garcia R T, Cello J P, Nguyen M H. et al .
Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated
EGD: a multicenter randomized trial.
Gastroenterology.
2003;
125
1606-1612
- 25
Thota P N, Zuccaio Jr G, Vargo 2nd J J. et al .
A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal
and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy
with sedation.
Endoscopy.
2005;
37
559-565
- 26
Liebermann D A, Wuerker C K, Katon R M.
Cardiopulmonary risk of esopagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter
and systemic sedation.
Gastroenterology.
1985;
88
468-472
- 27
Cooper M W, Davison C M, Uastin C A.
Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly
patients: the role of endoscope diameter.
Age Ageing.
1995;
24
254-256
- 28
Patterson K W, Casey P B, Murray J P. et al .
Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison
with midazolam.
Br J Anaesth.
1991;
67
108-111
- 29
Carlsson U, Grattidge P.
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol
and midazolam.
Endoscopy.
1995;
27
240-243
- 30
Meining A, Semmler V, Kassem A M. et al .
The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an
investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam.
Endoscopy.
2007;
7
[Epub ahead of print]
- 31
Wehrmann T, Kokabpick S, Lembcke B. et al .
Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a
prospective, controlled study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
677-683
- 32
Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R. et al .
Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative
to midazolam.
Endoscopy.
2000;
32
233-238
- 33
Vargo J J, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot J A.
Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for
advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial.
Gastroenterology.
2002;
123
8-16
- 34
Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T.
Sedierung mittels Propofol vs. Midazolam/Pethidin bei der ERCP von älteren Hochrisikopatienten.
Endoskopie heute.
2004;
17
69
- 35
Clarke G A, Jacobson B C, Hammet R J. et al .
The indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an
extremely elderly patient cohort.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
580-584
- 36
Seinela L, Ahvenainen J, Ronneikko J. et al .
Reasons for and outcome of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged
85 years or more: retrospective study.
BMJ.
1998;
317
575-580
- 37
Van Kouwen M C, Drenth J P, Verhoeven H M. et al .
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged 85 years or more. Results
of a feasibility study in a district general hospital.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr.
2003;
37
45-50
- 38
Qureshi W A, Zuckermann M J, Adler D G. et al .
ASGE guideline: modifications in endoscopic practice for the elderly.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
566-569
- 39 Muravchick S.
Anesthesia for the geriatric patient. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK (eds) Clinical Anesthesia 4th ed. Philadelphia;
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2001: 1205-1216
- 40
Reimann F M, Samson U, Derad I. et al .
Synergistic sedation with low-dose midazolam and propofol for colonoscopies.
Endoscopy.
2000;
32
239-244
- 41
Seifert H, Schmitt T H, Gultekin T. et al .
Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional
endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2000;
14
1207-1214
- 42
VanNatta M E, Rex D K.
Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with
opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
2209-2217
- 43
Akcaboy Z N, Akcaboy E Y, Albayrak D. et al .
Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored
anesthesia care?.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.
2006;
50
736-741
- 44
Sipe B W, Rex D K, Latinovich D.
Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration
by nurses supervised by endoscopists.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
815-825. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 : 324
- 45
Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J. et al .
Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses
supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more
than 2000 cases.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
57
664-671
- 46
Ehlers A PF, Bitter H.
Delegierung der Propofol-Applikation an Nicht-ärztliches Assistenzpersonal.
Endo heute.
2006;
19
139-143
- 47
Kulling D, Fantin A C, Biro P. et al .
Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol
and alfentanil.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
1-7
- 48
Ng J M, Kong C F, Nyam D.
Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
8-13
- 49 Sauerbruch T, Scheurlen C. Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs-
und Stoffwechselerkrankungen für die Durchführung endoskopischer Untersuchungen. Stuttgart;
Demeter 2002
- 50
American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy .
Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopes.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
317-322
- 51
Froehlich F, Harris J K, Wietliesbach V. et al .
Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational
Study (EPAGE).
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
461-469
- 52
Vargo J J, Zuccaro Jr G, Dumot J AA. et al .
Automated graphic assessment of respiratory activity is superior to pulse oximetry
and visual assessment for the detection of early respiratory depression during
therapeutic upper endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
826-831
- 53
Wehrmann T, Grotkamp J, Stergiou N. et al .
Electroencephalogram monitoring facilitates sedation with propofol for routine
ERCP: a randomized, controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
817-824
- 54
Kortilla K.
Recovery after intravenous sedation. A comparison of clinical and paper and
pencil tests used in assessing late effects of diazepam.
Anaesthesia.
1976;
31
724-731
- 55
Willey J, Vargo J J, Connor J T. et al .
Quantitative assessment of psychomotor recovery after sedation and analgesia
for outpatient EGD.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
810-816
- 56
Riphaus A, Gstettenbauer T, Frenz M B. et al .
Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy:
a randomized and controlled study.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
677-683
- 57
Ogg T W.
An assessment of postoperative outpatient cases.
Br Med J.
1972;
4
573-576
Dr. Andrea Riphaus
Medizinische Klinik I, Krankenhaus Siloah, Klinikum Region Hannover
Roesebeckstraße15
30449 Hannover
Email: ARiphaus@web.de
