Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2013; 07(03): 315-326
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.115416
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesive systems according to interaction with dentin

Luciana Andrea Salvio
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil
,
Vinicius Di Hipólito
2   Biomaterials Research Group, School of Dentistry, Bandeirante University of São Paulo, Anhanguera-Uniban, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Adriano Luis Martins
3   Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
,
Mario Fernando de Goes
4   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Materials and Methods: Ten human molars were ground to expose the dentin and then sectioned in four tooth-quarters. They were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the adhesive used: Two single-step self-etch adhesives - Adper Prompt (ADP) and Xeno III (XE), two two-step self-etching primer systems - Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Adhe SE (ADSE), and one one-step etch-and-rinse system - Adper Single Bond (SB). Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored tooth-quarters were stored in water at 37΀C for 24 h and then sectioned into beams (0.8 mm 2 in cross-section). Maximal microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS) was recorded (0.5 mm/min in crosshead speed). The results were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s test (α = 0.05). Thirty additional teeth were used to investigate the hybridization quality by SEM using silver methenamine or ammoniacal silver nitrate dyes. Results: SE reached significantly higher μ-TBS (P < 0.05); no significance was found between ADSE and XE (P > 0.05), and between SB and ADP (P > 0.05); ADSE and XE were significantly higher than SB and ADP (P < 0.05). The bonding interface of SB showed the most intense silver uptake. SE and ADSE showed more favorable hybridization quality than that observed for ADP and XE. Conclusions: The bond strength and hybridization quality were affected by the interaction form of the adhesives with dentin. The hybridization quality was essential to improve the immediate μ-TBS to dentin.

Key words:

Adhesive systems - ammoniacal silver nitrate - bond strength - hybrid layer - silver methenamine
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P. et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nakabayashi N, Pashley D. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Quintessence; Tokyo, Japan: 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M. et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent 2004; 32: 611-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30: 371-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 141-5
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L. et al. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 529-33
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Zhang SC, Kern M. The role of host-derived dentinal matrix metalloproteinases in reducing dentin bonding of resin adhesives. Int J Oral Sci 2009; 1: 163-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously?. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 255-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reis AF, Arrais CA, Novaes PD, Carvalho RM, De Goes MF, Giannini M. Ultramorphological analysis of resin-dentin interfaces produced with water-based single-step and two-step adhesives: Nanoleakage expression. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 90-8
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Reis AF, Giannini M, Pereira PN. Long-term TEM analysis of the nanoleakage patterns in resin-dentin interfaces produced by different bonding strategies. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1164-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reis A, Moura K, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, de Andrade AM, Loguercio AD. Durability of enamel bonding using one-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 181-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Di Hipolito V, de Goes MF, Carrilho MR, Chan DC, Daronch M, Sinhoreti MA. SEM evaluation of contemporary self-etching primers applied to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 203-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P. et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 175-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso PE, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 297-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 472-6
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A. et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 32-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shinohara MS, De Goes MF, Schneider LF, Ferracane JL, Pereira PN, Di Hipólito V. et al. Fluoride-containing adhesive: Durability on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1383-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Inokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y. Interfacial structure between dentin and seven dentin bonding systems revealed using argon ion beam etching. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 8-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lopes AL. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 1111-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Duarte RM, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Effect of time on tensile bond strength of resin cement bonded to dentine and low-viscosity composite. J Dent 2006; 34: 52-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fernando de Goes M, Montes MA. Evaluation of silver methenamine method for nanoleakage. J Dent 2004; 32: 391-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sarr M, Kane AW, Vreven J, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M. et al. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 94-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 6-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Li HP, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of long-term storage on nanoleakage. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 609-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gomori G. A new histochemical test for glycogen and mucin. Am J Clin Pathol 1946; 10: 177-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Matthiessen ME, Sogaard-Pedersen B, Romert P. Electron microscopic demonstration of non-mineralized and hypomineralized areas in dentin and cementum by silver methenamine staining of collagen. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 385-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Perdigao J, Moore KC, Swift Jr EJ. A scanning electron microscopy study of human dentin and its interaction with third-generation dentin bonding systems. Acta Microscopia 1992; 1: 193-203
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Garcia G, Fernandes KB, Garcia FC, D′Alpino PH, da Rocha Svizero N, Wang L. Solvent retention of contemporary commercial dentin bonding agents in a demineralized dentin matrix. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 293-7
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C. et al. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 525-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 132-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gregoire G, Dabsie F, Dieng-Sarr F, Akon B, Sharrock P. Solvent composition of one-step self-etch adhesives and dentine wettability. J Dent 2011; 39: 30-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P. et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005; 24: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Peters MC. Adhesive permeability affects composite coupling to dentin treated with a self-etch adhesive. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 610-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y. et al. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 183-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1412-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Yiu CK, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MR. et al. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5789-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Kaga M, Yawaka Y. Effect of water on bonding of one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 172-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A. et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H. et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-8
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Malacarne-Zanon J, de Andrade E, Silva SM, Wang L, de Goes MF, Martins AL, Narvaes-Romani EO. et al. Permeability of Dental Adhesives-A SEM Assessment. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 429-39
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Hybridization quality in cervical cementum and superficial dentin using current adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 584-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1652-8
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Tsuchiya S, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of hybridization on bond strength and adhesive interface after acid-base challenge using 4-META/MMA-TBB resin. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 185-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar