Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality control in a clinical chemistry laboratory

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Six Sigma is one of the most popular quality management system tools employed for process improvement. The Six Sigma methods are usually applied when the outcome of the process can be measured. This study was done to assess the performance of individual biochemical parameters on a Sigma Scale by calculating the sigma metrics for individual parameters and to follow the Westgard guidelines for appropriate Westgard rules and levels of internal quality control (IQC) that needs to be processed to improve target analyte performance based on the sigma metrics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study, and data required for the study were extracted between July 2015 and June 2016 from a Secondary Care Government Hospital, Chennai. The data obtained for the study are IQC - coefficient of variation percentage and External Quality Assurance Scheme (EQAS) - Bias% for 16 biochemical parameters.

RESULTS: For the level 1 IQC, four analytes (alkaline phosphatase, magnesium, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) showed an ideal performance of ≥6 sigma level, five analytes (urea, total bilirubin, albumin, cholesterol, and potassium) showed an average performance of <3 sigma level and for level 2 IQCs, same four analytes of level 1 showed a performance of ≥6 sigma level, and four analytes (urea, albumin, cholesterol, and potassium) showed an average performance of <3 sigma level. For all analytes <6 sigma level, the quality goal index (QGI) was <0.8 indicating the area requiring improvement to be imprecision except cholesterol whose QGI >1.2 indicated inaccuracy.

CONCLUSION: This study shows that sigma metrics is a good quality tool to assess the analytical performance of a clinical chemistry laboratory. Thus, sigma metric analysis provides a benchmark for the laboratory to design a protocol for IQC, address poor assay performance, and assess the efficiency of existing laboratory processes.

Keywords

Bias - internal quality control - quality goal index - Six Sigma - Westgard rule

Publication History

Received: 03 June 2017

Accepted: 08 September 2017

Article published online:
19 February 2020

• REFERENCES

• 1 Westgard JO. Internal quality control: Planning and implementation strategies. Ann Clin Biochem 2003;40:593-611.
• 2 Coskun A, Inal T, Unsal I, Serteser M. Six Sigma as a Quality Management Tool: Evaluation of Performance in Laboratory Medicine Quality Management and Six Sigma. InTechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia; 2010. p. 248-61.
• 3 Angmo D, Kant S. Six sigma implementation in healthcare industry: Past, present and future. Int J Eng Res Technol 2015;4:1078-82.
• 4 Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, Leigh E, Picaso L, Morgan T, et al. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:516-9.
• 5 Westgard JO, Westgard SA. An assessment of σ metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. J Vet Diagn Invest 2008;20:536-44.
• 6 International Organization for Standardization. Medical Laboratories – Particular Requirements for Quality and Competence. ISO 15189. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2007.
• 7 Westgard JO. Six Sigma Quality Design and Control. 2^nd ed. Madison, WI: Westgard QC Inc.; 2006.
• 8 Singh B, Goswami B, Gupta VK, Chawla R, Mallika V. Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance in clinical biochemistry laboratory in India: A Pilot study. Indian J Clin Biochem 2011;26:131-5.
• 9 Nanda SK, Ray L. Quantitative application of sigma metrics in medical biochemistry. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2689-91.
• 10 Garber C. Six sigma, its role in the clinical laboratory, from basic to advanced series Clin Lab News 2004:10-4.