Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2007; 17(04): 242-246
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.36868
GI Radiology

The role of combining MR cholangiopancreatography and T1W imaging in detecting common bile duct micro-stones

Yin Xindao
Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, P. R., China
,
Wang Liping
Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, P. R., China
,
Lu Lingquan
Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, P. R., China
,
Zhang Taisheng
Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, P. R., China
,
Wu Qianzhi
Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, P. R., China
,
Gu Jianping
Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210006, P. R., China
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective: To assess the role of adding T1W images to MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in detecting common bile duct (CBD) micro-stones. Subjects and Methods: From January 2005 to December 2006, a total of 104 patients with CBD stones were preoperatively studied by routine MRI and MRCP. Micro-stones, measuring less than 5 mm, were proven at surgery or ERCP following the MRI scans, within one to five days in 56/104 patients. Routine MRI scans included RF-FAST axial T1W images (TR/TE 155 ms/3.4 ms) and EXPRESS axial T2W (15000 ms/81 ms) as well as coronal T2W (15000 ms/81 ms) images. Features of CBD micro-calculi on T1W and MRCP images and the sensitivities of T1W images and MRCP for the diagnosis of CBD micro-stones were analyzed. Results: Among these 56 patients, gallbladder stones coexisted with choledocholithiasis in 30 patients and 7 patients had a past history of cholecystectomy for gallstones. The signal intensities of CBD micro-calculi on T1W images were high, relative to the low signal intensity of the bile in 47 patients. Filling defects on MRCP images were shown in 33 patients. Both T1W images alone and a combination of MRCP with T1W images had a higher sensitivity in detecting CBD micro-calculi than MRCP alone. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between the combination of MRCP with T1W images and MRCP alone in the ability to detect micro-stones (Fisher′s exact test, P < 0.01). Conclusion: For MRCP, adding a T1W sequence is helpful in increasing the sensitivity for diagnosing micro-calculi of the common bile ducts.

Keywords

CBD calculi - micro-calculi - MRCP


Publication History

Article published online:
31 July 2021

© 2007. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000;55:25-35.
  • 2 Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, Ernst RD, Black CT, Greger PH, et al . The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480-4.
  • 3 Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW, Lee DW, Chung SS, Sung JJ, et al . Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996;200:85-9.
  • 4 Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, et al . Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2900-4.
  • 5 Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K, Outwater EK. Biliary dilation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes-value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000;214:173-81.
  • 6 Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.). Surg Endosc 1998;12:856-64.
  • 7 Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: Diagnosis, management and prevention. Nat Med J India 2002; 15 :27-31.
  • 8 Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314-20.
  • 9 Laokpessi A, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, Cessot F, Desport JC, Le Sidaner A, et al . Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2354-9.
  • 10 Jendresen MB, Thorboll JE, Adamsen S, Nielsen H, Grψnvall S, Hart-Hansen O. Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective study. Eur J Surg 2002;168:690-4.
  • 11 Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, et al . Detection of common bile duct stones: Comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 2005;54:271-5.
  • 12 Kim YK, Kim CS, Lee JM, Ko SW, Chung GH, Lee SO, et al . Value of adding T1-weighted image to MR cholangiopancreatography for detecting intrahepatic biliary stones. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W267-74.
  • 13 Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 1995;170:619-21.
  • 14 Widdison AL, Longstaff AJ, Armstrong CP. Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of gallstnes and bile duct stones: A prospective study. Br J Surg 1994;81:595-7.
  • 15 Menezes N, Marson LP, debeaux AC, Muir IM, Auld CD. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1176-81.