ABSTRACT
Gingivoperiosteoplasty creates a mucoperiosteal bridge across the alveolar cleft associated
with cleft lip and palate. The subperiosteal tunnel allows for bone generation in
the absence of bone grafting in young patients. The original procedure required wide
maxillary subperiosteal dissection and flap rotation but has since evolved along with
techniques to narrow the alveolar cleft toward limited dissection and direct closure.
Multiple studies reveal superior facial growth parameters, particularly vertical maxillary
growth, when compared with primary bone grafting typically performed within the first
year of life and a reduced need for later secondary bone grafting. Most centers that
perform gingivoperiosteoplasty do so in conjunction with primary lip closure after
initial narrowing of the cleft with presurgical orthopedics. We present our method
of direct gingivoperiosteoplasty performed simultaneously with palatoplasty after
alveolar cleft narrowing without presurgical orthopedics via a two-stage lip repair.
Preliminary data suggest bone growth capable of supporting tooth eruption without
significant growth disturbances in a majority of patients treated with this protocol.
KEYWORDS
Gingivoperiosteoplasty - periosteoplasty - cleft palate - cleft lip - palatoplasty
- alveolar cleft
REFERENCES
1
Skoog T.
The use of periosteal flaps in the repair of clefts of the primary palate.
Cleft Palate J.
1965;
2
332-339
2
Skoog T.
The use of periosteum and surgicel for bone restoration in congenital clefts of the
maxilla. A clinical report and experimental investigation.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.
1967;
1
113-130
3
Ritsila V, Alhopuro S, Gylling U, Rintala A.
The use of free periosteum for bone formation in congenital clefts of the maxilla.
A preliminary report.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.
1972;
6
57-60
4
Ritsila V, Alhopuro S, Rintala A.
Bone formation with free periosteal grafts in reconstruction of congenital maxillary
clefts.
Ann Chir Gynaecol.
1976;
65
342-344
5
Rintala A E, Ranta R.
Periosteal flaps and grafts in primary cleft repair: a follow-up study.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1989;
83
17-22
6
Massei A.
Reconstruction of cleft maxilla with periosteoplasty.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.
1986;
20
41-44
7
Millard D R, Latham R A.
Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1990;
86
856-871
8
Ross B.
Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Cleft Palate J.
1987;
24
3-89
9
Brattstrom V, Mcwilliam J, Larson O, Semb G.
Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus,
and palate treated according to four different regimes. I. Maxillary development.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.
1991;
25
259-267
10
Smahel Z, Mullerova Z, Horak I.
Facial development in unilateral cleft lip and palate prior to the eruption of permanent
incisors after primary bone grafting and periosteal flap surgery.
Acta Chir Plast.
1996;
38
30-36
11
Grisius T M, Spolyar J, Jackson I T et al..
Assessment of cleft lip and palate patients treated with presurgical orthopedic correction
and either primary bone grafts, gingivoperiosteoplasty, or without alveolar grafting
procedure.
J Craniofac Surg.
2006;
17
468-473
12
Sameshima G T, Smahel Z.
Facial growth in adulthood after primary periosteoplasty or primary bone grafting
in UCLP.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J.
2000;
37
379-384
13
Murthy A S, Lehman J A.
Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J.
2005;
42
99-101
14
Smahel Z, Mullerova Z.
Effects of primary periosteoplasty on facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate:
10-year follow-up.
Cleft Palate J.
1988;
25
356-361
15
Sameshima G T, Banh D S, Smahel Z, Melnick M.
Facial growth after primary periosteoplasty versus primary bone grafting in unilateral
cleft lip and palate.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J.
1996;
33
300-305
16
Wood R J, Grayson B H, Cutting C B.
Gingivoperiosteoplasty and midfacial growth.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J.
1997;
34
17-20
17
Lukash F N, Schwartz M, Grauer S, Tuminelli F.
Dynamic cleft maxillary orthopedics and periosteoplasty: benefit or detriment?.
Ann Plast Surg.
1998;
40
321-326
18
Lee C TH, Grayson B H, Cutting C B et al..
Prepubertal midface growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate following alveolar molding
and gingivoperiosteoplasty.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J.
2004;
41
375-380
19
Santiago P E, Grayson B H, Cutting C B et al..
Reduced need for alveolar bone grafting by presurgical orthopedics and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J.
1997;
35
77-80
20
Renkielska A, Wojtaszek-Slominska A, Dobke M.
Early cleft lip repair in children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.
A case against primary alveolar repair.
Ann Plast Surg.
2005;
54
595-597
21
Berkowitz S, Mejia M, Bystrik A.
A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative
approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete
cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;
113
1-18
22
Tomanova M, Mullerova Z.
Growth of the dental arch in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate
after primary periosteoplasty.
Acta Chir Plast.
1994;
36
119-123
23
Hellquist R, Svardstrom K, Ponten B.
A longitudinal study of delayed periosteoplasty to the cleft alveolus.
Cleft Palate J.
1983;
20
277-288
24
Smith W P, Markus A F, Delaire J.
Primary closure of the cleft alveolus: a functional approach.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
1995;
33
156-165
25
Brusati R, Mannucci N.
The early gingivoalveoloplasty. Preliminary results.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.
1992;
26
65-70
Sherard A TatumM.D.
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York,
Upstate Medical University
750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210