Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25(06): 498-505
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-10-0138
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Computed tomography of ununited anconeal process in the dog

E. G. Gasch
1   Clinique Vétérinaire du Dr. Bardet, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
,
J. J. Labruyère
2   VetCTSpecialists Ltd., St John's Innovation Center, Cambridge, England
,
J. F. Bardet
1   Clinique Vétérinaire du Dr. Bardet, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 04 October 2011

Accepted 13 June 2012

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe computed tomography (CT) features of the ununited anconeal process and relate them with the following elbow dysplasia signs: medial coronoid disease, medial humeral condyle changes, osteoarthritis (OA), and radioulnar incongruence.

Methods: Computed tomographic images of dogs older than six months with an ununited anconeal process were evaluated (n = 13). Ununited anconeal process features were described as being complete or incomplete, and the degree of displacement, volume, and presence of cysts and sclerosis were also evaluated. Medial coronoid disease was defined as an irregular medial coronoid process shape, presence of sclerosis and fragmentation. Medial humeral condyle changes were defined as subchondral bone flattening, lucencies, and sclerosis. Osteoarthritis was graded depending on the osteophytes size. Radioulnar incongruence was measured on a sagittal view at the base of the medial coronoid process.

Results: Eleven elbows had a complete and two had an incomplete ununited anconeal process. All ununited anconeal processes had cystic and sclerotic lesions. Seven ununited anconeal processes were displaced and six were non-displaced. Mean ununited anconeal process volume was 1.35 cm3 (0.61 cm3 – 2.08 cm3). Twelve elbows had signs of medial coronoid disease (4 of them with a fragmented medial coronoid process), and one elbow did not show any evidence of medial coronoid disease. Ten elbows had medial humeral condyle changes. One elbow had grade 1 OA, seven elbows had grade 2, and five elbows grade 3. All elbows had radioulnar incongruence: three elbows had a negative and 10 elbows had a positive radioulnar incongruence. Mean radioulnar incongruence was 1.49 mm (0.63 mm – 2.61 mm). Computed tomographic findings were similar in the majority of the elbows studied: complete ununited anconeal processes with signs of medial coronoid disease, positive radioulnar incongruence, high grade of OA, sclerotic medial humeral condyle changes, and large ununited anconeal process volumes.

Clinical significance: Incomplete small ununited anconeal process volumes could be associated with a lower incidence of medial coronoid disease or medial humeral condyle changes. We recommend performing preoperative CT of elbows with an ununited anconeal process to evaluate concurrent lesions.

Keywords

Computed tomography - ununited anconeal process - canine - elbow dysplasia
 

  • References

  • 1 Fox SM, Bloomberg MS, Bright RM. Developmental anomalies of the canine elbow. J Am Animal Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 605-615.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fossum TW. Small Animal Surgery Textbook. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. pg. 1209-1213.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Brinker Flo GL, Piermattei DL. The elbow joint. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. pg. 339-344.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Cawley AJ, Archibald J. Ununited anconeal process in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1959; 134: 454-458.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Moores AP, Benigni L, Lamb RC. Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 390-398.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wagner K, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Radiographic, computed tomographic and arthroscopic evaluation of experimental radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 691-698.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mason DR, Schulz KS, Samii VF. et al. Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 125-132.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 House MR, Marino DJ, Lesser LM. Effect of limb position on elbow congruity with CT evaluation. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 154-160.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gemmill TJ, Mellor DJ, Clements DN. et al. Evaluation of elbow incongruency using CT in dogs suffering fragmented coronoid process. J Small Animal Practice 2005; 46: 327-333.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Samoy Y, Van Ryssen B, Gielen I. et al. Review of the literature: elbow incongruity in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 1-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reichle Jk, Park RD, Bahr AM. Computed tomography findings of dogs with cubital joint lameness. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41: 125-130.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gemmill TJ, Clements DN. Fragmented coronoid process in the dog: is there a role for incongruency?. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48: 361-368.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cook C, Cook J. Diagnostic imaging of canine elbow dysplasia: a review. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 144-153.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Olsson SE. Pathophysiology, morphology and clinical signs of osteochondrosis in the dog. In: Bojrab MJ. editor. Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1993: 777-796.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Roy RG, Wallace LJ, Johnston GR. A retrospective long term evaluation of ununited anconeal process excision on the canine elbow. J Vet Orthop Trauma 1995; 7: 94-97.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Fehr M, Nolte I. Co-existence of ununited anconeal process and fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 61-65.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and development elbow disease in the dog: Part II. J Am Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 725-730.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rovesti Gl, Biasibetti M, Schumacher A. et al. The use of the computed tomography in the diagnostic protocol of the elbow in the dog: 24 joints. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 35-43.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Corley EA, Sutherland TM, Carlson WD. Genetic aspects of canine elbow dysplasia. J Am Vet Med Association 1968; 153: 449-453.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Frazho JK, Graham J, Peck JN. et al. Radiographic evaluation of the anconeal process in skeletally immature dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 829-832.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hayes HM, Selby LA, Wilson GP. et al. Epidemiologic observation of canine elbow disease (emphasis on dysplasia). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1979. 15. 449.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and development elbow disease in the dog: Part I. J Am Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 711-724.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Sjöstrom L, Kasström H, Källberg M. Ununited anconeal process in the dog, Pathogenesis and treatment by osteotomy of the ulna. J Vet Comp Orthop Trauma 1995; 8: 170-176.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wisner ER, Pollard RE. Orthopedic diseases of young and growing dogs and cats. In: Thrall DE. editor. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. St.Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. pg. 268-283.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Schulz KS, Krotscheck U. Canine elbow dysplasia. In: Slatter D. editor. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2002. pg. 1927-1935.
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Carpenter L, Schwarz P. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques of diagnosis FCP of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 78-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Reichle JK, Snaps F. The elbow. Clin Tech Small Animal Practice 1999; 14: 177-186.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Whatmough C, Lamb CR. Computed tomography: principles and applications. The Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian. 2006: 789-798.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, Van Bree H. et al. Computed tomography of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 1400-1407.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kramer A, Holsworth IG, Wisner ER. et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of canine radioulnar incongruence in vivo. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 24-29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tromblee TC, Jones JC, Bahr AM. et al. Effect of computed tomography display window and image plane on diagnostic certainty for characteristics of dysplastic elbow joints in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 858-871.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Preston CA, Schulz KS, Kass PH. In vitro determination of contact areas in the normal elbow joint in dogs. Am Journal Vet Research 2000; 61: 1315-1332.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Eckstein F, Löhe F, Müller-Gerbl M. et al. Stress distribution in the trochlear notch. A model of bicentric load transmission through joints. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 647-653.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Murphy ST, Lewis DD, Shiroma JT. et al. Effect of radiographic positioning on interpretation of cubital joint congruity in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1998; 59: 1351-1357.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gemmill TJ, Hammond G, Mellor D. et al. Use of reconstructed computed tomography for the assessment of Joint spaces in the canine elbow. J Small Anim Prac 2006; 47: 66-74.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Holsworth IG, Wisner ER, Scherrer WE. et al. Accuracy of computerized tomographic evaluation of canine radio-ulnar incongruence in vitro. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 108-113.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bottcher P, Werner H, Ludewig E. et al. Visual estimation of radioulnar incongruence in dogs using three-dimensional image rendering: an in vitro study based on computed tomography imaging. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 161-168.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar