Thromb Haemost 2018; 118(04): 621-629
DOI: 10.1160/TH17-06-0390
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
Schattauer Stuttgart

Pharmacokinetic Modelling to Predict FVIII:C Response to Desmopressin and Its Reproducibility in Nonsevere Haemophilia A Patients

Lisette M. Schütte
1   Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Reinier M. van Hest
2   Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Sara C. M. Stoof
1   Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Frank W. G. Leebeek
1   Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Marjon H. Cnossen
3   Department of Paediatric Haematology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Marieke J. H. A. Kruip
1   Department of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Ron A. A. Mathôt
2   Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 June 2017

01 December 2017

Publication Date:
19 February 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background Nonsevere haemophilia A (HA) patients can be treated with desmopressin. Response of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) differs between patients and is difficult to predict.

Objectives Our aims were to describe FVIII:C response after desmopressin and its reproducibility by population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling.

Patients and Methods Retrospective data of 128 nonsevere HA patients (age 7–75 years) receiving an intravenous or intranasal dose of desmopressin were used. PK modelling of FVIII:C was performed by nonlinear mixed effect modelling. Reproducibility of FVIII:C response was defined as less than 25% difference in peak FVIII:C between administrations.

Results A total of 623 FVIII:C measurements from 142 desmopressin administrations were available; 14 patients had received two administrations at different occasions. The FVIII:C time profile was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Interindividual variability of the estimated baseline FVIII:C, central volume of distribution and clearance were 37, 43 and 50%, respectively. The most recently measured FVIII:C (FVIII-recent) was significantly associated with FVIII:C response to desmopressin (p < 0.001). Desmopressin administration resulted in an absolute FVIII:C increase of 0.47 IU/mL (median, interquartile range: 0.32–0.65 IU/mL, n = 142). FVIII:C response was reproducible in 6 out of 14 patients receiving two desmopressin administrations.

Conclusion FVIII:C response to desmopressin in nonsevere HA patients was adequately described by a population PK model. Large variability in FVIII:C response was observed, which could only partially be explained by FVIII-recent. FVIII:C response was not reproducible in a small subset of patients. Therefore, monitoring FVIII:C around surgeries or bleeding might be considered. Research is needed to study this further.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Kaufmann JE, Vischer UM. Cellular mechanisms of the hemostatic effects of desmopressin (DDAVP). J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1 (04) 682-689
  • 2 Turner NA, Moake JL. Factor VIII is synthesized in human endothelial cells, packaged in Weibel-Palade bodies and secreted bound to ULVWF strings. PLoS One 2015; 10 (10) e0140740
  • 3 Stoof SC, Cnossen MH, de Maat MP, Leebeek FW, Kruip MJ. Side effects of desmopressin in patients with bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2016; 22 (01) 39-45
  • 4 Di Perna C, Riccardi F, Franchini M, Rivolta GF, Pattacini C, Tagliaferri A. Clinical efficacy and determinants of response to treatment with desmopressin in mild hemophilia a. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (07) 732-739
  • 5 Castaman G, Mancuso ME, Giacomelli SH. , et al. Molecular and phenotypic determinants of the response to desmopressin in adult patients with mild hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (11) 1824-1831
  • 6 Lethagen S. Desmopressin in mild hemophilia A: indications, limitations, efficacy, and safety. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003; 29 (01) 101-106
  • 7 Stoof SC, Sanders YV, Petrij F. , et al. Response to desmopressin is strongly dependent on F8 gene mutation type in mild and moderate haemophilia A. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109 (03) 440-449
  • 8 Nance D, Fletcher SN, Bolgiano DC, Thompson AR, Josephson NC, Konkle BA. Factor VIII mutation and desmopressin-responsiveness in 62 patients with mild haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2013; 19 (05) 720-726
  • 9 Rodeghiero F, Castaman G, Di Bona E, Ruggeri M. Consistency of responses to repeated DDAVP infusions in patients with von Willebrand's disease and hemophilia A. Blood 1989; 74 (06) 1997-2000
  • 10 Björkman S. Limited blood sampling for pharmacokinetic dose tailoring of FVIII in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2010; 16 (04) 597-605
  • 11 Carlsson M, Berntorp E, Björkman S, Lindvall K. Pharmacokinetic dosing in prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A. Eur J Haematol 1993; 51 (04) 247-252
  • 12 Hazendonk H, Fijnvandraat K, Lock J. , et al; “OPTI-CLOT” study group. A population pharmacokinetic model for perioperative dosing of factor VIII in hemophilia A patients. Haematologica 2016; 101 (10) 1159-1169
  • 13 Ette EI, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetic modeling: the importance of informative graphics. Pharm Res 1995; 12 (12) 1845-1855
  • 14 Keizer RJ, Karlsson MO, Hooker A. Modeling and simulation workbench for NONMEM: Tutorial on Pirana, PsN, and Xpose. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2013; 2: e50
  • 15 Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Xpose–an S-PLUS based population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model building aid for NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1999; 58 (01) 51-64
  • 16 Lindbom L, Pihlgren P, Jonsson ENiclas. PsN-Toolkit–a collection of computer intensive statistical methods for non-linear mixed effect modeling using NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2005; 80 (03) 277
  • 17 World Federation of Hemophilia. Plasma factor level and duration of administration. Available at: http://www1.wfh.org/publications/files/pdf-1500.pdf . Accessed October 9, 2015
  • 18 Morais JA, Lobato MdoR. The new European Medicines Agency guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010; 106 (03) 221-225
  • 19 Leissinger C, Carcao M, Gill JC, Journeycake J, Singleton T, Valentino L. Desmopressin (DDAVP) in the management of patients with congenital bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2014; 20 (02) 158-167
  • 20 Loomans JI, van Velzen AS, Eckhardt CL. , et al. Variation in baseline factor VIII concentration in a retrospective cohort of mild/moderate hemophilia A patients carrying identical F8 mutations. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (02) 246-254
  • 21 Hsu TC, Pratt KP, Thompson AR. The factor VIII C1 domain contributes to platelet binding. Blood 2008; 111 (01) 200-208
  • 22 Lü J, Pipe SW, Miao H, Jacquemin M, Gilbert GE. A membrane-interactive surface on the factor VIII C1 domain cooperates with the C2 domain for cofactor function. Blood 2011; 117 (11) 3181-3189
  • 23 Chiu PL, Bou-Assaf GM, Chhabra ES. , et al. Mapping the interaction between factor VIII and von Willebrand factor by electron microscopy and mass spectrometry. Blood 2015; 126 (08) 935-938
  • 24 Ebberink EH, Bouwens EA, Bloem E. , et al. Factor VIII/V C-domain swaps reveal discrete C-domain roles in factor VIII function and intracellular trafficking. Haematologica 2017; 102 (04) 686-694
  • 25 Lenting PJ, VAN Schooten CJ, Denis CV. Clearance mechanisms of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5 (07) 1353-1360
  • 26 Lenting PJ, van Mourik JA, Mertens K. The life cycle of coagulation factor VIII in view of its structure and function. Blood 1998; 92 (11) 3983-3996
  • 27 Seary ME, Feldman D, Carcao MD. DDAVP responsiveness in children with mild or moderate haemophilia A correlates with age, endogenous FVIII:C level and with haemophilic genotype. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (01) 50-55
  • 28 Lethagen S, Harris AS, Sjörin E, Nilsson IM. Intranasal and intravenous administration of desmopressin: effect on F VIII/vWF, pharmacokinetics and reproducibility. Thromb Haemost 1987; 58 (04) 1033-1036
  • 29 Mannucci PM, Vicente V, Alberca I. , et al. Intravenous and subcutaneous administration of desmopressin (DDAVP) to hemophiliacs: pharmacokinetics and factor VIII responses. Thromb Haemost 1987; 58 (04) 1037-1039
  • 30 Nolan B, White B, Smith J, O'Reily C, Fitzpatrick B, Smith OP. Desmopressin: therapeutic limitations in children and adults with inherited coagulation disorders. Br J Haematol 2000; 109 (04) 865-869
  • 31 Ludlam CA, Peake IR, Allen N, Davies BL, Furlong RA, Bloom AL. Factor VII and fibrinolytic response to deamino-8-D-argenine vasopressin in normal subjects and dissociate response in some patients with haemophilia and von Willebrand's disease. Br J Haematol 1980; 45 (03) 499-511
  • 32 Mannucci PM, Canciani MT, Rota L, Donovan BS. Response of factor VIII/von Willebrand factor to DDAVP in healthy subjects and patients with haemophilia A and von Willebrand's disease. Br J Haematol 1981; 47 (02) 283-293