Neuropediatrics 1992; 23(2): 82-91
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071318
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Maturation of Set-Modulation of Lower Extremity EMG Responses to Postural Perturbations*

K.  Müller1* , V.  Hömberg2 , P.  Coppenrath1 , H. G. Lenard1
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstraße 5, D-4000 Düsseldorf 1
  • 2Neurological Therapy Center, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstraße 5, D-4000 Düsseldorf 1
* This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Federal Republic of Germany (0706560) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 200, B9)
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 March 2008 (online)

Abstract

To analyse the influence of different "postural sets" on stance stabilizing EMG responses in children, EMG responses to toe-up tilt perturbations were recorded in 70 children between the age of 9 months and 10 years, as well as in a control group of 10 adults under different postural set conditions, using either bilateral destabilization with eyes opened, eyes closed, or introducing additional minute upper extremity support. Recordings were also made with the children seated in front of the platform with the ankle joint angle being identical to that in the standing condition. Also recordings were made after unilateral destabilization in bilateral lower leg muscles, to determine if there is a generalization of EMG response patterns to the mechanically not disturbed side.

Across all age-groups the principal modulation of EMG response changes according to postural conditions was identical. Long latency (LL) EMG responses were down-regulated when additional upper extremity support was provided. LL-responses were abolished in the sitting condition. With unilateral destabilizations throughout all age-groups short latency responses were restricted to the perturbed side, whereas long latency responses could be obtained symmetrically. The proximal to distal gradient of recruitment of muscle groups, remained identical across all age-groups.

The data indicate that the basic organizational principle of stance stabilizing EMG responses and their modification by postural sets remains invariant across development. This indicates that the involved organizational principles are present as soon as a child is able to stand upright and are not subject to further shaping by motor learning.

    >