Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2013; 2(03): 281-285
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.116008
Original Article

Evaluation of bond strength between glass fiber and resin composite using different protocols for dental splinting

Amaral R. Fabrício
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP University, Estadual Paulista, Switzerland
,
Queiroz C. José Renato
1   Department of Physics, Aeronautical Institute of Technology, São José dos Campos, Estadual Paulista, Switzerland
,
Leite P. P. Fabíola
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Faculty of Dentistry, Estadual Paulista, Switzerland
,
Reskalla N. J. F. Helcio
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Faculty of Dentistry, Estadual Paulista, Switzerland
,
Rodrigo Furtado de Carvalho
3   Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São José dos Campos Dental School, UNESP University, Estadual Paulista, Switzerland
,
Özcan Mutlu
4   Department of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, Head of Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Zürich, Rämistrasse, Zürich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
 PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Context: Many different polymeric materials to chair-side application on pre-impregnated glass fibers (PGF) are available and different protocols are used in clinical procedure. Aims: This study evaluated protocols used for dental splinting on adhesion between PGF and resin. Settings and Design: 42 pair of nano composite resin blocks with (6 × 6 × 8) mm 3 were assigned into seven groups (n=6) and bonded according to the protocol: Gar) adhesive, resin; Ggr) glass fiber, resin; Ggar) glass fiber, adhesive, resin; Gfgar) flowable resin, glass fiber, adhesive, resin; Ggafr) glass fiber, adhesive, flowable resin, resin; Ggfar) glass fiber, flowable resin, adhesive, resin; Gfgr) flowable resin, glass fiber, resin. Materials and Methods: Micro sticks obtained from each group were submitted to the micro tensile bond strength test. Statistical Analysis: The data were statistically evaluated using ANOVA and Tukey`s test (5%). Results: The protocol had a significant effect on the bond strength results (P=0.00). Gar and Ggar resulted in the highest bond strength with no statistical difference. Conclusions: The use of adhesive agent showed to be efficient to promote initial adhesion between fiber and nano composite resin.

Keywords

Adhesion - bond strength - fiber - resin composite - resin flow


Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2013. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Strength of adhesive-bonded fiber-reinforced composites to enamel and dentin substrates. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:301-11.
  • 2 Meiers JC, Kazemi RB, Donadio M. The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:388-93.
  • 3 Heinz B. Fabrication and strategic significance of a special resin composite splint in advanced periodontitis. Quintessence Int 1996;27:41-51.
  • 4 Scribante A, Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF. Effect of various adhesive systems on the shear bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:224-7.
  • 5 Foek DL, Ozcan M, Krebs E, Sandham A. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: Stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:381-90.
  • 6 Behr M, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced composite using a vacuum/pressure or a manual adaptation manufacturing process. J Dent 2000;28:509-14.
  • 7 Ellakwa AE, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:485-90.
  • 8 Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The shear bond strength of bidirectional and random-oriented fibre-reinforced composite to tooth structure. J Dent 2005;33:509-16.
  • 9 Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber orientation on the polymerization shrinkage strain of fiber-reinforced composites. Dent Mater 2006;22:610-6.
  • 10 Meriç G, Dahl JE, Ruyter IE. Cytotoxicity of silica-glass fiber reinforced composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:1201-6.
  • 11 Pukánszky B. Interfaces and interphases in multicomponent materials: Past, present, future. Eur Polym J 2005;41:645-62.
  • 12 Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-6.
  • 13 Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Dyer SR, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of particulate-filler composite to differently oriented fiber-reinforced composite substrate. J Prosthodont 2007;16:10-7.
  • 14 Lastumäki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of light-curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials 2002;23:4533-9.
  • 15 Brauchli L, Pintus S, Steineck M, Lüthy H, Wichelhaus A. Shear modulus of 5 flowable composites to the EverStick ortho fiber-reinforced composite retainer: An in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:54-8.
  • 16 Hinckfuss SE, Messer LB. Splinting duration and periodontal outcomes for replanted avulsed teeth: A systematic review. Dent Traumatol 2009;25:150-7.
  • 17 Kumbuloglu O, Aksoy G, User A. Rehabilitation of advanced periodontal problems by using a combination of a glass fiber-reinforced composite resin bridge and splint. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:67-70.
  • 18 Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: A systematic review. J Orthod 2006;33:205-12.