Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2012; 45(01): 068-075
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.96590
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Nasomaxillary complex in size, position and orientation in surgically treated and untreated individuals with cleft lip and palate: A cephalometric overview

Authors

  • Rohit Khanna

    Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Babu Banarsi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Tripti Tikku

    Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Babu Banarsi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Jitesh Wadhwa

    Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Babu Banarsi Das College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Background: This cross-sectional retrospective cephalometric study was designed to clarify whether the maxillary deficiency seen in surgically treated individuals with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) is due to inherent growth potential or iatrogenicity. Materials and Methods: 72 adult individuals were randomly selected in the age range of 12-20 years, and were divided into two groups. Group I had 47 untreated individuals. Group II consisted of 25 surgically treated individuals. Lateral and frontal cephalograms of the selected individuals were taken and analysed using Nemoceph software. Results: Group II showed a marked reduction in the cranial base angle, maxillary base length, anterior and posterior maxillary positions, palatal plane angle, maxillary width, maxillary height, occlusal plane height, nasal width and nasal height. Conclusion: Surgical intervention does interfere with growth in the facial region. This could be attributed to the scar tissue in lip and palate region, which has a restraining effect on growth in the facial region. These altered functional matrices play a significant role in determining the growth of facial structures.

 
  • 1 Vanderas AP. Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate and cleft lip and palate: A review. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:216-25.
  • 2 Williams AC, Bearn D, Mildinhall S, Murphy T, Sell D, Shaw WC, et al. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom-the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 2: Dentofacial outcomes and patient satisfaction. Cleft Palate J 2001;38:24-9.
  • 3 Bishara SE. Cephalometric evaluation of facial growth in operated and non-operated individuals with isolated clefts of the palate. Cleft Palate J 1973;10:239-46.
  • 4 Isiekwe MC, Sowemimo GO. Cephalometric findings in normal Nigerian population sample and adult Nigerians with unrepaired clefts. Cleft Palate J 1984;21:323-8.
  • 5 Yoshida H, Nakamura A, Michi K, Wang GM, Liu K, Qiu WL. Cephalometric analysis of maxillofacial morphology in un-operated cleft palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:419-24.
  • 6 Ortiz-Monasterio F, Serrano A, Barrera G, Rodriguez-Hoffman H, Vinageras E. A study of untreated adult cleft patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966;38:36-41.
  • 7 Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Krause JC, Sosa-Martinez R. Cephalometric comparisons of individuals from India and Mexico with un-operated cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:116-25.
  • 8 Mars M, Houston WJ. A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in un-operated males unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:7-10.
  • 9 Capelozza Júnior L, Taniguchi SM, da Silva Júnior OG. Craniofacial morphology of adult un-operated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:376-81.
  • 10 Shetye PR, Evans CA. Midfacial morphology in adult unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Angle Orthod 2006;76:810-6.
  • 11 Millard DR Jr. Cleft Craft. Vol. 1, 1 st ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1976.
  • 12 Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod 1978;48:141-8.
  • 13 Grummons DC, Kappeyne Van de Coppello MA. A frontal asymmetry analysis. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:448-65.
  • 14 Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1972;61:1-28.
  • 15 Kyrkanides S, Bellohusen R, Subtenly J. Skeletal asymmetries of the Naso maxillary complex in non-cleft and post-surgical unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;34:411-6.
  • 16 Mølsted K, Dahl E. Asymmetry of the maxilla in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:184-90.
  • 17 Harris EF. Size and form of the cranial base in isolated cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:170-4.
  • 18 Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: Part 2 repair of lip. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:5-77.
  • 19 Dahl E. Craniofacial morphology in congenital clefts of the lip and palate. An X-ray cephalometric study of young adult males. Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28: Suppl 57:1-61.
  • 20 Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:410-7.
  • 21 Bardach J. The influence of cleft lip repair on facial growth. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:76-8.
  • 22 Bardach J, Roberts DM, Yale R, Rosewall D, Mooney M. The influence of simultaneous cleft lip and palate repair on facial growth in rabbits. Cleft Palate J 1980;17:309-18.
  • 23 Bardach J, Klausner EC, Eisbach KJ. The relationship between lip pressure and facial growth after cleft lip repair: An experimental study. Cleft Palate J 1979;16:137-46.
  • 24 Genaro KF, Trindade Júnior AS, Trindade IE. Electromyographic analysis of lip muscle function in operated cleft subjects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:56-60.
  • 25 Sakuda M, Yoshida K, Wada K, Kuroda Y, Hayashi I. Changes of cheek pressure during swallowing following expansion of the maxillary dental arch in repaired cleft palates. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2:145-56.
  • 26 Smahel Z, Müllerová Z. Facial growth and development in unilateral cleft lip and palate during the period of puberty: Comparison of the development after periosteoplasty and after primary bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:106-15.
  • 27 Hagerty RF, Hill MJ. Facial growth and dentition in un-operated cleft palate. J Dent Res 1963;42:412-21.
  • 28 Bardach J, Eisbach KJ. The influence of primary unilateral cleft lip repair. Cleft Palate J 1977;14:88-97.
  • 29 Bardach J, Mooney MP. The relationship between lip pressure following lip repair and craniofacial growth: An experimental study in beagles. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:544-55.
  • 30 Bardach J, Kelly KM. The influence of lip pressure with and without soft tissue undermining on facial growth in beagles. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:747-5.
  • 31 Smahel Z, Brejcha M. Difference in craniofacial morphology between complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft palate J 1983;20:113-27.
  • 32 Fogh-Andersen P. Inheritance of hare lip and cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:54-65.
  • 33 Bishara SE, de Arrendondo RS, Vales HP, Jakobsen JR. Dento-facial relationship in persons with unoperated clefts: Comparison between three cleft types. Am J Orthod 1985;87:481-507.
  • 34 Sandham A, Cheng L. Cranial base and cleft lip and palate: Angle Orthod 1988;58:163-8.
  • 35 Capelozza Filho L, Normando AD, da Silva Filho OG. Isolated influences of lip and palate surgery on facial growth: Comparison of un-operated and operated male adults with UCLP. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:51-6.
  • 36 Nakasima A, Ichinose M. Characteristics of craniofacial structures of parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate. Am J Orthod 1983;84:140-6.
  • 37 Suzuki A, Takenoshita Y, Honda Y, Matsuura C. Dento craniofacial morphology in parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate: Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:131-8.
  • 38 Raghavan R, Sidhu SS, Kharbanda OP. Craniofacial pattern of children having cleft lip and/or cleft palate anomaly. Angle Orthod 1994;64:137-44.