CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2016; 49(01): 42-52
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.182235
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Presurgical nasoalveolar moulding in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Mohammed Zuhaib
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwaan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Krishnamurthy Bonanthaya
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwaan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Renu Parmar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwaan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Pritham N. Shetty
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwaan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Pradeep Sharma
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwaan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 August 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Context: Presurgical nasoalveolar moulding (PNAM) is a non-surgical method of reshaping the cleft lip, alveolus, palate and the nose to minimize the severity of the cleft deformity, before primary cheiloplastyand palatoplasty. In this context, PNAM proves to be an invaluable asset in the management of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Aims: The study was conducted to evaluate the effi cacy of PNAM in the management of unilateral cleft lip and palate with the following objectives: (1) To assess and compare the degree of reduction in the size of cleft palate and alveolus (pre-PNAM and post-PNAM). (2) To evaluate and compare the improvement in columellar length and correction of columellar deviation (pre-PNAM and post-PNAM). (3) To assess the changes in the position of the alar base and the alar cartilages. Settings and Design: Prospective study. Subjects and Methods: A prospective study consisting of, which included 20 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate was conducted. The age at the start of PNAM treatment of the infants ranged from 2 to 44 days of age reporting to our institute between December 2011 and August 2013. All the patients underwent PNAM therapy before primary cheiloplasty at 6 months of age; clinical parameters were assessed pre- and post-therapy using photographs and dental study models of the maxilla. Statistical Analysis Used: Student's t-test for paired comparisons. Results: Results of the study showed a promising reduction in the cleft size before the surgery, signifi cant improvement in nasal symmetry, including the columellar length on the cleft side. Conclusions: PNAM is a valuable adjunct to our surgical armamentarium in dealing with the challenges of primary closure of unilateral cleft lip and palate thereby enhancing the overall surgical outcome. The advantages of this method include the simplicity of the procedure and improving the quality of surgical repair, particularly in obtaining tension free muscle closure in unilateral clefts.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Grayson BH, Garfinkle JS. Early cleft management: The case for nasoalveolar molding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145: 134-42
  • 2 Yu Q, Gong X, Shen G. CAD presurgical nasoalveolar molding effects on the maxillary morphology in infants with UCLP. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 418-26
  • 3 Maull DJ, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, Brecht LL, Bookstein FL, Khorrambadi D. et al. Long-term effects of nasoalveolar molding on three-dimensional nasal shape in unilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999; 36: 391-7
  • 4 Pfeifer TM, Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty versus alveolar bone graft: An outcome analysis of costs in the treatment of unilateral cleft alveolus. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 26-9
  • 5 Ezzat CF, Chavarria C, Teichgraeber JF, Chen JW, Stratmann RG, Gateno J. et al. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate: A preliminary study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007; 44: 8-12
  • 6 Singh GD, Levy-Bercowski D, Yáñez MA, Santiago PE. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007; 10: 161-6
  • 7 Lee CT, Garfinkle JS, Warren SM, Brecht LE, Cutting CB, Grayson BH. Nasoalveolar molding improves appearance of children with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 1131-7
  • 8 Ross RB, MacNamera MC. Effect of presurgical infant orthopedics on facial esthetics in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994; 31: 68-73
  • 9 Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Ross Jr EL. The infl uence of surgery and orthopedic treatment on maxillofacial growth and maxillary arch development in patients treated for orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37: 527-39
  • 10 Berkowitz S. Cleft Lip and Palate. 2nd ed.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006
  • 11 Matsuo K, Hirose T. Preoperative non-surgical over-correction of cleft lip nasal deformity. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 5-11
  • 12 Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999; 36: 486-98
  • 13 Grayson BH, Cutting C, Wood R. Preoperative columella lengthening in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 1422-3
  • 14 Figueroa AA, Polley JW. Orthodontics in cleft lip and palate management. In: Mathes S, Ventz V. editors Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Pediatric Plastic Surgery. Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006: p. 271-310
  • 15 Liou EJ, Subramanian M, Chen PK, Huang CS. The progressive changes of nasal symmetry and growth after nasoalveolar molding: A three-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 858-64
  • 16 McNeil CK. Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate. Dent Rec (London) 1950; 70: 126-32
  • 17 Cho BC. Unilateral complete cleft lip and palate repair using lip adhesion combined with a passive intraoral alveolar molding appliance: Surgical results and the effect on the maxillary alveolar arch. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1510-29
  • 18 Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomono T, Iwasawa M, Katohda S, Takahashi N. et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 38-51 AQ2
  • 19 Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38: 193-8
  • 20 Matsuo K, Hirose T, Otagiri T, Norose N. Repair of cleft lip with nonsurgical correction of nasal deformity in the early neonatal period. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83: 25-31
  • 21 Millard Jr. DR. Embryonic rationale for the primary correction of classical congenital clefts of the lip and palate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76: 150-60
  • 22 Stenstrom SJ, Oberg TR. The nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip. Some notes on its anatomic bases and secondary operative procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1961; 28: 295-305
  • 23 Hogan VM, Converse JM. Secondary deformity of unilateral cleft lip and nose. In: Grabb WC. editor Cleft Lip and Palate – Surgical, Dental and Speech Aspects. Boston: Little, Brown; 1971: p. 245-64
  • 24 Huffman WC, Lierle DM. Studies on the pathologic anatomy of the unilateral harelip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1949; 4: 225-34
  • 25 Millard DR. Cleft Craft: The Evolution of Its Surgery. Bilateral and Rare Deformities. Vol. 2. Boston: Little, Brown; 1977
  • 26 Pai BC, Ko EW, Huang CS, Liou EJ. Symmetry of the nose after presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A preliminary study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42: 658-63
  • 27 Jaeger M, Braga-Silva J, Gehlen D, Sato Y, Zuker R, Fisher D. Correction of the alveolar gap and nostril deformity by presurgical passive orthodontia in the unilateral cleft lip. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 489-94
  • 28 Patel D, Goyal R. Pre-surgical nasoalveolar moulding in patient with unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate: Case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 122-6