PDF icon PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2016; 8(02): 071-076
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.180785
Original Article

Comparison Between Measured and Calculated Free Calcium Values at Different Serum Albumin Concentrations

Altaf Ahmad Mir‡
Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Bela Goyal‡
Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Sudip Kumar Datta
Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Saidaiah Ikkurthi
Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Arnab Pal
Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
› Institutsangaben
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar aufeRef
 als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints
Preview

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Free ionic calcium is the metabolically active component of total calcium (TCa) in blood. However, most laboratories report TCa levels that are dependent on serum albumin concentration. Hence, several formulae have evolved to calculate free calcium levels from TCa after adjustment for albumin. However, free calcium can directly be measured using direct ion selective electrodes rather than spectrophotometric methods used in autoanalyzers.

Objectives: This study compares the levels of free calcium obtained by measurement by direct ion selective electrode (ISE) and the one calculated as a function of TCa by formulae.

Materials and Methods: A total of 254 serum samples submitted to clinical biochemistry laboratory of a tertiary care hospital were analyzed for total protein, albumin, and TCa by standard spectrophotometric methods and for free calcium by direct ISE. Three commonly used formulae viz. Orrell, Berry et al. and Payne et al. were used to calculate adjusted TCa. Calculated free calcium was obtained by taking 50% of these values.

Results: A significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed between calculated free calcium by all the three formulae and measured free calcium estimated by direct ISE using paired t-test and Bland–Altman plots.

Conclusion: Formulae for predicting free calcium by estimating TCa and albumin lacks consistency in prediction and free calcium should be evaluated by direct measurement.

Key words:

Calculated calcium - free calcium - ISE


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. April 2020

© 2016.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Baird GS. Ionized calcium. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:696-701.
  • 2 Moore EW. Ionized calcium in normal serum, ultrafiltrates, and whole blood determined by ion-exchange electrodes. J Clin Invest 1970;49:318-34.
  • 3 Berry EM, Gupta MM, Turner SJ, Burns RR. Variation in plasma calcium with induced changes in plasma specific gravity, total protein, and albumin. Br Med J 1973;4:640-3.
  • 4 Marshall RW, Hodgkinson A. Calculation of plasma ionised calcium from total calcium, proteins and pH: Comparison with measured values. Clin Chim Acta 1983;127:305-10.
  • 5 Orrell DH. Albumin as an aid to the interpretation of serum calcium. Clin Chim Acta 1971;35:483-9.
  • 6 Parfitt AM. Letter: Correction of plasma calcium measurements. Br Med J 1974;1:520.
  • 7 Payne RB, Little AJ, Williams RB, Milner JR. Interpretation of serum calcium in patients with abnormal serum proteins. Br Med J 1973;4:643-6.
  • 8 Bushinsky DA, Monk RD. Electrolyte quintet: Calcium. Lancet 1998;352:306-11.
  • 9 Zeisler EB. Determination of diffusible serum calcium. Am J Clin Pathol 1954;24:588-93.
  • 10 Cochran M, Rumbelow B, Allen G. The relation between the ultrafiltrable calcium fraction and blood pH and concentrations of total plasma calcium, albumin, and globulin. Clin Chem 1998;44:1559-62.
  • 11 Minimum Specifications from Biological Variation Database. Available from: http://www.westgard.com›CLIA&Quality›QualityRequirements. [Last accessed on 2015 Jul 30].
  • 12 Ladenson JH, Lewis JW, Boyd JC. Failure of total calcium corrected for protein, albumin, and pH to correctly assess free calcium status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1978;46:986-93.
  • 13 Dickerson RN, Alexander KH, Minard G, Croce MA, Brown RO. Accuracy of methods to estimate ionized and "corrected" serum calcium concentrations in critically ill multiple trauma patients receiving specialized nutrition support. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2004;28:133-41.
  • 14 Szyfelbein SK, Drop LJ, Martyn JA. Persistent ionized hypocalcemia in patients during resuscitation and recovery phases of body burns. Crit Care Med 1981;9:454-8.
  • 15 Drop LJ, Laver MB. Low plasma ionized calcium and response to calcium therapy in critically ill man. Anesthesiology 1975;43:300-6.
  • 16 Zaloga GP, Chernow B, Cook D, Snyder R, Clapper M, O'Brian JT. Assessment of calcium homeostasis in the critically ill surgical patient. The diagnostic pitfalls of the McLean-Hastings nomogram. Ann Surg 1985;202:587-94.
  • 17 Byrnes MC, Huynh K, Helmer SD, Stevens C, Dort JM, Smith RS. A comparison of corrected serum calcium levels to ionized calcium levels among critically ill surgical patients. Am J Surg 2005;189:310-4.
  • 18 Labriola L, Wallemacq P, Gulbis B, Jadoul M. The impact of the assay for measuring albumin on corrected ('adjusted') calcium concentrations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1834-8.