Thromb Haemost 2011; 106(05): 934-938
DOI: 10.1160/TH11-04-0273
Platelets and Blood Cells
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluating the role for the optical density in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia following cardiac surgery

Chee M. Chan
1   Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
,
Paul J. Corso
2   Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
,
Xiumei Sun
2   Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
,
Peter C. Hill
2   Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
,
Andrew F. Shorr
1   Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received:27. April 2011

Accepted after major revision: 22. Juli 2011

Publikationsdatum:
23. November 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

The poor accuracy of the enzyme immune assay (EIA) contributes to the diagnostic challenge of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) following cardiac surgery. We sought to determine if adjusting the threshold optical density (OD) defining a positive EIA improves the test's accuracy in subjects with an OD>0.40. We retrospectively analysed the results from both EIA and confirmatory serotonin release assays (SRAs) in cardiac surgery patients with EIA OD of >0.4. Employing the SRA as the standard, we compared the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of various OD measurements for identifying HIT. We examined baseline clinical variables associated with a positive SRA in the setting of a positive HIT EIA (OD >0.4). We then used logistic regression to identify baseline clinical variables independently associated with a positive SRA given a positive EIA. The cohort included 99 subjects with positive EIAs and 35% had positive SRAs. An OD>0.40 had moderate utility as a screening test for a positive SRA (AUROC: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55–0.80). Increasing the OD threshold did not improve the HIT EIA's screening utility. Clinical variables independently associated with a positive SRA if the EIA were positive included female gender, absence of diabetes, and use of cardiopulmonary bypass. A relatively modest elevation in the OD measurement, when it is already known to be greater than 0.4, does not reliably exclude the potential for a positive SRA in this setting.