CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2018; 10(04): 397-400
DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_45_18
Original Article

Evaluation of mean monocyte volume in septicemia caused by Salmonella species

Dilip Kumar
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Lab Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Madhusoodanan Sudha
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Lab Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Bansidhar Tarai
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Lab Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Poonam Das
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Lab Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the significance of volume, conductivity, and scatter (VCS) parameters of monocytes in Salmonella infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected peripheral blood samples of 52 patients whose blood culture was positive for Salmonella species (Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi A) and analyzed VCS parameters by subjecting them to differential count in hematology analyzer LH750 (Beckman Coulter). Out of these, we studied VCS parameters of monocytes in Salmonella infection and compared with two control groups (control 1: other infections and control 2: normal subjects).

RESULTS: Mean monocyte volume (MMV), standard deviation (SD) of MMV, and SD of mean channel monocyte conductivity were found to be significantly increased in Salmonella infection (P < 0.05) when compared with both controls. We propose a cutoff value of 185 for MMV with sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 73%, respectively, to predict Salmonella infection.

CONCLUSIONS: MMV can be a useful tool for predicting Salmonella infection under appropriate clinical settings.



Publication History

Received: 03 April 2018

Accepted: 05 August 2018

Article published online:
20 February 2020

© 2018.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Ward PC. The CBC at the turn of the millennium: An overview. Clin Chem 2000;46:1215-20.
  • 2 Sullivan E. Hematology analyzer: From workhorse to thoroughbred. Lab Med 2006;37:274-8.
  • 3 Lehner J, Greve B, Cassens U. Automation in haematology. Transfus Med Hemother 2006;34:328-39.
  • 4 Chaves F, Tierno B, Xu D. Quantitative determination of neutrophil VCS parameters by the coulter automated hematology analyzer: New and reliable indicators for acute bacterial infection. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;124:440-4.
  • 5 Lee AJ, Kim SG. Mean cell volumes of neutrophils and monocytes are promising markers of sepsis in elderly patients. Blood Res 2013;48:193-7.
  • 6 Mardi D, Fwity B, Lobmann R, Ambrosch A. Mean cell volume of neutrophils and monocytes compared with C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and white blood cell count for prediction of sepsis and nonsystemic bacterial infections. Int J Lab Hematol 2010;32:410-8.
  • 7 Wain J, Hosoglu S. The laboratory diagnosis of enteric fever. J Infect Dev Ctries 2008;2:421-5.
  • 8 Olsen SJ, Pruckler J, Bibb W, Nguyen TM, Tran MT, Nguyen TM, et al. Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for typhoid fever. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:1885-9.
  • 9 Raffatellu M, Wilson RP, Winter SE, Bäumler AJ. Clinical pathogenesis of typhoid fever. J Infect Dev Ctries 2008;2:260-6.
  • 10 Wijburg OL, Simmons CP, van Rooijen N, Strugnell RA. Dual role for macrophages in vivo in pathogenesis and control of murine Salmonella enterica var. Typhimurium infections. Eur J Immunol 2000;30:944-53.
  • 11 Ohl ME, Miller SI. Salmonella: A model for bacterial pathogenesis. Annu Rev Med 2001;52:259-74.
  • 12 Pegues DA, Miller SI. Salmonellosis. In: Longo DL, Kasper DL, Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 2012. p. 1274-7.
  • 13 Agarwal R, Gupta D, Ray P, Aggarwal AN, Jindal SK. Epidemiology, risk factors and outcome of nosocomial infections in a respiratory Intensive Care Unit in North India. J Infect 2006;53:98-105.
  • 14 Keddy KH, Sooka A, Letsoalo ME, Hoyland G, Chaignat CL, Morrissey AB, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of typhoid fever rapid antibody tests for laboratory diagnosis at two sub-Saharan African sites. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:640-7.
  • 15 Khan M, Coovadia YM, Connoly C, Sturm AW. The early diagnosis of typhoid fever prior to the Widal test and bacteriological culture results. Acta Trop 1998;69:165-73.