CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2017; 11(01): 036-040
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.202635
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Lightness, chroma, and hue distributions in natural teeth measured by a spectrophotometer

Teuta Pustina-Krasniqi
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Branch, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina ”Hasan Prishtina”, Kosovo
,
Kujtim Shala
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Branch, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina ”Hasan Prishtina”, Kosovo
,
Gloria Staka
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Branch, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina ”Hasan Prishtina”, Kosovo
,
Teuta Bicaj
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Branch, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina ”Hasan Prishtina”, Kosovo
,
Enis Ahmedi
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Branch, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina ”Hasan Prishtina”, Kosovo
,
Linda Dula
1   Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Branch, Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina ”Hasan Prishtina”, Kosovo
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the distribution of color parameters, lightness (L*), chroma (C), hue (H), a* and b*, in the intercanine sector in maxilla. Material and Methods: Patients' tooth color measurements were performed using an intraoral spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade® (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co. KG, Bad Sackingen, Germany). The measurements were made in 255 subjects in the intercanine sector in maxilla. Results: The mean values for the group of 255 subjects were as follows: L*, a*, b*, C, and H as 81.6, 0.67, 21.6, 21.7, and 92.7, respectively. For F=206.27 and P < 0.001 between L*, a*, b*, C, H, and central incisor/lateral incisor/canines, there were statistically significant differences. Conclusion: With the statistical analysis, it was determined that there are significant color differences between the teeth of the intercanine sector, which differences are clinically significant also.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Joiner A. Tooth colour: A review of the literature. J Dent 2004; 32 (Suppl. 01) 3-12
  • 2 ten Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 374-80
  • 3 Vaarkamp J, ten Bosch JJ, Verdonschot EH. Propagation of light through human dental enamel and dentine. Caries Res 1995; 29: 8-13
  • 4 Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 535-42
  • 5 Karadas M, Seven N. The effect of different drinks on tooth color after home bleaching. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 249-53
  • 6 Cho BH, Lim YK, Lee YK. Comparison of the color of natural teeth measured by a colorimeter and shade vision system. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1307-12
  • 7 CIE (Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage). Colorimetry – Technical Report. CIE Pub. No. 15. 3rd ed. Vienna: Bureau Central de la CIE; 2004
  • 8 Hammad IA. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 50-3
  • 9 Ahmad I. Colour and shade analysis. Protocols for Predictable Aesthetic Dental Restorations. Ch. 4. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2006: 77-97
  • 10 Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic Color Training in Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004
  • 11 Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006: 28-31
  • 12 Choi JH, Park JM, Ahn SG. Comparative study of visual and instrumental analyses of shade selection. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mat Sci 2010; 25-62
  • 13 van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 155-62
  • 14 Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window colour measurement, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 1133-42
  • 15 http://documents.mx/documents/vita-easyshade-operating-manual.html [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 02].
  • 16 Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs. spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: A clinical comparison. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 222-31
  • 17 O'Brien WJ, Hemmendinger H, Boenke KM, Linger JB, Groh CL. Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 179-85
  • 18 Zoric EK, Žaga M, Zlataric DK. Influence of gender on the patient's assessment of restorations on the upper anterior teeth. Acta Stomatol Croat 2014; 48: 33-41
  • 19 Sykora O. Fabrication of a posterior shade guide for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 287-8
  • 20 O'Brien WJ, Oh WS, Piché PW. Color parameters of the chromascop shade guide. Dent J 2013; 1: 3-11
  • 21 Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 642-8
  • 22 Wee AG, Monaghan P, Johnston WM. Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 657-66
  • 23 Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent 2010; 38 (Suppl. 02) e2-16
  • 24 Elamin HO, Abubakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Identifying the tooth shade in group of patients using Vita Easyshade. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 213-7