Download PDF
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2016; 44(05): 279-285
DOI: 10.15653/TPG-150800
Originalartikel
Schattauer GmbH

Abomasal ulcers in slaughtered cattle in Austria

Article in several languages: deutsch | English
Alexandra Hund
1   Department für Nutztiere und öffentliches Gesundheitswesen in der Veterinärmedizin, Universitätsklinik für Wiederkäuer, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien
,
Theresa Beer
2   Pöllauberg, Österreich
,
Thomas Wittek
1   Department für Nutztiere und öffentliches Gesundheitswesen in der Veterinärmedizin, Universitätsklinik für Wiederkäuer, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 02 October 2015

Akzeptiert nach Revision: 18 March 2016

Publication Date:
23 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: In this preliminary study, the prevalence of abomasal ulcers in cattle in Austria was evaluated for the first time. Furthermore, possible management factors contributing to the formation of abomasal ulcers and the diagnostic ability of faecal occult blood tests were evaluated. Material and methods: Abomasa of 91 calves, 33 cows and 91 bulls were examined for abomasal ulcers after slaughter. The ulcers were recorded, abomasal content pH was measured and faeces were examined for occult blood. The carcass classification was recorded and the owners were presented with a voluntary questionnaire targeted at health-, management- and feeding-practices that could influence gastric health. Results: The median abomasal pH was 3.0 in calves, 3.6 in bulls and 3.9 in cows. More than 50% of all animals had abomasal ulcers, all of which belonged to the slightest kind of lesion. Faecal occult blood tests proved not to be suitable for detecting these ulcers. From the questionnaire no clear tendencies as far as causative factors for abomasal ulcers could be determined. Conclusion and clinical relevance: It can be assumed that cattle management systems in Austria contribute to the formation of low-grade abomasal ulcers. Due to the lack of a suitable in vivo model to research the formation of abomasal ulcers in cattle all further speculations must remain elusive. Further influencing factors, such as bacterial ulcer colonization, and the true economic and animal welfare impact of these findings need further investigation. The results of this study should be corroborated in a larger, prospective trial.

Keywords

Faecal occult blood - pH value - management factors - animal welfare
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ahmed AF, Constable PD, Misk NA. Effect of orally administered cimetidine and ranitidine on abomasal luminal pH in clinically normal milk-fed calves. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1531-1538.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ahmed AF, Constable PD, Misk NA. Effect of feeding frequency and route of administration on abomasal luminal pH in dairy calves fed milk Replacer. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 1502-1508.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aukema JJ, Breukink HJ. Abomasal ulcer in adult cattle with fatal haemorrhage. Cornell Vet 1974; 64: 303-317.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bähler C, Regula G, Stoffel MH, Steiner A, vonRotz A. Effects of the two production programs 'Naturafarm’ and 'conventional’ on the prevalence of non-perforating abomasal lesions in Swiss veal calves at slaughter. Res Vet Sci 2010; 88: 352-360.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Braun U, Bretscher R, Gerber D. Bleeding abomasal ulcers in dairy cows. Vet Rec 1991; 129: 279-284.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Braun U, Eicher R, Ehrensperger F. Type 1 abomasal ulcers in dairy cattle. Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin Reihe A. 1991; 38: 357-366.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Braun U. Labmagengeschwür. Innere Medizin und Chirurgie des Rindes.. Dirksen G, Gründer H-D, Stöber M. Berlin: Parey; 2002: 500-506.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Dirksen G, Doll K, Seitz A, Rademacher G, Breitner W, Klee W. Labmagengeschwüre beim Kalb: klinische Untersuchungen und Erfahrungen. Tierärztl Prax 1997; 25: 318-328.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fox FH. The esophagus, stomach, intestines and peritoneum. Bovine Medicine and Surgery.. Amstutz HE. Santa Barbara, CA: American Veterinary Publications; 1980: 667-668.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 GmbH RD. hemo FEC cobas. REF 10243744 176 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Groth W, Berner H. Studies on abomasal ulcers in calves fed milk substitutes and early weaned. Zentralbl Veterinarmed Reihe A 1971; 18: 481-488.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ide PR, Henry JH. Abomasal abnormalities in dairy cattle: a review of 90 clinical cases. Can VetJ 1964; 5: 46-55.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jelinski MD, Ribble CS, Campbell JR, Janzen ED. Investigating the relationship between abomasal hairballs and perforating abomasal ulcers in unweaned beef calves. Can VetJ 1996; 37: 23-26.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jensen R, Pierson RE, Braddy PM, Saari DA, Benitez A, Lauerman LH, Horton DP, McChesney AE. Fatal abomasal ulcers in yearling feedlot cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 169: 524-526.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jensen R, Spraker TR, Glock RD, Jones RL, Collins JK, Flack DE, Kerschen R, Hoff RL. Abomasal erosions in feedlot cattle. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53: 110-115.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kielland C, Skjerve E, Østerås O, Zanella AJ. Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 2998-3006.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Krauser K. Untersuchungen zur Pathogenese der Pylorusulzera beim Mastkalb. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wschr 1987; 100: 156-161.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mattiello S, Canali E, Ferrante V, Caniatti M, Gottardo F, Cozzi G, Andrighetto I, Verga M. The provision of solid feeds to veal calves: II. Behavior, physiology, and abomasal damage. J Anim Sci 2002; 80: 367-375.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Murray M. Equine model of inducing ulceration in alimentary squamous epithelial mucosa. Digest Dis Sci 1994; 39: 2530-2535.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ostrow J. Tests for Fecal Occult Blood. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations.. Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW. Boston: Butterworths; 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Palmer J, Whitlock R. Perforated abomasal ulcers in adult dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184: 171-174.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pellegrini FL. Results of a large-scale necroscopic study of equine colonic ulcers. J Equine Vet Sci 2005; 25: 113-117.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Smith DF, Munson L, Erb HN. Abomasal ulcer disease in adult dairy cattle. Cornell Vet 1983; 73: 213-224.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Smith DF, Munson L, Erb HN. Predictive values for clinical signs of abomasal ulcer disease in adult dairy cattle. Prevent Vet Med 1986; 3: 573-580.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tulleners EP, Hamilton GF. Surgical resection of perforated abomasal ulcers in calves. Can VetJ 1980; 21: 262-264.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Valgaeren BR, Pardon B, Flahou B, Verherstraeten S, Goossens E, Timbermont L, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F, Deprez PR. Prevalence and bacterial colonisation of fundic ulcerations in veal calves. Vet Rec 2013; 172 (10) 269.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Van Winden SCL, Müller KE, Kuiper R, Noordhuizen JPTM. Studies on the pH value of abomasal contents in dairy cows during the first 3 weeks after calving. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2002; 49: 157-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Welchman DD, Baust GN. A survey of abomasal ulceration in veal calves. Vet Rec 1987; 121: 586-590.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Whitlock RH. Bovine stomach diseases. Veterinary Gastroenterology.. Anderson NV. Philadelphia: Lea and Febinger; 1980: 425-428.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Wiepkema PR, Van Hellemond KK, Roessingh P, Romberg H. Behaviour and abomasal damage in individual veal calves. Applied Anim Behav Sci 1987; 18: 257-268.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar