CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2013; 5(01): 42-45
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.115938
Original Article

Comparison of Various Culture Methods for Isolation of Group B Streptococcus from Intrapartum Vaginal Colonization

Kavitha P Konikkara
Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India
,
Shrikala Baliga
Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Suchitra M Shenoy
Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
,
B Bharati
American University of Antigua College of Medicine, New York, United States of America
› Author Affiliations
Source of Support: Financial support - Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - India. Ref. No. 3/2/06 – 07/ PG – thesis – MPD – 1.23 Dated 5/4/2007.

ABSTRACT

Aims: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is one of the most common causes of neonatal sepsis throughout the world. Reports of vaginal colonization of GBS in India are few and variable. A study was conducted on pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital to compare various methods for isolation of GBS, to study the prevalence of GBS in pregnant women in third trimester, and to determine risk factors for GBS colonization.

Settings and Design: Observational descriptive study.

Materials and Methods: High vaginal swabs from 150 pregnant women in their third trimester were used to compare three methods for isolation of GBS viz. direct culture on 5% Sheep Blood agar, direct culture on selective Columbia Blood Agar and culture in LIM enrichment broth with subsequent culture on 5% Sheep Blood agar. A history of associated risk factors was also taken.

Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed by Chi–square test.

Results: Isolation was best from LIM enrichment broth with subsequent culture on 5% Sheep Blood Agar. Prevalence of GBS colonization by using culture method was 12.67%. Most frequently associated risk factor was intrapartum fever (42.11%).

Conclusions: Standard Culture Method using LIM enrichment should be adopted as standard practice for isolation of GBS from vaginal swabs.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 April 2020

© 2013.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Gil EG, Rodriguez MC, Bartolome R, Berjano B, Cabero L, Andreu A. Evaluation of the Granada agar plate for detection of vaginal and rectal group B Streptococci in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2648-51.
  • 2 Edwards MS, Baker CJ. Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 2423-34.
  • 3 Schuchat A. Epidemiology of group B Streptococcal disease in United States: Shifting paradigms. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998;11:497-13.
  • 4 Sharmila V, Joseph NM, Arun Babu TA, Chaturvedula L, Sistla S. Genital tract group B Streptococcal colonization in pregnant women. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011;5:592-4.
  • 5 Kulkarni AA, Pawar SG, Dharmadhikari CA, Kulkarni RD. Colonization of pregnant women and their new born infants with group B Streptococci. Indian J Med Microbiol 2001;19:1-4.
  • 6 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B Streptococcal disease: Revised guidelines from CDC-United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59:1-32.
  • 7 Rallu F, Barriga P, Scrivo C, Martel-Laferriere V, Laferriere C. Sensitivities of antigen detection and PCR assays greatly increased compared to that of the standard culture method for screening for group B Streptococcus carriage in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:725-8.
  • 8 De Azavedo JC, McGavin M, Duncan C, Low DE, McGeer A. Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in invasive and noninvasive group B Streptococcus isolates from Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:3504-8.
  • 9 Ross PW. Streptococcus and Enterococcus. In: Collee JG, Marmion BP, Fraser AG, Simmons A, editors. Mackie and McCartney: Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 263 -272.
  • 10 Heelen JS, Struminsky J, Lauro P, Sung CJ. Evaluation of a new selective enrichment broth for detection of group B Streptococci in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:896-7.
  • 11 Kontnick CM, Edberg SC. Direct detection of group B Streptococci from vaginal specimens compared with quantitative culture. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:336-9.
  • 12 Heelan JS, Hasenbein ME, McAdam AJ. Resistance of group B Streptococcus to selected antibiotics including erythromycin and clindamycin. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:1263-4.
  • 13 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eighteenth informational supplement, document M100-S18; Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2008.
  • 14 Shet A, Ferrieri P. Neonatal and maternal group B Streptococcal infections: A comprehensive review. Indian J Med Res 2004;120:141-50.
  • 15 Yancey MK, Schuchat A, Brown LK, Ventura VL, Markenson GR. The accuracy of late antenatal screening cultures in predicting genital group B Streptococcal colonization at delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:811-15.
  • 16 Nomura ML, Junior RP, Oliveira UM. Selective versus non-selective culture medium for group B Streptococcus detection in pregnancies complicated by preterm labor or preterm-premature rupture of membranes. Braz J infect Dis 2006;10:247-50.
  • 17 Rita M, Sharad S, Srikanth N, Swarnarekha B, Ranjani S. Selective risk factor based screening of pregnant women for group B Streptococcal colonization in a teaching hospital in South India. J Obstet Gynecol India 2005;55:336-8.
  • 18 Schuchat A, Deaver-Robinson K, Plikaytis BD, Zangwill KM, Mohle-Boetani J, Wenger JD, et al. Multistate case-control study of maternal risk factors for neonatal group B Streptococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:623-9.
  • 19 Renee S, Kim D, Doreen M, Sheila R, Melissa M, Dele DH. Perinatal antibiotic usage and changes in colonization and resistance rates of group B Streptococcus and other pathogens. J Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:525-33.