Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2012; 45(02): 244-254
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.101287
Review Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Pressure ulcers: Back to the basics

Karoon Agrawal
Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, VM Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Neha Chauhan
Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, VM Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 November 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Pressure ulcer in an otherwise sick patient is a matter of concern for the care givers as well as the medical personnel. A lot has been done to understand the disease process. So much so that USA and European countries have established advisory panels in their respective continents. Since the establishment of these organizations, the understanding of the pressure ulcer has improved significantly. The authors feel that the well documented and well publicized definition of pressure ulcer is somewhat lacking in the correct description of the disease process. Hence, a modified definition has been presented. This disease is here to stay. In the process of managing these ulcers the basic pathology needs to be understood well. Pressure ischemia is the main reason behind the occurrence of ulceration. Different extrinsic and intrinsic factors have been described in detail with review of literature. There are a large number of risk factors causing ulceration. The risk assessment scales have eluded the surgical literature and mostly remained in nursing books and websites. These scales have been reproduced for completion of the basics on decubitus ulcer. The classification of the pressure sores has been given in a comparative form to elucidate that most of the classifications are the same except for minor variations. The management of these ulcers is ever evolving but the age old saying of "prevention is better than cure" suits this condition the most.

KEY WORDS

Bed sore - decubitus ulcer - pressure ulcer - prevention - risk factors - ulcer
 
  • 1 Eltorai IM. History of spinal cord medicine.In: Lin VW, Cardenas DD, Cutter NC, Frost FS, Hammond MC, Lindblom LB, et al., editors. Spinal cord medicine: Principles and Practice. New York: Demos Medical Publishing;2003.
  • 2 Adams F. The genuine works of Hippocrates [translated from the Greek]. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1939. p. 231-42.
  • 3 Levine JM. Historical notes on pressure ulcers: The cure of Ambrose Paré. Decubitus 1992;5:23-4.
  • 4 Levine JM. Historical perspective on pressure ulcer: The decubitus ominosus of Jean-Martin Charcot. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:1248-51.
  • 5 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcers: Incidence, economics, risk assessment. Cosensus development conference statement. West Dundee, III: S N publications; 1989. Available from: http://www.npuap.org/pr2/htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 30].
  • 6 Burdette-Taylor SR, Kass J. Heel ulcers in critical care unit: A major pressure problem. Crit Care Nurs 2002;25:41-53.
  • 7 Ozaka K, Watanabe Y. Epidemiology of vascular dementia. Nihon Rinsho 2004;62S:13-7.
  • 8 Cuddigan J, Ayello EA, Sussman C, Baranoski S. Pressure ulcers in America: Prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. An executive summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.2001,153.
  • 9 Meehan M. Multi-site pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Decubitus 1990;3:14-7.
  • 10 Shahin ES, Dassen T, Halfens RJ. Incidence, prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers in intensive care patients: A longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:413-21.
  • 11 Leblebici B, Turhan N, Adam M, Akman MN. Clinical and epidemiologic evaluation of pressure ulcers in patients at a university hospital in Turkey. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:407-11.
  • 12 Chauhan VS, Goel S, Kumar P, Srivastava S, Shukla VK. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients in a university hospital in India. J Wound Care 2005;14:36-7.
  • 13 Bliss MR. Acute pressure area care: Sir James Paget′s legacy. Lancet 1992;339:221-3.
  • 14 Curry K, Casady L. The relationship between extended periods of immobility and decubitus ulcer formation in acutely spinal-cord injured individuals. J Neurosci Nurs 1992;24:185-9.
  • 15 Linares HA, Mawson AR, Saurez E, Biundo JJ. Association between pressure sores and immobilization in the immediate post-injury period. Orthopedics 1987;10:571-3.
  • 16 Mawsun AR, Biundo JJ Jr, Neville P, Linares HA, Winchester Y, Lopez A. Risk factors for early occurring pressure ulcers following spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988;67:123-7.
  • 17 Colen SR. Pressure sores. In: McCarthy JG, May JW, Littler JW,editors. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990.p. 3797-898.
  • 18 Leigh IH, Bennet G. Pressure ulcers: Prevalence, etiology and treatment modalities. A review. Am J Surg 1994;167:25S-30.
  • 19 Ueda K, Tajima S, Sano S,et al. Mortality and recurrence rate after pressure ulcer operation for elderly long-term bedridden patients. J Osaka Med Coll 1990;49:58-63.
  • 20 Kuwahara M, Tada H, Mashiba K, Yurugi S, Iioka H, Niitsuma K, et al. Mortality and recurrence rate after pressure ulcer operation for elderly long-term bedridden patients. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:629-32.
  • 21 Husain T. An experimental study of some pressure effects on tissues, with reference to the bedsore problem. J Pathol Bacteriol 1953;66:347-58.
  • 22 Daniel RK, Priest DL, Wheatley DC. Etiologic factors in pressure sores: An experimental model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;62:492-8.
  • 23 Nola GT, Vistnes LM. Differential response of skin and muscle in the experimental production of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:728-33.
  • 24 Kosaik M. Etiology and pathology of decubitus ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1959;40:62-8.
  • 25 Romaneki M.Science and practice of pressure ulcer management. London. Springer-Verlay London Ltd; 2006.
  • 26 Sangeorzan BJ, Harrington RM, Wyss CR, Czerniecki JM, Matsen FA 3 rd . Circulatory response of skin to loading. J Orthop Res 1989;7:425-31.
  • 27 Collier M. Blanching and non-blanching hyperaemia. J Wound Care 1999;8:63-4.
  • 28 Deeks J,Higgins J, Riis J, Silagy C. Module 11: Summary statistics for dichotomous outcomes data. In: Alderson P, Green S,editors. Cochrane collaboration open learning material for reviewers. Version 1.1. Chichester: John Wiley; 2002. p. 87-102.
  • 29 Gosnell DJ. An assessment tool to identify pressure sores. Nurs Res 1973;22:55-9.
  • 30 Lowthian P. Pressure sore prevalence: A survey of sores in orthopedic patients. Nurs Times 1979;75:358-60.
  • 31 Waterlow J. Pressure sores: A risk assessment card. Nurs Times 1985;81:49-55.
  • 32 Braden B, Bergstrom N. A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehabil Nurs 1987;12:8-12.
  • 33 Gosnell DJ. Pressure sore risk assessment. Part II. Analysis of risk factors. Decubitus 1989;2:40-3.
  • 34 Defloor T. The risk of pressure sore: A conceptual scheme. J Clin Nurs 1999;8:206-16.
  • 35 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Pressure ulcer prevention: Clinical guideline No. 7. London: NICE; 2003.
  • 36 Salcido R, Fisher SB, Donofrio JC, Bieschke M, Knapp C, Liang R, et al . An animal model and computer-controlled surface pressure delivery system for the production of pressure ulcers. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995;32:149-61.
  • 37 Bridel J. The etiology of pressure sores. J Wound Care 1993;2:230-8.
  • 38 Dansereau JG, Conway H. Closure of decubiti in paraplegics. Report of 2000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964;33:474-80.
  • 39 Feldman DL, Sepka RS, Kittzman B. Tissue oxygenation and blood flow on specialized and conventional hospital beds. Ann PlastSurg1993;30:441-4.
  • 40 Walton-Geer PS. Prevention of pressure ulcer in the surgical patient. AORN J 2009;89:538-48.
  • 41 Torra i Bou JE. Valorar el riesgo de presentation presentar úlceras por presión. Escala de Braden. Rev Enferm 1997;224:22-30.
  • 42 Norton D, Exton-Smith AN, McLaren R. An Investigation of Geriatric Nursing Problems in Hospital. London: National Corporation for the Care of Old People; 1962.
  • 43 Berglund B, Nordström G. The use of the modified Norton scale in nursing-home patients. Scand J Caring Sci 1995;9:165-9.
  • 44 Edwards M. The levels of reliability and validity of the Waterlow pressure sore risk calculator. J Wound Care 1995;4:373-8.
  • 45 Weststrate JT, Hop WC, Aalbers AG, Vreeling AW, Bruining HA. The clinical relevance of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:815-20.
  • 46 Bergstrom N, Braden B, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk: Reliability studies. Nurs Res 1987;36:205-10.
  • 47 Bergstrom N, Demuth PJ, Braden BJ. A clinical trial of the Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs Clin North Am 1987;22:417-28.
  • 48 Shea JD. Pressure sores: Classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;112:89-100.