Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer 2015; 04(02): 061-064
DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.155637
MINI SYMPOSIUM: HEAD AND NECK ONCOLOGY: Original Article

Locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Barriers related to effective treatment

K. C. Lakshmaiah
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
T. M. Suresh
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
K. Govind Babu
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
Nagesh T. Sirsath
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
Lokanatha Dasappa
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
Linu Jacob Abraham
Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
› Author Affiliations Source of Support: Nill.
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: Oral cavity cancer is a significant health problem in India. Majority of patients present with locally advanced disease requiring multimodality treatment. Compliance to recommended treatment is an important factor affecting outcome. Aims: The aim was to evaluate the outcome of locally advanced oral cavity cancer patients with regards to treatment adherence and to assess reasons of noncompliance. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study. We included patients referred to Department of Medical Oncology for induction chemotherapy in view of locally advanced oral cavity cancer. Results: Only 15 (26%) patients completed planned treatment schedule. Their 1 year overall survival was 93%. The remaining 43 patients who received inadequate treatment had a dismal 21% 1 year overall survival. Illiteracy, poverty, long waiting list for surgery, prolonged delay for health scheme treatment plan approval and dissatisfaction with attitude of hospital staffs are major barriers related to effective treatment of these patients. Conclusions: A detailed discussion with patient and their relatives regarding recommended treatment, proper implementation of health schemes, increasing trained manpower to avoid long waiting list for surgery, provision of additional financial support for family member accompanying the patient and a sympathetic approach toward patients are needed to help these patients overcome the battle.

Key words

Induction - locally advanced - oral cavity


Publication History

Article published online:
31 December 2020

© 2015. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 GLOBOCAN 2012 (IARC). Section of Cancer Information. Available from: . [Last accessed 2013 April12].
  • 2 Guidelines for Management of Buccal Mucosa Cancer. Available from: . [Last accessed on 2012 Apr 14].
  • 3 Patil VM, Noronha V, Joshi A, Muddu VK, Gulia S, Bhosale B, et al. Induction chemotherapy in technically unresectable locally advanced oral cavity cancers: Does it make a difference? Indian J Cancer 2013;50:1-8.
  • 4 Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, Villaret DB, Siemann DW. Postoperative radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol 2003;24:41-50.
  • 5 Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified Kuppuswamy′s Socioeconomic Scale: Social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med 2013;38:185-6.
  • 6 Khandekar PS, Bagdey PS, Tiwari RR. Oral cancer and some epidemiological factors: A hospital based study. Indian J Community Med 2006;31:157-9.
  • 7 Kumar S, Heller RF, Pandey U, Tewari V, Bala N, Oanh KT. Delay in presentation of oral cancer: A multifactor analytical study. Natl Med J India 2001;14:13-7.
  • 8 Conway DI, Petticrew M, Marlborough H, Berthiller J, Hashibe M, Macpherson LM. Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2811-9.
  • 9 Zygogianni AG, Kyrgias G, Karakitsos P, Psyrri A, Kouvaris J, Kelekis N, et al. Oral squamous cell cancer: Early detection and the role of alcohol and smoking. Head Neck Oncol 2011;3:2.
  • 10 Znaor A, Brennan P, Gajalakshmi V, Mathew A, Shanta V, Varghese C, et al. Independent and combined effects of tobacco smoking, chewing and alcohol drinking on the risk of oral, pharyngeal and esophageal cancers in Indian men. Int J Cancer 2003;105:681-6.
  • 11 Do KA, Johnson MM, Doherty DA, Lee JJ, Wu XF, Dong Q, et al. Second primary tumors in patients with upper aerodigestive tract cancers: Joint effects of smoking and alcohol (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:131-8.
  • 12 Zygogianni A, Kyrgias G, Mystakidou K, Antypas C, Kouvaris J, Papadimitriou C, et al. Potential role of the alcohol and smoking in the squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Review of the current literature and new perspectives. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:339-44.
  • 13 Wei Y, Xiao J, Zou L. Masticator space: CT and MRI of secondary tumor spread. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:488-97.
  • 14 Ghoshal S, Mallick I, Panda N, Sharma SC. Carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: Analysis of clinical presentation, outcome and prognostic factors. Oral Oncol 2006;42:533-9.
  • 15 Nair MK, Sankaranarayanan R, Padmanabhan TK. Evaluation of the role of radiotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Cancer 1988;61:1326-31.
  • 16 Agarwal JP, Nemade B, Murthy V, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, Gupta T, et al. Hypofractionated, palliative radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2008;89:51-6.