CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2009; 19(01): 78-80
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.45351
OBSTETRIC SYMPOSIUM

Fetal diastematomyelia: MR imaging: A case report

Makarand Kulkarni
Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
,
Mitosh Ruparel
Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
,
Rajeev Redkar
Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

MRI is increasingly being used in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies suspected on USG. The USG evaluation of fetal spinal anomalies is limited by acoustic shadowing, fetal position and the amount of liquor. Fetal MRI is able to show spinal anomalies well, as in our case of fetal diastematomyelia with a dorsal dermal sinus, suspected on USG at 28 weeks gestation.



Publication History

Article published online:
31 July 2021

© 2009. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 von Koch CS, Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Barkovich AJ. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of spinal cord anomalies in patients with sonographically detected bony anomalies of the spine. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:781-9.
  • 2 Has R, Yuksel A, Buyukkurt S, Kaleliogul I, Tatli B. Pre Natal Diagnosis of diastematomyelia: Presentation of eight cases and review of literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gyanecol 2007;30:845-9.
  • 3 Whitby EH, Paley MN, Griffiths PD. Review magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus. Obstet Gynaecol 2006;8:71-7.
  • 4 Levine D, Barnes PD, Robertson RR, Wong G, Mehta TS. Fast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Radiology 2003;229:51-61.
  • 5 Reeves MJ, Whitby EH, Paley MN, Griffiths PD. The current role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Fetal Mat Med Rev 2008;19:33-60.
  • 6 Levine D, Barnes PD, Edelmen RR. Obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:609-17.
  • 7 Coakley FV, Glenn OA, Qayyum A, Barkovich AJ, Goldstein R, Filly RA. Fetal MRI: A developing technique for the developing patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:243-52.
  • 8 Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M. Split cord malformation: Part I: A unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 1992;31:451-80.
  • 9 Pang D. Split cord malformation: Part II: Clinical syndrome. Neurosurgery 1992;31:481-500.
  • 10 Fauchon D, Benzie RJ. Diastematomyelia: A case review. ASUM Ultrasound Bull 2005;8:40-1.
  • 11 Herman TE, Siegel MJ. Cervical and basicranial diastematomyelia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:806-8.