The effect of limb amputation on standing weight distribution in the remaining three limbs in dogs

Summary

Despite the fact that limb amputation is a commonly performed procedure in veterinary medicine, quantitative data regarding outcomes are lacking. The intention of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb amputation on weight distribution to the remaining three limbs at a stance in dogs. Ten dogs with a prior forelimb amputation and ten dogs with a prior hindlimb amputation; all of which had no history of orthopaedic or neural disease in the remaining three limbs were included in the study. Standing weight bearing was evaluated with a commercial stance analyzer in all dogs. Five valid trials were obtained and a mean percentage of weight bearing was calculated for each remaining limb. The dogs with a previous forelimb amputation, and also those with a previous hindlimb amputation, had the largest mean increase in weight bearing in the contra -lateral forelimb. In conclusion, proactive monitoring of orthopaedic disease in the contralateral forelimb may be advisable in dogs with a previous limb amputation. In addition, when determining candidacy for a limb amputation, disease of the contralateral forelimb should be thoroughly evaluated.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-05-0075

Keywords

Gait analysis - amputation - musculoskeletal diseases - dog

• References

• 1 Kirpensteijn J., van den Bos R., Endenburg N.. Adaptation of dogs to the amputation of a limb and their owners’ satisfaction with the procedure. Vet Rec 1999; 144: 115-118.
• 2 Dickerson VM., Coleman KD., Ogawa M.. et al. Outcomes of dogs undergoing limb amputation, owner satisfaction with limb amputation procedures, and owner perceptions regarding post surgical adaptation: 64 cases (2005-2012). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015; 247: 786-792.
• 3 Jarvis SL., Worley DR., Hogy SM.. et al. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of dogs during trotting after amputation of a thoracic limb. Am J Vet Res 2013; 74: 1155-1163.
• 4 Hogy SM., Worley DR., Jarvis SL.. et al. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of dogs during trotting after amputation of a pelvic limb. Am J Vet Res 2013; 74: 1164-1171.
• 5 Fuchs A., Anders A., Nolte I.. et al. Limb and back muscle activity adaptations to tripedal locomotion in dogs. J Exp Zool 2015; 323A: 506-515.
• 6 Galindo-Zamora V., von Babo V., Eberle N.. et al. Kinetic, kinematic, magnetic resonance and owner evaluation of dogs before and after amputation of a hindlimb. BMC Vet Res 2016; 12: 20.
• 7 Weinstein JI., Payne S., Poulson JM.. et al. Use of force plate analysis to evaluate the efficacy of external beam radiation to alleviate osteosarcoma pain. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 673-678.
• 8 Phelps HA., Ramos V., Shires PK.. et al. The effect of measurement method on static weight distribution to all legs in dogs using the quadruped biofeedback system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 108-112.
• 9 Hicks DA., Millis DL., Arnold GA.. et al. Comparison of weight. bearing at a stance vs.. trotting in dogs with rear limb lameness. Abstracts of the 32nd Veterinary Orthopedic Society Conference 2005 March 5-12; Aspen, CO, USA. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: A49
• 10 Millis D., Levine D.. Canine Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2014