Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(03): 366-369
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.184145
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

In vitro comparison of antibacterial properties of bioceramic-based sealer, resin-based sealer and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer and two mineral trioxide aggregates

Gurpreet Singh
1   Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Iti Gupta
1   Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Faheim M. M. Elshamy
2   Department of Dental Materials, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Nezar Boreak
1   Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Husham Elraih Homeida
3   Department of Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jizan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 September 2019 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Objective: Our goal of the study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties of endodontic sealers against the E. faecalis. Materials and Methods: Six millimeters wells were made for each material in all the preinoculated petri plates. Then, the petri plates were incubated for 24 h. The zones of inhibition appeared were measured, and the measurements were put to statistical analysis. Results: EndoSequence BC Sealer, MM-mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and ProRoot MTA showed maximum means of diameter of zones of inhibition, whereas MM-seal and Endoseal did not show any zones of inhibition. Conclusion: EndoSequence BC Sealer was found to be a better endodontic sealer as compared to resin-based and zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer.