PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2014; 08(01): 032-037
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.126237
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Comparative analysis of three different filling techniques and the effects of experimental internal resorptive cavities on apical microleakage

Ali Keles
1   Department of Endodontics, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkiye
,
Fuat Ahmetoglu
1   Department of Endodontics, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkiye
,
Mevlut S. Ocak
1   Department of Endodontics, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkiye
,
Burak Dayi
2   Department of Conservative Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkiye
,
Alperen Bozkurt
3   Department of Endodontics, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkiye
,
Hasan Orucoglu
4   Department of Endodontics, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkiye
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing abilities of three different gutta-percha techniques in experimentally defective roots (EDR) and non-defective roots (NR). Materials and Methods: Sixty canine teeth were divided into six groups of ten; Group 1, NR + cold lateral condensation (CLC); Group 2, EDR + LC; Group 3, NR + BeeFill; Group 4, EDR + BeeFill; Group 5, NR + Thermafil; and Group 6, EDR + Thermafil. Apical leakage was measured using a computerized fluid filtration meter with a laser system. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that the CLC demonstrated more microleakage in the EDR than in the NR (P < 0.01). Thermafil demonstrated more microleakage in the NR than in the EDR (P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between the BeeFill groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that internal resorptive cavities can affect the apical sealing properties of different root canal filling techniques, with Thermafil ensuring the lowest apical microleakage.

Key words:

Internal resorption - microleakage - root canal filling techniques
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Schäfer E, Olthoff G. Effect of three different sealers on the sealing ability of both thermafil obturators and cold laterally compacted gutta-percha. J Endod 2002; 28: 638-42
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Gencoglu N, Yildirim T, Garip Y, Karagenc B, Yilmaz H. Effectiveness of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 836-42
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Patel S, Ricucci D, Durak C, Tay F. Internal root resorption: A review. J Endod 2010; 36: 1107-21
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rossi-Fedele G, Figueiredo JA, Abbott PV. Teeth with double internal inflammatory resorption: Report of two cases. Aust Endod J 2010; 36: 122-9
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Dadresanfar B, Khalilak Z, Shiekholeslami M, Afshar S. Comparative study of the sealing ability of the lateral condensation technique and the BeeFill system after canal preparation by the Mtwo NiTi rotary system. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 281-5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Alkahtani A, Al-Subait S, Anil S. An in vitro comparative study of the adaptation and sealing ability of two carrier-based root canal obturators. Scientific World Journal 2013; 2013: 532023
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Yilmaz Z, Karapinar SP, Ozcelik B. Efficacy of rotary Ni-Ti retreatment systems in root canals filled with a new warm vertical compaction technique. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 948-53
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Keles A, Ahmetoglu F, Uzun I. Quality of different gutta-percha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities: A micro-computed tomography study. Aust Endod J. doi: 10.1111/aej.12043 [In press].
  • 9 Collins J, Walker MP, Kulild J, Lee C. A comparison of three gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal irregularities. J Endod 2006; 32: 762-5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kulild J, Lee C, Dryden J, Collins J, Feil P. A comparison of 5 gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: e28-32
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Andreasen FM, Sewerin I, Mandel U, Andreasen JO. Radiographic assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 21-7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Goldberg F, Massone EJ, Esmoris M, Alfie D. Comparison of different techniques for obturating experimental internal resorptive cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16: 116-21
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Oruçoğlu H, Sengun A, Yilmaz N. Apical leakage of resin based root canal sealers with a new computerized fluid filtration meter. J Endod 2005; 31: 886-90
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Inan U, Aydemir H, Taşdemir T. Leakage evaluation of three different root canal obturation techniques using electrochemical evaluation and dye penetration evaluation methods. Aust Endod J 2007; 33: 18-22
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Karagenç B, Gençoglu N, Ersoy M, Cansever G, Külekçi G. A comparison of four different microleakage tests for assessment of leakage of root canal fillings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 110-3
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Ari H, Belli S, Gunes B. Sealing ability of Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) in conjunction with different obturation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e113-6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Yilmaz Z, Deniz D, Ozcelik B, Sahin C, Cimilli H, Cehreli ZC. et al. Sealing efficiency of BeeFill 2in1 and System B/Obtura II versus single-cone and cold lateral compaction techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: e51-5
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mahera F, Economides N, Gogos C, Beltes P. Fluid-transport evaluation of lateral condensation, ProTaper gutta-percha and warm vertical condensation obturation techniques. Aust Endod J 2009; 35: 169-73
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Inan U, Aydin C, Tunca YM, Basak F. In vitro evaluation of matched-taper single-cone obturation with a fluid filtration method. J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75: 123
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Xu Q, Ling J, Cheung GS, Hu Y. A quantitative evaluation of sealing ability of 4 obturation techniques by using a glucose leakage test. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: e109-13
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Chohayeb AA. Comparison of conventional root canal obturation techniques with Thermafil obturators. J Endod 1992; 18: 10-2
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Pommel L, Jacquot B, Camps J. Lack of correlation among three methods for evaluation of apical leakage. J Endod 2001; 27: 347-50
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Behr M, Hansmann M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 459-64
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Peerzada F, Yiu CK, Hiraishi N, Tay FR, King NM. Effect of surface preparation on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 624-33
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Makishi P, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Wei S, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Nanoleakage expression and microshear bond strength in the resin cement/dentin interface. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 393-401
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Anderson RW. A comparison of thermoplastic obturation techniques: Adaptation to the canal walls. J Endod 1997; 23: 703-6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 ElAyouti A, Kiefner P, Hecker H, Chu A, Löst C, Weiger R. Homogeneity and adaptation of endodontic fillings in root canals with enlarged apical preparation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: e141-6
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar