RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00039245.xml

CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2014; 02(01): 1-9
DOI: 10.12945/j.aorta.2014.14-005
DOI: 10.12945/j.aorta.2014.14-005
PRO-CON Debate
Can the Results of Aortic Valve Repair Equal the Results of a Biologic Aortic Valve Replacement?
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
01. Februar 2014
01. Februar 2014
Publikationsdatum:
24. September 2018 (online)

Abstract
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been the default procedure for the surgical management of aortic valve disease, with repair techniques heterogeneously and infrequently used. However, surgical aortic valve repair has evolved with improved techniques. Yet many questions remain regarding the ideal techniques and real-world applicability and effectiveness of valve repair. The AORTA Great Debate highlighted and discussed the controversies regarding the surgical management of aortic valve disease.
-
References
- 1 Forcillo J, Pellerin M, Perrault LP. et al. Carpenter-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position: 25-years experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96: 486-93
- 2 Sharma V, Suri RM, Dearani JA. et al. Expanding relevance of aortic valve repair-is earlier operation indicated?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; Jan; 147 (01) 100-7 . 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.015