Thromb Haemost 2013; 109(01): 137-145
DOI: 10.1160/TH12-07-0473
New Technologies, Diagnostic Tools and Drugs
Schattauer GmbH

Accuracy of emergency physician–performed ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Fulvio Pomero

    1   Department of Clinical Medicine, ASO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
  • Francesco Dentali

    2   Department of Clinical Medicine Insubria University, Varese, Italy
  • Valentina Borretta

    1   Department of Clinical Medicine, ASO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
  • Matteo Bonzini

    3   Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Research Center, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
  • Remo Melchio

    1   Department of Clinical Medicine, ASO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
  • James D. Douketis

    4   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Luigi Maria Fenoglio

    1   Department of Clinical Medicine, ASO S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 July 2012

Accepted after minor revision: 14 September 2012

Publication Date:
25 November 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

Duplex ultrasound is the first-line diagnostic test for detecting lower limb deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) but it is time consuming, requires patient transport, and cannot be interpreted by most physicians. The accuracy of emergency physician–performed ultrasound (EPPU) for the diagnosis of DVT, when performed at the bedside, is unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, aiming to provide reliable data on the accuracy of EPPU in the diagnosis of DVT. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to August 2012) were systematically searched for studies evaluating the accuracy of EPPU compared to either colour-flow duplex ultrasound performed by a radiology department or vascular laboratory, or to angiography, in the diagnosis of DVT. Weighted mean sensitivity and specificity and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects regression approach. There were 16 studies included, with 2,379 patients. The pooled prevalence of DVT was 23.1% (498 in 2,379 patients), ranging from 7.4% to 47.3%. Using the bivariate approach, the weighted mean sensitivity of EPPU compared to the reference imaging test was 96.1% (95%CI 90.6–98.5%), and with a weighted mean specificity of 96.8% (95%CI:94.6–98.1%). Our findings suggest that EPPU may be useful in the management of patients with suspected DVT. Future prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.