CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2014; 08(02): 261-264
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.130631
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effects of physical and morphological properties of roots on fracture resistance

Huseyin Ertas
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
,
Burak Sagsen
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Hakan Arslan
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
,
Ozgur Er
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
,
Elif Tarim Ertas
3   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine how physical and morphological properties affect the fracture resistance of roots, and which criteria are important for root specimen standardization in fracture resistance studies. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five freshly extracted human canine teeth were selected. Crowns were sectioned from the cement–enamel junction and the root lengths were set at 16 mm. Then they were prepared up to ProTaper F3 file. Each root was numbered and data were obtained by measuring mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions, volume, weight, and density. Tests for fracture strength were performed using an Instron Testing Machine (Instron Corp. MA, USA). The force was applied axially, angled at 45 degrees with a constant speed of 1 mm/min. For each sample, the force at the time of fracture was recorded in Newtons. Results were evaluated statistically using linear regression analysis. Results: Volume and weight of the roots had more effect than mesiodistal or buccolingual dimensions on root fracture resistance. Conclusions: In root fracture resistance studies, volume or weight of the roots must be standardized when distributing roots to groups.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992; 18: 440-3
  • 2 Uzunoglu E, Aktemur S, Uyanik MO, Durmaz V, Nagas E. Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on root fracture with respect to concentration at different time exposures. J Endod 2012; 38: 1110-3
  • 3 Topçuoğlu HS, Arslan H, Keleş A, Köseoğlu M. Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e528-32
  • 4 Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent 2013; 41: 207-15
  • 5 Borelli B, Sorrentino R, Zarone F, Ferrari M. Effect of the length of glass fiber posts on the fracture resistance of restored maxillary central incisors. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 79-83
  • 6 Er K, Tasdemir T, Siso SH, Celik D, Cora S. Fracture resistance of retreated roots using different retreatment systems. Eur J Dent 2011; 5: 387-92
  • 7 Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson JY, Trope M. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 646-52
  • 8 Ersev H, Yilmaz B, Pehlivanoğlu E, Ozcan-Çalişkan E, Erişen FR. Resistance to vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth with MetaSEAL. J Endod 2012; 38: 653-6
  • 9 Sagsen B, Er O, Kahraman Y, Akdogan G. Resistance to fracture of roots filled with three different techniques. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 31-5
  • 10 Dikbas I, Tanalp J, Ozel E, Koksal T, Ersoy M. Evaluation of the effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors incorporating fiber posts, composite cores and crown restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 62-9