Thromb Haemost 2015; 113(05): 958-967
DOI: 10.1160/TH14-07-0621
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Type and intensity of FVIII exposure on inhibitor development in PUPs with haemophilia A

A patient-level meta-analysis

Authors

  • Maura Marcucci

    1   Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    2   Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan & Geriatrics, Fondazione-IRCCS Cá Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
  • Maria Elisa Mancuso

    3   Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
  • Elena Santagostino

    3   Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
  • Gili Kenet

    4   The Israel National Haemophilia Centre, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel-Hashomer and the Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Israel
  • Mohssen Elalfy

    5   Haemophilia Centre, Ain Shams University, Egypt
  • Susanne Holzhauer

    6   Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Charite, Berlin, Germany
  • Christoph Bidlingmaier

    7   Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Munich, Germany
  • Carmen Escuriola Ettingshausen

    8   HZRM- Haemophilia Centre Rhein Main, Frankfurt-Moerfelden, Germany
  • Alfonso Iorio*

    1   Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    9   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Ulrike Nowak-Göttl*

    10   Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Thrombosis and Haemostasis Treatment Centre, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 21 July 2014

Accepted after major revision: 18 January 2014

Publication Date:
24 November 2017 (online)

Summary

The impact of treatment-related factors on inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with haemophilia A is still debated. We present the results of a collaborative, individual patient data meta-analytic project. Eligible data sources were published cohorts of PUPs for which patient-level data were available. The exposures of interest were factor (F)VIII type (recombinant [rFVIII] vs plasma-derived [pdFVIII]) and treatment intensity (≥ vs < 150 IU/kg/week) at first treatment. Family history of inhibitors, F8 mutations, age, treatment regimen (on-demand vs prophylaxis), secular trend and surgery were analysed as putative confounders using different statistical approaches (multivariable Cox regression, propensity score analyses, CART). Analyses accounted for the multi-centre origin of the data. We included 761 consecutive, unselected PUPs with moderate to severe haemophilia A from 10 centres in Egypt, Germany, Israel and Italy. A total of 27 % of patients developed inhibitors; 40 % and 22 % of patients treated with rFVIII and pdFVIII (unadjusted HR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.6–2.9), respectively; 51 % and 24 % of patients receiving high-and low-intensity treatment (unadjusted HR 2.9, 95 % CI 2.0–4.2), respectively. In adjusted analyses, only treatment intensity remained an independent predictor; the effect of FVIII type was largely due to confounding, but with a significant interaction between FVIII type and treatment intensity. This patient-level meta-analysis confirms, across different statistical approaches, that high-intensity treatment is a strong risk factor for inhibitor development. The possible role of FVIII type in subgroups is suggested by the test for interactions but could not be proven because of the limited subgroups sample sizes.

* Ulrike Nowak-Göttl and Alfonso Iorio equally share the senior author position, and both act as warrantor for this paper.