Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2020; 4(02): 096-101
DOI: 10.4103/AJIR.AJIR_27_20
Original Article

Foundation Doctors’ Exposure to Interventional Radiology in Two Large Teaching Hospitals in the United Kingdom

Zaid Alsafi
Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
,
Sanjeev Ramachandran
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
,
Vamsee Bhrugubanda
Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
,
Alison Graham
Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
,
Ali Alsafi
Department of Imaging, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London
› Author Affiliations Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
› Further Information
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Background: Significant efforts have been made to improve medical students' exposure to interventional radiology (IR). Foundation doctors in the UK, however, are a neglected group, with little being done engage these doctors who are at a crucial juncture in their training. Objectives: The objective of the study is to assess Foundation Year 1 (FY1) doctors' understanding of and exposure to IR. Methods: FY1s from two teaching hospitals in the UK at the end of their first year of Foundation training were invited to take part in an 18-question survey, including 14 single-best-answer (SBA) questions. The questions examined knowledge of IR and other specialties. The SBAs were scored out 14 and the Student's t-test was used to compare IR and non-IR scores. Results: Questionnaires were given to 72 FY1 doctors and 52 (72.2%) were completed. The median score was 9/14 (64.3%) [4.5/14–12/14]. Questions relating to coronary intervention and neurosurgery scored best (96.2% and 94.3%, respectively). The mean score for IR-related questions was significantly lower than that for non-IR questions (51.5% vs. 81.1%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Participants who referred patients to IR at least once per month scored higher than those who rarely referred (60.5% vs. 47.2%, respectively, P < 0.0084). Nearly 83.0% of participants expressed a desire to gain more exposure to IR. Conclusion: Although Foundation doctors have some understanding of IR, reflecting some exposure to the specialty, this remains deficient when compared with their knowledge of other specialties. This may be improved by the introduction of IR specific teaching during the Foundation program.

Foundation program - interventional radiology - medical education - radiology - training

Appendix



Publication History

Received: 11 June 2020
Received: 21 June 2020

Accepted: 07 July 2020

Article published online:
26 March 2021

© 2020. The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Rösch J, Keller FS, Kaufman JA. The birth, early years, and future of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:841-53.
  • 2 The Royal College of Radiologists. Investing in the Interventional Radiology Workforce: The Quality and Efficiency Case; 2014. Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/investing-interventional-radiology-workforce-quality-and-efficiency-case. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 12].
  • 3 The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology UK WORKFORCE Census 2017 Report; 2017. Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr185_cr_census_2017.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 03, Last cited on 2019 Feb 03].
  • 4 The Royal College of Radiologists. Provision of Interventional Radiology Services; 2014. Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/provision-interventional-radiology-services. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 12].
  • 5 Emin EI, Ruhomauly Z, Theodoulou I, Hanrahan JG, Staikoglou N, Nicolaides M, et al. Are interventional radiology and allied specialities neglected in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019;40:22-30.
  • 6 de Gregorio MA, Guirola JA, Sierre S, Serrano-Casorran C, Gimeno MJ, Urbano J. Interventional radiology and Spanish medical students: A survey of knowledge and interests in preclinical and clinical courses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018;41:1590-8.
  • 7 Lee AM, Lee MJ. Teaching IR to medical students: A call to action. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018;41:203-5.
  • 8 Shaikh M, Shaygi B, Asadi H, Thanaratnam P, Pennycooke K, Mirza M, et al. The introduction of an undergraduate interventional radiology (IR) curriculum: Impact on medical student knowledge and interest in IR. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016;39:514-21.
  • 9 British Society of Interventional Radiology. Undergraduate IR Curriculum; 2016. Available from: http://www.bsir.org/bsirt/undergraduate-ir-curriculum/. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 09].
  • 10 Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Interventional Radiology Curriculum for Medical Students 2019. Available from: https://www.cirse.org/students/ir-curriculum-for-students/. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 16; Last updated on 2019 May 14].
  • 11 Alsafi Z, Bhrugubanda V, Ramachandran S, Alsafi A, Hamady M. Is it Time for a Specific Undergraduate Interventional Radiology Curriculum? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017;40:1062-9.
  • 12 Goldman DT, Magnowski A, Rochon PJ, Bream PR Jr, Kondo KL, Peters G, et al. The state of medical student teaching of interventional radiology: Implications for the future. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:1761-4.