Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2017; 6(02): 77-81
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.206376
Original Article

Surface treatment on the shear bond strength of dental ceramics to titanium commercially pure

Rodrigo Galo
Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina, Brazil
,
Deborah Ganga Frizzas
1   Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
1   Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
1   Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos
1   Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate ceramic/titanium shear bond strength and microstructure of two commercially dental ceramics. Materials and Methods: Ceramic/titanium bond strength (6.0 mm × 2.0 mm) was measured using a universal testing machine. The load was applied with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. The titanium received different modifications for commercially pure titanium (airborne-particle abrasion and acid and thermic treatment). Results: All specimens showed different features within the interfacial area according to the different kinds of surface treatment. The tensile bond strength showed significant difference among the ceramics and surface treatment where the acid treatment groups had least means bond strength as differences between ceramic groups (P = 0.03). Conclusion: It was concluded that the use of acid solutions did not improve titanium-ceramic bonding strength values and the combination of airborne-particle abrasion and thermic treatment produced the most significant improvement in the titanium-ceramic bonding.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. November 2021

© 2017. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Adachi M, Mackert JR Jr., Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti-6Al-4V aloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-5.
  • 2 Könönen M, Kivilahti J. Fusing of dental ceramics to titanium. J Dent Res 2001;80:848-54.
  • 3 Troia MG Jr., Henriques GE, Mesquita MF, Fragoso WS. The effect of surface modifications on titanium to enable titanium-porcelain bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:28-33.
  • 4 Dérand T, Herø H. Bond strength of porcelain on cast vs. wrought titanium. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:184-8.
  • 5 Pang IC, Gilbert Jl, Chai J, lautenschlager EP. Bonding characteristics of low-fusing porcelain bonded to pure titanium and paladium-copper aloy. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:17-25.
  • 6 Pröbster l, Maiwald U, Weber H. Three-point bending strength of ceramics fused to cast titanium. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:313-9.
  • 7 low D, Sumii T, Swain M. Thermal expansion coefficient of titanium casting. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:239-42.
  • 8 Atsü S, Berksun S. Bond strength of three porcelains to two forms of titanium using two firing atmospheres. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:567-74.
  • 9 Reyes MJ, Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco T, Hovijitra S, Brown D. Titanium-porcelain system. Part III: Effects of surface modification on bond strengths. Biomed Mater Eng 2001;11:117-36.
  • 10 Oshida Y, Hashem A. Titanium-porcelain system. Part I: Oxidation kinetics of nitrided pure titanium, simulated to porcelain firing process. Biomed Mater Eng 1993;3:185-98.
  • 11 Wang RR, Fung KK. Oxidation behavior of surface-modified titanium for titanium-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:423-34.
  • 12 Sadeq A, Cai Z, Woody RD, Miler AW. Effects of interfacial variables on ceramic adherence to cast and machined commercialy pure titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:10-7.
  • 13 Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental aloys: Volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. Dent Mater 1993;9:151-61.
  • 14 Gilbert Jl, Covey DA, lautenschlager EP. Bond characteristics of porcelain fused to miled titanium. Dent Mater 1994;10:134-40.
  • 15 Miyakawa O, Watanabe K, Okawa S, Kanatani M, Nakano S, Kobayashi M. Surface contamination of titanium by abrading treatment. Dent Mater J 1996;15:11-21.
  • 16 Galo R, Ribeiro RF, Rodrigues RC, Pagnano Vde O, de Mattos Mda G. Effect of laser welding on the titanium composite tensile bond strength. Braz Dent J 2009;20:403-9.
  • 17 Galo R, Frizzas DG, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF, de Mattos MG. Shear bond strength of dental ceramics to cast commercialy pure titanium. Braz J Oral Sci 2010;9:362-5.
  • 18 Andrade Tarozzo lS, Chiarelo De Mattos Mda G, Faria Ribeiro R, Semprini M. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as alternatives to porcelain in fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:572-8.
  • 19 Kim JT, Cho SA. The effects of laser etching on shear bond strength at the titanium ceramic interface. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:101-6.
  • 20 Cai Z, Bunce N, Nunn ME, Okabe T. Porcelain adherence to dental cast CP titanium: Effects of surface modifications. Biomaterials 2001;22:979-86.
  • 21 Al Hussaini I, Al Wazzan KA. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercialy pure titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:350-6.
  • 22 Kimura H, Horng CJ, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Oxidation effects on porcelain-titanium interface reactions and bond strength. Dent Mater J 1990;9:91-9.
  • 23 Kely M, Asgar K, O’Brien WJ. Tensile strength determination of the interface between porcelain fused to gold. J Biomed Mater Res 1969;3:403-8.