CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(01): 47-53
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.95404
GI Radiology

In the workup of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleed, does 64-slice MDCT have a role?

Chinmay Kulkarni
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
Srikanth Moorthy
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
K Sreekumar
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
R Rajeshkannan
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
P Nazar
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
C Sandya
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
S Sivasubramanian
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
,
P Ramchandran
Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Elamakkara, Cochin, Kerala, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to prospectively determine the sensitivity of 64-slice MDCT in detecting and diagnosing the cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleed (OGIB). Materials and Methods: Our study included 50 patients (male 30, female 20) in the age range of 3-82 years (average age: 58.52 years) who were referred to our radiology department as part of their workup for clinically evident gastrointestinal (GI) bleed or as part of workup for anemia (with and without positive fecal occult blood test). All patients underwent conventional upper endoscopy and colonoscopy before undergoing CT scan. Following a noncontrast scan, all patients underwent triple-phase contrast CT scan using a 64-slice CT scan system. The diagnostic performance of 64-slice MDCT was compared to the results of capsule endoscopy, 99m-technetium-labeled red blood cell scintigraphy (99mTc-RBC scintigraphy), digital subtraction angiography, and surgery whenever available. Results: CT scan showed positive findings in 32 of 50 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of MDCT for detection of bleed were 72.2%, 42.8%, 81.2%, and 44.4%, respectively. Capsule endoscopy was done in 15 patients and was positive in 10 patients; it had a sensitivity of 71.4%. Eleven patients had undergone 99mTc-RBC scintigraphy prior to CT scan, and the result was positive in seven patients (sensitivity 70%). Digital subtraction angiography was performed in only eight patients and among them all except one patient showed findings consistent with the lesions detected on MDCT. Conclusion: MDCT is a sensitive and noninvasive tool that allows rapid detection and localization of OGIB. It can be used as the first-line investigation in patients with negative endoscopy and colonoscopy studies. MDCT and capsule endoscopy have complementary roles in the evaluation of OGIB.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2021

© 2012. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Lewis BS. Small intestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1994;23:67-91.
  • 2 AGA. American gastroenterological association medical position statement: Evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2000;118:197.
  • 3 Concha R, Amaro R, Barkin JS. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007;41:242-51.
  • 4 Willmann JK, Roos JE, Platz A, Pfammater T, Hilfiker PR, Marincek B, et al. Multidetector CT: Detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:437-44.
  • 5 Yoon W, Jeong YY, Shin SS, Lim HS, Song SG, Jang NG, et al. Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: Detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 2006;239:160-7.
  • 6 Potter GD, Sellin JH. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1988;17:341-55.
  • 7 Rollins ES, Picus D, Hicks ME, Darcy MD, Bower BL, Kleinoffer MA. Angiography is useful in detection of source of chronic gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:385-8.
  • 8 Duchesne J, Jacome T, Serou M, Tighe D, Gonzales A, Hunt JP, et al. CT angiography for the detection of a lower gastrointestinal bleeding source. Am Surg 2005;71:392-7.
  • 9 Grassi R, di Mizio R, Romano S, Cappabianca S, del Vecchio W, Severini S. Multiple jejunal angiodysplasia detected by enema-helical CT. Clin Imaging 2000;24:61-3.
  • 10 Junquera F, Quiroga S, Saperas E, Perez-Lafuente M, Videla S, Alvarez-castells A, et al. Accuracy of helical computed tomographic angiography for diagnosis of colonic angiodysplasia. Gastroenterology 2000;119:293-9.
  • 11 Tew K, Davies RP, Jadun CK, Kew J. MDCT of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. AJR am J Roentgenol 2004;182:427-30.
  • 12 Miller FH, Hwang CM. An initial experience: Using helical Ct imaging to detect obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Imaging 2004;28:245-51.
  • 13 Dicle O, Goktay AY. Helical CT angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding. AJR am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1749.
  • 14 Mindelzun RE, Beaulieu CF. Using biphasic CT to reveal gastrointestinal arteriovenous malformations. AJR am J Roentgenol 1997;168:437-8.
  • 15 Yamaguchi T, Yoshikawa K. Enhanced CT for initial localization of active lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:634-6.
  • 16 Yoshikawa K, Yamaguti T, Nakamura M, Hirayabasi K, Hazano K, Udita M, et al. The role of dual-phase enhanced helical computed tomography in difficult intestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000;31:83-4.
  • 17 Boley SJ, Sprayregen S, Sammartano RJ, Adams A, Kleinhaus S. The pathophysiologic basis for the angiographic signs of vascular ectasias of the colon. Radiology 1997;125:615-21.
  • 18 Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, Alexander JA, Fidler JA, Burton SS, McCullough CH. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Evaluation with 64-slice multiphase CT enterography-initial experience. Radiology 2008;246:56-71.
  • 19 Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MH, Freund W, Schmitz BL, Aschoff AJ. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: Value of MDCT. Abdom Imaging 2007;33:285-93.
  • 20 Saperas E, Dot J, Videla S, Alvarez-Castells A, Perez-Lafuente M, Armengol JR, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus computed tomographic or standard angiography for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:731-7.
  • 21 Howarth DM, Tang K, Lees W. The clinical utility of nuclear medicine imaging for the detection of occult gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Nucl Med (Stuttg) 2002;23:591.
  • 22 McKusick KA, Froelich J, Callahan RJ, Winzelberg GG, Strauss HW. 99mTc red blood cells for detection of gastrointestinal bleeding: Experience with 80 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;137:1113-8.
  • 23 Ohri SK, Desa LA, Lee H, Patel T, Jackson J, Lavender JP, et al. Value of scintigraphic localization of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992;37:328.
  • 24 Szasz IJ, Morrison RT, Lyster DM. Technetium-99m-labelled red blood cell scanning to diagnose occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Can J Surg 1985;28:512.
  • 25 Voeller GR, Bungh G, Britt LG. Use of technetium-99m-labelled red blood cell 99mTc-RBC scintigraphy in the detection and management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Surgery 1991;110:799.
  • 26 Lau WY, Fan ST, Wong SH, Wong KP, Poon GP, Chu KW, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative localization of gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. Gut 1987;28:869.
  • 27 Lau WY, Ngan H, Chu KW, Yuen WK. Repeat selective visceral angiography in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. Br J Surg 1989;76:226.
  • 28 Kuhle WG, Sheiman RG. Detection of active colonic hemorrhage with use of helical CT: Findings in a swine model. Radiology 2003;228:743-52.