A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in a large healthcare system

Summary

Dabigatran is approved for stroke risk reduction in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data from diverse clinical practice settings will help establish whether the risk:benefit ratio seen in clinical trials is comparable with routine clinical care. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in clinical practice. We undertook a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study (N=12,793 per group; mean age 74) comparing treatment with dabigatran or warfarin in the US Department of Defense claims database, October 2009 to July 2013. Treatment-naïve patients with first prescription claim for dabigatran (either FDA-approved dose) or warfarin between October 2010 and July 2012 (index) and a diagnosis of NVAF during the 12 months before index date were included. Primary outcomes were stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, major gastrointestinal (GI), urogenital or other bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Time-to-event was investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Outcomes comparisons were made utilising Cox-proportional hazards models of PSM groups. Dabigatran users experienced fewer strokes (adjusted hazard ratio [95 % confidence intervals] 0.73 [0.55–0.97]), major intracranial (0.49 [0.30–0.79]), urogenital (0.36 [0.18–0.74]) and other (0.38 [0.22–0.66]) bleeding, MI (0.65 [0.45–0.95]) and deaths (0.64 [0.55–0.74]) than the warfarin group. Major bleeding (0.87 [0.74–1.03]) and major GI bleeding (1.13 [0.94–1.37]) was similar between groups and major lower GI bleeding events were more frequent (1.30 [1.04–1.62]) with dabigatran. In conclusion, compared with warfarin, dabigatran treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke and most outcomes measured, but increased incidence of major lower GI bleeding.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation - anticoagulant - stroke - stroke prevention - bleeding

• References

• 1 Kokotailo RA, Hill MD. Coding of stroke and stroke risk factors using international classification of diseases, revisions 9 and 10. Stroke 2005; 36: 1776-1781.
• 2 Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB. et al. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study. Am J Med 1995; 98: 476-484.
• 3 Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W. et al. Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U. S. adult population. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 1142-1147.
• 4 Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 857-867.
• 5 Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J. et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1633-1652.
• 6 January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS. et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: e1-76.
• 7 Aguilar MI, Kuo RS, Freeman WD. New anticoagulants (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Neurol Clin 2013; 31: 659-675.
• 8 Stassen J RK, Zimmerman R. et al. Pharmacodynamics of the synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor BIBR 954 ZW in healthy subjects. XVIII Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Paris, France. July 6–12, 2001. Thromb Haemost. 2001 Abstract OC2347.
• 9 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151.
• 10 Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 2011; 10: 150-161.
• 11 Zalesak M, Siu K, Francis K. et al. Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 06: 567-574.
• 12 Go AS, Hylek EM, Chang Y. et al. Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well do randomized trials translate into clinical practice?. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 290: 2685-2692.
• 13 Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M. et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015; 131: 157-164.
• 14 Bergman E, Smith JG, Wieloch M. et al. Dabigatran in clinical practice--one-year experience at Skane University Hospital. Thromb Res 2013; 132: 316-317.
• 15 Larsen TB, Rasmussen LH, Skjoth F. et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real-world“ patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 2264-2273.
• 16 Michel J, Mundell D, Boga T. et al. Dabigatran for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation – early clinical experience in a hospital population and comparison to trial data. Heart Lung Circ 2013; 22: 50-55.
• 17 Schoof N, Schnee J, Schneider G. et al. Characteristics of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation using dabigatran or warfarin in the US. Curr Med Res Opin 2014; 30: 795-804.
• 18 Schulman S, Shortt B, Robinson M. et al. Adherence to anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran in a real-world setting. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1295-1299.
• 19 Shore S, Carey EP, Turakhia MP. et al. Adherence to dabigatran therapy and longitudinal patient outcomes: insights from the veterans health administration. Am Heart J 2014; 167: 810-817.
• 20 Southworth MR, Reichman ME, Unger EF. Dabigatran and postmarketing reports of bleeding. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1272-1274.
• 21 Steinberg BA, Holmes DN, Piccini JP. et al. Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 02: e000535.
• 22 Larsen TB, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Rasmussen LH. et al. Bleeding events among new starters and switchers to dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 2014; 127: 650-656e5.
• 23 Sorensen R, Gislason G, Torp-Pedersen C. et al. Dabigatran use in Danish atrial fibrillation patients in 2011: a nationwide study. Br Med J Open. 2013 03. pii: e002758.
• 24 Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ. et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation 2011; 123: 2363-2372.
• 25 Sharma M, Cornelius VR, Patel JP. et al. Efficacy and harms of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2015; 132: 194-204.
• 26 Douxfils J, Buckinx F, Mullier F. et al. Dabigatran etexilate and risk of myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 03: e000515.
• 27 Artang R, Rome E, Nielsen JD. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on risk of myocardial infarction from the use of oral direct thrombin inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 1973-1979.