Quality and Quantity of Extracted Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) from Preserved Soft Tissues of Putrefied Unidentifiable Human Corpse

ABSTRACT

Context: The appropriate collection and preservation of soft tissues from putrefied unidentifiable human corpse for the purpose of identification using DNA profiling technique is critically important especially in developing countries like India having different levels of health-care set ups with largely varying facilities and varying climatic conditions.

Aims: The present study was carried out, mainly focusing on quality and quantity of extracted DNA from the soft tissues of putrefied unidentifiable human corpse stored upto 4 weeks at 4°C and at −80°C for DNA analysis.

Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 16 different putrefied unidentifiable human corpses after getting approval from institutional ethical committee. Around 2 g of four different tissues (brain, kidney, heart and muscle) were collected and preserved for one month followed by DNA extraction using the organic method, the quality and quantity of high molecular weight-DNA was estimated using the spectrophotometer and gel electrophoresis. Further, the amplification polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also performed (AmpFLSTR^® Indentifiler™ PCR Amplification kit for multiple loci, of Applied Biosystems, Lab India) and was checked using continuous PAGE.

Results: The yield of DNA was significantly higher at −80°C for all the four tissues collected and was best for brain followed by heart, kidney and worst for muscles in all cases.

Conclusions: It is suggested that the brain tissue preserved at −80°C is the best among soft issues for DNA extraction. Refrigeration or deep freezing facility should be available at all the centers.

Key words:

DNA-profiling - putrefaction - soft tissues

Publication History

Article published online:
19 April 2020

• REFERENCES

• 1 Bomjen G, Raina A, Sulaiman IM, Hasnain SE, Dogra TD. Effect of various storage conditions of human tissues on DNA fingerprinting. J For Med Tox 1994; XI:1-6.
• 2 Hagelberg E, Gray IC, Jeffreys AJ. Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis. Nature 1991; 352:427-9.
• 3 Miazato Iwamura, Edna Sadayo Analysis of human DNA bone: Qualitative study of compact bone microstructure. Available from: http://www.openthesis.org/documents/Analysis-human-DNA-bone-qualitative-485260.html. [Last cited on 2011 Apr 15].
• 4 Jakubowska J, Maciejewska A, Pawłowski R. Comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from human bones with different degrees of degradation. Int J Legal Med 2012; 126:173-8.
• 5 Olaisen B, Stenersen M, Mevåg B. Identification by DNA analysis of the victims of the August 1996 Spitsbergen civil aircraft disaster. Nat Genet 1997; 15:402-5.
• 6 Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York: Publishers-Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
• 7 Hoff-Olsen P, Mevåg B, Staalstrøm E, Hovde B, Egeland T, Olaisen B. Extraction of DNA from decomposed human tissue. An evaluation of five extraction methods for short tandem repeat typing. Forensic Sci Int 1999; 105:171-83.
• 8 Raina A, Yadav BK, Lalwani S, Dogra TD. Effect of different preservatives on the human soft tissues stored at different temperatures and intervals of time for the isolation of DNA for DNA fingerprinting. Ind Int J For Med and Tox 2006; 4 (2). Available from: http://www.forensicindia.com/icfmt/web/vol4no2/human_soft_tissues.htm. [Last cited on 2013 Apr 12].
• 9 Huckenbeck W, Bonte W. DNA fingerprinting of freeze-dried tissues. Int J Legal Med 1992;105:39-41.
• 10 Ludes B, Pfitzinger H, Mangin P. DNA fingerprinting from tissues after variable postmortem periods. J Forensic Sci 1993;38:686-90.
• 11 Bär W, Hummel K. DNA fingerprinting: Its application in forensic case work. EXS 1991;58:349-55.
• 12 Bär W, Kratzer A, Mächler M, Schmid W. Postmortem stability of DNA. Forensic Sci Int 1988;39:59-70.
• 13 Rerkamnuaychoke B, Chantratita W, Jomsawat U, Thanakitgosate J, Pattanasak N, Rojanasunan P. Comparison of DNA extraction from blood stain and decomposed muscle in STR polymorphism analysis. J Med Assoc Thai 2000;83 Suppl 1:S82-8.
• 14 Haglund WD, Reay DT, Tepper SL. Identification of decomposed human remains by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) profiling. J Forensic Sci 1990;35:724-9.
• 15 Piasecka-Pazik D, Szczerkowska Z. Comparison of DNA extraction from blood stain and decomposed muscle in STR polymorphism analysis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2000;83 Suppl 1:S82-8.
• 16 Trindade-Filho A, Mendes C, Ferreira S, Oliveira S, Vasconcelos A, Maia F, et al. DNA obtained from decomposed corpses cartilage: A comparison with skeleton muscle source. Forensic Sci Int: Genet Suppl Series, 2008;1:459-61.
• 17 Shintani-Ishida K, Harada K, Nakajima M, Yoshida K. Usefulness of blood vessels as a DNA source for PCR-based genotyping based on two cases of corpse dismemberment. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2010;12:8-12.
• 18 Roeper A, Reichert W, Mattern R. The Achilles tendon as a DNA source for STR typing of highly decayed corpses. Forensic Sci Int 2007;173:103-6.
• 19 Allouche M, Hamdoum M, Mangin P, Castella V. Genetic identification of decomposed cadavers using nails as DNA source. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2008;3:46-9.