CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2014; 6(02): 109-113
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.141509
Original Article

Comparison of Epidemiological and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-Positive and Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-Negative Strains of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

Shikha Ranjan
Department of Microbiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Banashankari GS
Department of Microbiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
PR Sreenivasa Babu
Department of Microbiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Source of Support: Nil

ABSTRACT

Background: The infections caused by metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with higher rates of mortality, morbidity, and overall healthcare costs compared to non-MBL P. aeruginosa infections.

Purpose: To compare the epidemiologic factors and antibiograms of MBL-positive and MBL-negative P. aeruginosa isolates in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: In an observational study, from January 2011 to December 2012, all non-duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates were subjected to an antimicrobial sensitivity test against 10 antibiotics of five different classes. All P. aeruginosa strains showing resistance to at least one of the carbapenems were subjected to the MBL-E test. Epidemiological features and antibiograms of MBL-positive and MBL-negative strains were compared and statistically analyzed.

Results: Out of 350 isolates (total sample = 5330) of P. aeruginosa, MBL was detected in 58 isolates by the E-test, resulting in a prevalence of 16.57%. Resistance to most of the antibiotics was significantly higher in the MBL-positive strains with 100% resistance to ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, and meropenem, followed by imipenem (93.10%) and gentamicin (89.66%). The prevalence of multidrug-resistant and pandrug-resistant strains was significantly higher among the MBL group as compared to that in the non-MBL group ((55.17 vs. 7.88% (P < 0.0001) and 8.62 vs. 0.68% (P = 0.0006)), respectively.

Conclusions: MBL-positive P. aeruginosa strains showed very high resistance to various antibiotics, as compared to the non-MBL strains. Increasing prevalence of MBL-producing isolates in hospital settings makes it important to perform routine detection of MBL-positive P. aeruginosa strains by in vitro testing before antibiotic use, for the purposes of infection prevention, and control, and for minimizing the adverse outcomes of infections with MBL-producing strains.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 April 2020

© 2014.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009;22:582-610.
  • 2 Kali A, Srirangaraj S, Kumar S, Divya HA, Kalyani A, Umadevi S. Detection of metallo-beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units. Australas Med J 2013;6:686-93.
  • 3 Hammami S, Boutiba-Ben Boubaker I, Ghozzi R, Saidani M, Amine S, Ben Redjeb S. Nosocomial outbreak of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing VIM-2 metallo-beta-lactamase in a kidney transplantation unit. Diagn Pathol 2011;6:106.
  • 4 Kaleem F, Usman J, Hassan A, Khan A. Frequency and susceptibility pattern of metallo-beta-lactamase producers in a hospital in Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries 2010;4:810-3.
  • 5 Zavascki AP, Barth AL, Goncalves AL, Moro AL, Fernandes JF, Martins AF, et al. The influence of metallo-beta-lactamase production on mortality in nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:387-92.
  • 6 Laupland KB, Parkins MD, Church DL, Gregson DB, Louie TJ, Conly JM, et al. Population-based epidemiological study of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Calgary Health Region: Importance of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing strains. J Infect Dis 2005;192:1606-12.
  • 7 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disks Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard. 10th ed. CLSI document M02-A10. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2009.
  • 8 Navaneeth BV, Sridaran D, Sahay D, Belwadi MR. A preliminary study on metallo-beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients. Indian J Med Res 2002;116:264-7.
  • 9 Vitkauskienė A, Skrodenienė E, Dambrauskienė A, Bakšytė G, Macas A, Sakalauskas R. Characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units. Medicina (Kaunas) 2011;47:652-6.
  • 10 Arunagiri K, Sekar B, Sangeetha G, John J. Detection and characterization of metallo-beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by phenotypic and molecular methods from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital. West Indian Med J 2012;61:778-83.
  • 11 Hemalatha V, Sekar U, Kamat V. Detection of metallo betalactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients. Indian J Med Res 2005;122:148-52.
  • 12 Saderi H, Karimi Z, Owlia P, Bahar MA, Rad SM. Phenotypic detection of metallo-beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burned patients. Iran J Pathol 2008;3:20-4.
  • 13 Mihani F, Khosravi A. Isolation of P. aeruginosa strains producing metallo beta lactamases from infections in burned patients and identification of blaIMP and blaVIM genes by PCR. Iran J Med Microbiol 2007;1:23-31.
  • 14 Anupurba S, Bhattacharjee A, Garg A, Sen MR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Psuedomonas aeruginosa isolated from wound infections. Indian J Dermatol 2006;51:286-8.
  • 15 Varaiya A, Kulkarni N, Kulkarni M, Bhalekar P, Dogra J. Incidence of metallo beta lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in ICU patients. Indian J Med Res 2008;127:398-402.
  • 16 Hirakata Y, Yamaguchi T, Nakano M, Izumikawa K, Mine M, Aoki S, et al. Clinical and bacteriological characteristics of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:26-32.