Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.105588
Comparison of the Lysis Centrifugation Method with the Conventional Blood Culture Method in Cases of Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Source of Support: Nil.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Physicians and microbiologists have long recognized that the presence of living microorganisms in the blood of a patient carries with it considerable morbidity and mortality. Hence, blood cultures have become critically important and frequently performed test in clinical microbiology laboratories for diagnosis of sepsis
Objectives: To compare the conventional blood culture method with the lysis centrifugation method in cases of sepsis.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred nonduplicate blood cultures from cases of sepsis were analyzed using two blood culture methods concurrently for recovery of bacteria from patients diagnosed clinically with sepsis – the conventional blood culture method using trypticase soy broth and the lysis centrifugation method using saponin by centrifuging at 3000 g for 30 minutes.
Results: Overall bacteria recovered from 200 blood cultures were 17.5%. The conventional blood culture method had a higher yield of organisms, especially Gram positive cocci. The lysis centrifugation method was comparable with the former method with respect to Gram negative bacilli. The sensitivity of lysis centrifugation method in comparison to conventional blood culture method was 49.75% in this study, specificity was 98.21% and diagnostic accuracy was 89.5%. In almost every instance, the time required for detection of the growth was earlier by lysis centrifugation method, which was statistically significant. Contamination by lysis centrifugation was minimal, while that by conventional method was high. Time to growth by the lysis centrifugation method was highly significant (P value 0.000) as compared to time to growth by the conventional blood culture method.
Conclusion: For the diagnosis of sepsis, combination of the lysis centrifugation method and the conventional blood culture method with trypticase soy broth or biphasic media is advocable, in order to achieve faster recovery and a better yield of microorganisms.
Publication History
Article published online:
09 May 2020
© 2012.
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Reimer LG, Wilson LM, Weinstein MP. Update on detection of bacteraemia and fungaemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:444-65.
- 2 Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:788-802.
- 3 Borriello SP, Murray RP, Funke G. In: Topley and Wilson′s Microbiology and Microbial Infections: Bacteriology. 10th ed. Vol. 1 and 2. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005. p. 509-54;811.
- 4 Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. In: Bailey and Scott′s Diagnostic Microbiology. 12th ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 871-83.
- 5 Henry NK, McLimans CA, Wright AJ, Thompson RL, Wilson WR. Washington JA 2 nd . Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube. J Clin Microbiol 1983;17:864-9.
- 6 Dorn GL, Land GA, Wilson GE. Improved blood culture technique based on centrifugation. clinical evaluation. J Clin Microbiol 1979;9:391-6
- 7 Kelly MT, Buck GE, Fojtasek MF. Evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation and biphasic bottle blood culture system during routine use. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:554-7.
- 8 Kiehn TE, Wong B, Edwards FF, Armstrong D. Comparative recovery of bacteria and yeasts from lysis-centrifugation and a conventional blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:300-4.
- 9 Henry NK, Grewell CM, Van Grevenhof PE, Ilstrup DM, Washington JA 2 nd . Comparison of lysis-centrifugation with a biphasic blood culture medium for the recovery of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1984;20:413-6.
- 10 Mantur BG, Mangalgi SS. Evaluation of conventional castaneda and lysis centrifugation blood culture techniques for diagnosis of human brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:4327-8.
- 11 David ST, Mukundan U, Brahmadathan KN, Jacob TJ. Detecting mycobacteraemia for diagnosing tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2004;119:259-66.
- 12 Sinha K, Tendolkar U, Mathur M. Comparison of Conventional Broth Blood Culture Technique and Manual Lysis Centrifugation Technique for Detection of Fungemia. Indian J Med Microbiol 2009;27:79-80.
- 13 Washington WC Jr, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Shreckenberger P, et al. In: Koneman′s Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 100-5,1219,1443-81.
- 14 Cheesbrough M. District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 127.
- 15 Shrestha P, Das BK, Bhatta NK, Jha DK, Das B, Setia A, et al. Clinical and Bacteriological Profiles of Blood Culture Positive Sepsis in Newborns. J Nepal Paediatr Soc 2007;27:64-7.
- 16 Ernst DJ. Controlling blood-culture contamination rates. MLO Med Lab Obs 2004;36:14-8;quiz 20-1.
- 17 Raja N, Parratt D, Meyers M. Blood culture contamination in a district general hospital in the UK: a 1 - year study. Healthc Infect 2009;14:95-100.
- 18 De A, Saraswathi K, Gogate A, Fernandes A. Bacteraemia In Hospitalised Children - A One Year Prospective Study. Indian J Med Microbiol 1995;13:72-5.