CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2016; 74(12): 1014-1020
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20160148
CLINICAL SCALES, CRITERIA AND TOOLS

Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Dispositional Resilience Scale among Brazilian adult patients

Estrutura fatorial e propriedades psicométricas da Escala de Resiliência Disposicional para pacientes brasileiros adultos
João Paulo Consentino Solano
1   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Grupo de Controle da Dor, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
,
Eduardo Sawaya Botelho Bracher
2   Axis Clínica de Coluna, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
,
Alexandre Faisal-Cury
3   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
,
Hazem Adel Ashmawi
1   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Grupo de Controle da Dor, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
,
Maria José Carvalho Carmona
1   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Grupo de Controle da Dor, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
,
Francisco Lotufo Neto
4   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Psiquiatria, São Paulo SP, Brasil.
,
Joaquim Edson Vieira
1   Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Anestesiologia, Grupo de Controle da Dor, São Paulo SP, Brasil;
› Author Affiliations
Support: This study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP - Brazil) – grant no. 2011/08406-0.

ABSTRACT

Objective Verifying the psychometrics of a Brazilian version of the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS-15).

Methods Cross-cultural adaptation was done interviewing 65 adult patients. Validation was evaluated by application of the Lipp Brazilian Stress Symptoms Inventory (ISSL), Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ), and other measures to 575 participants from the psychiatric ambulatories (for borderline personality, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorders) and non-psychiatric ambulatories (chronic pain, pre-anesthetic consultation and companions for the latter). Temporal stability was verified with 123 participants.

Results Exploratory factor analysis yielded a three-factor solution. Psychometrics were acceptable (alpha coefficient, 0.71; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.81). Correlations with the ISSL, SRQ and other measures were noted except for factor 3. In the psychiatric sample, hardiness scores of borderline patients were lower than those of patients with anxiety disorders.

Conclusion This version of the DRS-15 exhibited good reliability in a sample of Brazilian patients; validity was confirmed in two of the scale factors.

RESUMO

Objetivo

Verificar as propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da Escala de Resiliência Disposicional (DRS-15).

Métodos A adaptação transcultural foi feita com 65 pacientes. A validação foi estudada pela aplicação do Inventário de Sintomas de Stress para Adultos de Lipp (ISSL), Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ) e outros instrumentos a 575 participantes de ambulatórios psiquiátricos (transtorno borderline de personalidade, ansiedade ou transtorno de estresse pós-traumático) e não-psiquiátricos (dor crçnica, avaliação pré-anestésica ou acompanhantes). A estabilidade foi verificada com 123 participantes.

Resultados A análise exploratória revelou três fatores, com propriedades aceitáveis (alfa de 0,71; coeficiente de correlação intraclasse de 0,81). Notaram-se correlações com o ISSL, SRQ e demais instrumentos, exceto para o fator 3. Na amostra psiquiátrica, a resiliência disposicional dos pacientes borderlines foi menor que a dos pacientes com transtornos de ansiedade.

Conclusão Esta versão da DRS-15 apresentou boa confiabilidade numa amostra de adultos; a validade foi confirmada para dois fatores da escala.

Support:

This study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP - Brazil) – grant no. 2011/08406-0.




Publication History

Received: 08 January 2016

Accepted: 27 July 2016

Article published online:
06 September 2023

© 2023. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Luthar SS, Brown PJ. Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future. Dev Psychopathol. 2007;19(3):931-55. doi:10.1017/S0954579407000454
  • 2 Yunes MAM, Szymanski H. Resiliência: noção, conceitos afins e considerações críticas. In: Tavares J, editor. Resiliência e educação. 2a ed. São Paulo: Cortez; 2001.
  • 3 Southwick S, Charney D. Resilience: the science of mastering life’s greatest challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
  • 4 Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Courington S. Personality and constitution as mediators in the stress-illness relationship. J Health Soc Behav. 1981;22(4):368-78. doi:10.2307/2136678
  • 5 Maddi SR. The history of hardiness: twenty years of theorizing, research, and practice. Consult Psychol J. 2002;54(3):173-85. doi:10.1037/1061-4087.54.3.173
  • 6 Bartone PT. Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale-15, a brief hardiness scale. Psychol Rep. 2007;101(3 Pt 1):943-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.3.943-944
  • 7 Taylor MK, Pietrobon R, Taverniers J, Leon MR, Fern BJ. Relationships of hardiness to physical and mental health status in military men: a test of mediated effects. J Behav Med. 2013;36(1):1-9. doi:10.1007/s10865-011-9387-8
  • 8 Dolbier CL, Smith SE, Steinhardt MA. Relationships of protective factors to stress and symptoms of illness. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(4):423-33. doi:10.5993/AJHB.31.4.9
  • 9 Garmezy N. Resilience and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. Am Behav Sci. 1991;34(4):416-30. doi:10.1177/0002764291034004003
  • 10 Werner EE, Smith RS. Risk, resilience and recovery: perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study. Dev Psychopathol. 1993;5(4):503-15. doi:10.1017/S095457940000612X
  • 11 Bonanno GA. Uses and abuses of the resilience construct: loss, trauma, and health-related adversities. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(5):753-6. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.022
  • 12 Stewart DE, Yuen T. A systematic review of resilience in the physically ill. Psychosomatics. 2011;52(3):199-209. doi:10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.036
  • 13 Brooks MV. Health-related hardiness and chronic illness: a synthesis of current research. Nurs Forum. 2003;38(3):11-20. doi:10.1111/j.0029-6473.2003.00011.x
  • 14 Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Silva GA, Menezes AM, Monteiro CA, Barreto SM et al. Chronic non-communicable diseases in Brazil: burden and current challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9781):1949-61. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60135-9
  • 15 Windle G, Bennett KM, Noyes J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9(1):8. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
  • 16 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  • 17 Lipp M. Manual do inventário de sintomas de stress para adultos de Lipp. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2000.
  • 18 Mari JJ, Williams P. A validity study of a psychiatric screening questionnaire (SRQ-20) in primary care in the city of Sao Paulo. Br J Psychiatry. 1986;148(1):23-6. doi:10.1192/bjp.148.1.23
  • 19 Sheehan TJ. Creating a psychosocial measurement model from stressful life events. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(2):265-71. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00377-0
  • 20 Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;50(2):133-49. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4
  • 21 Bracher ES, Pietrobon R, Eluf-Neto J. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the chronic pain grade. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):847-52. doi 10.1007/s11136-010-9637-1
  • 22 Apolinario D, Mansur LL, Carthery-Goulart MT, Brucki SM, Nitrini R. Cognitive predictors of limited health literacy in adults with heterogeneous socioeconomic backgrounds. J Health Psychol. 2015;20(12):1613-25. doi:10.1177/1359105313520337
  • 23 Araujo DV, Zoboli EL, Massad E. [How to make consent forms easier to read?]. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2010;56(2):151-6. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S0104-42302010000200011
  • 24 Campbell-Sills L, Stein MB. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress. 2007;20(6):1019-28. doi:10.1002/jts.20271
  • 25 Stewart-Knox B, E Duffy M, Bunting B, Parr H, Vas de Almeida MD, Gibney M. Associations between obesity (BMI and waist circumference) and socio-demographic factors, physical activity, dietary habits, life events, resilience, mood, perceived stress and hopelessness in healthy older Europeans. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):424. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-424
  • 26 Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86(2):127-37.
  • 27 Pollack MH, Stein MB, Davidson JR, Ginsberg DL. New challenges for anxiety disorders: where treatment, resilience, and economic priority converge. CNS Spectr. 2004;9(4):1-10. doi:10.1017/S1092852900027097
  • 28 Davydov DM, Stewart R, Ritchie K, Chaudieu I. Resilience and mental health. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(5):479-95. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003
  • 29 Leyro TM, Zvolensky MJ, Bernstein A. Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: a review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(4):576-600. doi:10.1037/a0019712
  • 30 Meares R, Gerull F, Stevenson J, Korner A. Is self disturbance the core of borderline personality disorder? An outcome study of borderline personality factors. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(3):214-22. doi:10.3109/00048674.2010.551280