Pelvic limb alignment measured by computed tomography in purebred English Bulldogs with medial patellar luxation

Summary

Objectives: The aim of the study was to describe the differences in pelvic limb alignment between healthy purebred English Bulldogs and those with medial patellar luxation through the measurement of femoral and tibial angles on computed tomography images in multiplanar reconstruction modality (MPRCT).

Methods: Twenty-one purebred English Bulldogs were included and divided into two groups: one including healthy dogs (15 limbs) and the other including those with medial patellar luxation (24 limbs). Three different observers used MPR-CT to measure the following angles: anatomical lateral proximal femoral angle (aLPFA), anatomical lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), angle of inclination of the femoral neck (AI), angle of anteversion (AA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), mechanical medial distal tibial angle (mMDTA), mechanical caudal distal tibial angle (mCdDTA), mechanical caudal proximal tibial angle (mCdPTA), and the tibial torsion angle (TTA). A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare each variable in both groups.

Results: The values for aLDFA and mLDFA in the medial patellar luxation population were significantly increased compared to healthy subjects (p <0.05). No significant differences were observed for the other variables.

Clinical significance: In our population, an increased distal femoral varus was associated with medial patellar luxation. Our results could be useful to determine whether or not angular deformity of the femur is present and help determine the degree of correction necessary to restore alignment.

ORCID iD:

FMM: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-2540

Keywords

Patellar luxation - English Bulldog - computed tomography - multiplanar reconstruction - limb alignment

• References

• 1 Van Grevenhof EM, Hazewinkel HAW, Heuven HCM. Breeding implication resulting from classification of patellae luxation in dogs. J Anim Breed Genet 2015; 1-7.
• 2 Yasukawa S, Edamura K, Tanegashima K. et al. Evaluation of bone deformities of the femur, tibia, and patella in toy poodles with medial patellar luxation using computed tomography. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29: 29-38.
• 3 Mortari AC, Rahal SC, Vulcano LC. et al. Use of radiographic measurements in the evaluation of dogs with medial patellar luxation. Can Vet J 2009; 50: 1064-1068.
• 4 Harasen G. Patellar luxation. Can Vet J 2006; 47: 817-818.
• 5 Alam MR, Lee JI, Kang HS. et al. Frequency and distribution of patellar luxation in dogs 134 cases (2000 to 2005). Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 59-64.
• 6 Piermattei DL, Flo GL. The stifle joint. In Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Editors Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006: 562-582.
• 7 Apelt D, Kowaleski MP, Dyce J. Comparison of computed tomographic and standard radiographic determination of tibial torsion in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 457-462.
• 8 Tomlinson J, Fox D, Cook JL. et al. Measurements of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 593-598.
• 9 Dudley RM, Kowaleski MP, Drost WT. et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic determination of femoral varus and torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 546-552.
• 10 Bardet JF, Rudy RL, Hohn RB. Measurement of femoral torsion in dogs using a biplanar method. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 1-6.
• 11 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. et al. Radiographic measurement of the proximal and distal mechanical joint angles in the canine tibia. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 699-704.
• 12 Lambert RJ, Wendlburg KL. Determination of the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle using a tangential radiographic technique. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 181-186.
• 13 Barnes DM, Anderson AA, Frost C. et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements of femoral and tibial alignment using computed tomography multiplanar reconstructions. Vet Surg 2015; 44: 85-93.
• 14 Singleton WB. The surgical correction of stifle deformities in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1969; 10: 59-69.
• 15 Paley D. Normal lower limb alignment and join orientation. In: Principles of Deformity Correction. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005: 1-17.
• 16 Nunamaker DM, Beiry DN, Newton CD. Femoral neck anteversion in the dog: its radiographic measurement. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1973; 14: 45-48.
• 17 Towle HA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Pre- and postoperative radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of dogs with medial patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 265-272.
• 18 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Radiographic evaluation of femoral torsion and correlation with computed tomographic techniques in Labrador retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 534-541.
• 19 Rumph PF, Hathcock JT. A Symmetric axis-based method for measuring the projected femoral angle of inclination in dog. Vet Surg 1990; 19: 328-333.
• 20 Petazzoni M. Radiographic measurements of the tibia. In Petazzoni M, Jaeger GH. Atlas of clinical goniometry and radiographic measurements of the canine pelvic limb. 2nd ed. Milano: Merial; 2008: 60-69.
• 21 Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. et al. Radiographic measurement of canine tibial angles in the sagittal plane. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 300-305.
• 22 Aper R, Kowaleski MP, Apelt D. et al. Computed tomographic determination of tibial torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46: 187-191.
• 23 Fitzpatrick C, Krotscheck U, Thompson MS. et al. Evaluation of tibial torsion in Yorkshire terriers with and without medial patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 966-972.
• 24 Bound N, Zakai D, Butterworth S. et al. The prevalence of canine patellar luxation in three centres. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 32-37.
• 25 Schulz K. Diseases of the Joints. In Fossum TW. Editor Small Animal Surgery. 3rd ed. Mosby Elsevier: St Louis; 2002: 1143-1315.
• 26 Hulse DA. Pathophysiology and management of medial patellar luxation in the dog. Vet Med Small Anim Clin 1981; 76: 43-51.
• 27 Swiderski JK, Palmer RH. Long-term outcome of distal femoral osteotomy for treatment of combined distal femoral varus and medial patellar luxation: 12 cases (1999-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1070-1075.
• 28 Aiken M, Barnes D. Are the fabellae bisected by the femoral cortices in a true craniocaudal pelvic limb radiograph?. J Small Anim Pract 2014; 55: 465-470.
• 29 Roush JK. Canine patellar luxation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 855-868.
• 30 Campbell JR, Pond MJ. The canine stifle joint II. Medial luxation of the patella. An assessment of lateral capsular overlap and more radical surgery. J Small Anim Pract 1972; 13: 11-18.
• 31 Soparat C, Wangdee C, Chuthatep S. et al. Radiographic measurement for femoral varus in Pomeranian dogs with and without medial patellar luxation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 197-201.
• 32 Kaiser S, Cornely D, Golder W. et al. The correlation of canine patellar luxation and the anteversion angle as measured using magnetic resonance images. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001; 42: 113-118.
• 33 Hulse DA. The stifle joint. In Olmstead ML. Editor Small Animal Orthopedics. Mosby: St.Louis; 1995: 395-404.
• 34 Schawalder P, Sterchi HP. Der Centrum-Collum-Diaphysenwinkel (CCD) und der Antetorsionswinkel (AT) beim Hund [The centrum-collum-diaphysis angle (CCD) and the anteversion angle (AT) in the dog]. Kleintierpraxis 1981; 26: 151-162.
• 35 Montavon PM, Hohn RB, Olmstead ML. et al. Inclination and anteversion angles of the femoral head and neck in the dog. Vet Surg 1985; 14: 277-282.
• 36 Hauptmann J, Cardinet GH, Morgan JP. et al. Angles of inclination and anteversion in hip dysplasia in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 2033-2036.
• 37 Olimpo M, Piras LA, Peirone B. Pelvic limb alignment in small breed dogs: a comparison between affected and free subjects from medial patellar luxation. Vet Ital 2015: 1-7.
• 38 Petazzoni M. Patellar luxation: when tibia is guilty. Proceedings of the 16th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress Bologna (Italy): 2012. September 12-15 Pg 302-306.
• 39 Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1679-1691.