Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2009; 101(03): 419-421
DOI: 10.1160/TH08-12-0790
Editorial Focus
Schattauer GmbH

Precision and accuracy of CoaguChek S and XS monitors: The need for external quality assessment

Leon Poller
European Action on Anticoagulation (EAA), Central Facility, The University of Manchester, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 04 December 2008

Accepted: 04 February 2008

Publication Date:
15 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • References

  • 1 Braun S, Watzke H, Hasenkam JM. et al. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 310-314.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Connock M, Stevens C, Fry-Smith A. et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of managing long-term oral anticoagulation therapy: a systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technology Assessment 2007; 11: 41-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hirsh J. Guidelines for antithrombotic therapy. Eighth Edition 2008. BC Decker Inc; Hamilton: p. 14.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Christensen TD, Larsen TB, Jensen C. et al. International Normalized Ratio (INR) measured on the CoaguChek S and XS compared with the laboratory using repeated measurements for determination of precision and accuracy. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 563-569.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Williams VK, Griffiths AB. Acceptability of CoaguChek S and CoaguChek XS generated international normalised ratios against a laboratory standard in a paediatric setting. Pathology 2007; 39: 575-579.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bauman ME, Black KL, Massicotte MP. et al. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-ofcare international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99: 1097-1103.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Karon BS, McBane RD, Chaudhry R. et al. Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 88-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bereznicki LR, Jackson SL, Peterson GM. et al. Accuracy and clinical utility of the CoaguChek XS portable international normalised ratio monitor in a pilot study of warfarin home-monitoring. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60: 311-314.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nam MH, Roh KH, Pak HN. et al. Evaluation of the Roche CoaguChek XS handheld coagulation analyzer in a cardiac outpatient clinic. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2008; 38: 37-40.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Poller L, Keown M, Ibrahim SA. et al. Quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care prothrombin time monitors: comparison of the European Community-approved procedure and conventional external quality assessment. Clin Chem 2006; 52: 1843-1847.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Meijer P, Kluft C, Poller L. et al. A national field study of quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors. Am J Clin Path 2006; 126: 756-761.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar