Thromb Haemost 2014; 111(04): 662-669
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-04-0289
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Haemodialysis impairs clopidogrel but not aspirin responsiveness in patients with end-stage renal disease

Results of a pilot study
Patrik Htun
1   Zentralklinikum Augsburg, Zentrale Notaufnahme und Medizinische Klinik IV, Augsburg, Germany
,
Tatiana Kan
2   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
,
Eda Mueller
2   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
,
Cosima Pohle
3   KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V., KfH-Nierenzentrum Berlin, Germany
,
Ralf Schindler
4   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
,
Tobias Geisler
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
,
Meinrad Gawaz
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
,
Wolfgang Bocksch
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
,
Suzanne Fateh-Moghadam
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 April 2013

Accepted after major revision: 26 October 2013

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin (ASA) and clopidogrel (Clp) is the standard treatment to reduce ischaemic coronary events, but in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) the efficacy of Clp remains unclear. Patients with ESRD are at higher risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) and also their post-interventional outcome is worse compared to patients with normal renal function. Little is known about the influence of haemodialysis (HD) on ASA and Clp responsiveness. To assess the effect of HD on ASA- and Clp-responsiveness in patients with documented CAD and ESRD, 31 patients with ESRD (mean age 66.5 ± 1.8 years, 23 male ) on DAPT were evaluated for their ASA and Clp responsiveness with the Verify Now System (Accumetrics Inc.) We measured the antiplatelet effect in all ESRD patients at three time points: T1: just before HD; T2: directly after HD; T3: steady state on a HD free day one week after T1. In our study at baseline 10 (32.3%) patients were ASA-low responder (ASA-LR) and 14 (45.2%) patients Clp-low responder (Clp-LR). There was a significant difference in the PRU values before ( T1) and immediately after HD (T2) [PRU T1=234 (169; 274) vs PRUT2= 247 (199; 278); pT1,2=0.036; ]. Results were shown as median ARU T1 (25th, 75th percentile) or median PRU T1 (25th, 75th percentile). Hence HD seems to impair responsiveness to Clp, resulting in an increase of 6.5 % Clp-LR. No significant differences in the ARU values at the different time-points were found.