The effect of screw angulation and insertion torque on the push-out strength of polyaxial locking screws and the single cycle to failure in bending of polyaxial locking plates

B. W. Bufkin; M. D. Barnhart; A. J. Kazanovicz; S. J. Naber; S. C. Kennedy

doi:10.3415/VCOT-12-03-0043

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(03): 186-191
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-03-0043

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

The effect of screw angulation and insertion torque on the push-out strength of polyaxial locking screws and the single cycle to failure in bending of polyaxial locking plates

B. W. Bufkin

¹MedVet Medical and Cancer Center for Pets, Worthington, OH, USA

,

M. D. Barnhart

¹MedVet Medical and Cancer Center for Pets, Worthington, OH, USA

,

A. J. Kazanovicz

²Securos, Fiskdale, MA, USA

,

S. J. Naber

³Securos, Fiskdale, MA, USA

,

S. C. Kennedy

¹MedVet Medical and Cancer Center for Pets, Worthington, OH, USA

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To evaluate the mechanical properties of the Polyaxial Advanced Locking System (PAX) in screw push-out and four-point bending.

Materials and methods: Screw push-out: PAX locking screws were applied to first generation PAX plates at three different insertion angles with two different insertion torques. A load was applied parallel to the screw axis, and screw push-out force was measured. Four-point bending: PAX plates were applied to a bone model and a fracture gap was simulated. Bending stiffness, bending strength, and bending structural stiffness were evaluated and compared to published data.

Results: Screw push-out forces were significantly higher at 0 and 5 degree insertion angles when compared with an insertion angle of 10 degrees. An insertion torque of 3.5 Nm also produced significantly higher push-out forces compared to 2.5 Nm. Four-point bending: Qualitative comparison of the data gained in this study with previously published data suggests that the PAX system bending stiffness and bending structural stiffness seems to be higher than that of other veterinary orthopaedic implants, but the bending strength was similar.

Clinical relevance: The PAX locking system offers the benefit of polyaxial screw insertion while maintaining comparable biomechanical properties to other currently available orthopaedic implants.

Keywords

locking screws - locking plates - bone plate - Polyaxial - push-out strength - insertion torque - screw angulation

Full Text

References

References
1 Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E. et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 488-493.
2 Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 Suppl 2 B31-42.
3 Blake CA, Boudrieau RJ, Torrance BS. et al. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 1-9.
4 Baroncelli AB, Reif U, Bignardi C. et al. Effect of screw insertional torque on push-out strength in 5 different angular stable systems. Proceedings of the 3rd World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress. 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: p. 542-543.
5 Suzuki T, Smith WR, Stahel PF. et al. Technical problems and complications in the removal of the less invasive stabilization system. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24: 369-373.
6 Kyon Advanced locking plate system [document on internet]. Kyon Veterinary Surgical Products. 2010 [Cited 2012 February 27]. Available from: http://www.kyon.ch/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Kyon_Alps_8s.pdf
7 Securos PAX Advanced Locking System. Veterinary Osteosynthesis Set [document on internet]. Securos USA 2010 [Cited 2012 February 27]. Available from: http://www.securos.com/Portals/7/prod_instr/templates/PAX-USA-manual.pdf
8 DeTora MD, Kraus KH. Mechanical testing of locking and non-locking 3.5mm bone plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 318-322.
9 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Bone Plates, ASTM F382-99 (reapproved 2003). In: 2003 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshoohocken, PA: ASTM; 2003
10 Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM. et al. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 1996; 118: 391-398.
11 Ramaswamy R, Evans S, Kosashvili Y. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?. Injury 2010; 41: 179-183.
12 Kääb MJ, Schmeling AF, Schaser K. et al. Locked internal fixator: sensitivity of screw/plate stability to the correct insertion angle of the screw. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 483-487.
13 Demko JL, Soniat ME, Elder S. et al. Axial pull-out strength of 3.5 cortical and 4.0 cancellous bone screws placed in canine proximal tibias using manual and power tapping. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 323-328.
14 Murphy TP, Hill CM, Kapatkin AS. et al. Pullout properties of 3.5-mm AO/ASIF seft-tapping and cortex screws in a uniform synthetic material and in canine bone. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 253-260.
15 Kong YK, Lowe BD, Lee SJ. et al. Evaluation of handle design characteristics in a maximum screwdriving torque task. Ergonomics 2007; 50: 1404-1418.
16 Törnkvist H, Hearn TC, Schatzker J. The strength of plate fixation in relation to the number and spacing of screws. J Orthop Trauma 1996; 10: 204-208.