An Empiric Analysis of Omaha System Targets

Summary

Interface terminologies used in electronic health records must be re-evaluated and revised to reflect current health care practice and knowledge. To enable future revisions of the Omaha System Intervention Scheme, investigators evaluated formal semantic structure of target terms and concept duplication of problem and target terms. Using linguistic principles and qualitative analysis, five themes were found. A multidimensional formal semantic structure for the intervention target term was proposed. Concept duplication was examined for 16 problem-target matches. Clinical data enabled assessment of the validity of a proposed formal semantic structure and concept duplication. Recommendations are suggested for future development of the Omaha System Intervention Scheme.

Keywords

Omaha System - clinical data management standards - clinical care - system improvement - system improvement - evaluation - methologies - data analysis

• References

• 1 Markle Connecting for Health Collaborative.. Achieving the health IT objectives of ARRA: A framework for “Meaningful Use” and “Certified or Qualified” EHR [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2010 Dec 30] Available from: http://markle.org/downloadable_assets/20090430_meaningful_use.pdf.
• 2 Martin KS, Monsen KA, Bowles KH. The Omaha System and meaningful use: Applications for practice, education, and research. Comput Inform Nurs 2011; 29: 52-58.
• 3 Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (05) 382-385.
• 4 Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nurs Outlook 2008; 56 (05) 258-266.
• 5 Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. A model for evaluating interface terminologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (01) 65-76.
• 6 American Nurses Association.. ANA recognized terminologies and data element sets. [Cited 2010 Dec 30] Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies.htm.
• 7 McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 4^th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007
• 8 International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) 2011.. Available from: http://www.icn.ch/pillarsprograms/international-classification-for-nursing-practicer/.
• 9 Saba V. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual: A Guide to Nursing Documentation. New York: Springer; 2006
• 10 Martin KS. The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management. Reprinted 2nd ed. Omaha, NE: Health Connections Press; 2005
• 11 Farri O, Monsen KA, Westra BL, Melton G. Analysis of free text with Omaha System Targets in Community-Based Care to Inform Practice and Terminology Development. Applied Clinical Informatics 2011; 2: 304-316.
• 12 Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. Interface terminologies: Facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (03) 277-288.
• 13 Monsen KA, Westra BL, Yu F, Ramadoss VK, Kerr MJ. Intervention data management for effectiveness research: Comparing inductive and deductive approaches. Res Nurs Health 2009; 32 (06) 647-656.
• 14 Monsen KA, Banerjee A, Das P. Discovering client and intervention patterns in home visiting data. West J Nurs Res 2010; 83: 1031-1054.
• 15 Monsen KA, Westra BL, Oancea SC, Yu F, Kerr MJ. Comparing approaches for linking home care interventions and hospitalization outcomes for frail and non-frail elderly clients. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34: 160-168.
• 16 Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992
• 17 Melton GB, Westra BL, Raman N, Monsen KA, Kerr MJ, Hart CH, Solomon DA, Timm JE. Informing standard development and understanding user needs with Omaha System signs and symptoms text entries in community-based care settings. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010: 512-516.
• 18 Powerwrite.. Understanding parts of speech and sentences. [Cited 2010 Dec 30] Available from: http://fac web.furman.edu/~moakes/Powerwrite/partspeech.htm.