Download PDF
Hamostaseologie 2014; 34(04): 291-300
DOI: 10.5482/HAMO-14-03-0017
Originalarbeit
Schattauer GmbH

Prophylaktische Faktorsubstitution bei schwerer Hämophilie A

Ökonomische Bewertung erwachsener PatientenProphylactic factor substitution in severe haemophilia AEconomic assessment in adult patients
K. Berger   *
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität München
,
D. Schopohl   *
1   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Universität München
,
D. Eheberg
2   IMS Health, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, München
,
J. Oldenburg
3   Institut für Experimentelle Hämatologie und Transfusionsmedizin (IHT), Universitäts-klinikum Bonn
,
A. Tiede
4   Abteilung für Hämatologie, Hämostaseologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
,
W. Schramm
5   Rudolf-Marx-Stiftung, Bluterbetreuung Bayern, München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 06 March 2014

accepted in revised form: 12 August 2014

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Prophylaxe kann bei Erwachsenen mit schwerer Hämophilie A klinisch notwendig sein. Ziel war es, die prophylaktische Faktor-VIII-Substitution bei erwachsenen Patienten mit Hämophilie in Deutschland ökonomisch zu bewerten. Patienten, Methoden: Für die Analysen wurde ein Entscheidungsmodell erstellt: Zeithorizont ein Jahr; Perspektive gesetzliche Krankenkassen; Referenzpatient (RP) und zwei Patientenprofile. Die Berech-nungen basieren auf Daten aus einer struktu-rierten Literatursuche, -analyse und einer Pharmakovigilanzstudie mit Patienten zu Therapiewechsel On-demand/Prophylaxe (OD/Proph). Ergebnisse: RP: 45 Jahre, 20 Blutungen p.a. OD, 16 vermiedene Blutungen mit 8,5 I.U./kg/d Proph, Zusatzkosten 141 113 Euro p.a.; Profil 1: 50 Jahre, 55 Blutungen p.a. OD, Faktorverbrauch pro Blutung 20 I.U./kg höher als bei R P, 39 vermiedene Blutungen mit 8,5 I.U./kg/d Proph, Zusatzkosten 19 134 Euro p.a.; Profil 2: 60 Jahre, 35 Blutungen p.a. OD, Faktorverbrauch pro Blutung 40–80 I.U./kg höher als bei R P, 34 vermiedene Blutungen mit 11 I.U./kg/d Proph, Einsparung 660 Euro p.a. Schlussfolgerung: In der indivi-duellen Situation kann eine prophylaktische Faktorsubstitution bei erwachsenen Patienten auch ökonomisch sinnvoll sein. Um künftig diesen Effekt umfassend zu bewerten, werden longitudinale Daten aus dem Versorgungsalltag inklusive klinischer Outcomes, Lebensqua-lität und Adhärenz benötigt.

Summary

Prophylaxis in adults can be necessary and reasonable for clinical reasons. The aim was to evaluate from an economic viewpoint prophylactic factor VIII substitution in adult patients with haemophilia in Germany. Patients, methods: A decision model (time frame: one year; perspective: statutory health insurance; reference patient (RP) and 2 patient profiles) was developed. Calculations are based on data from a structured literature search and a pharmacovigilance study: therapy switch ondemand/prophylaxis (OD/Proph). Results: RP: 45 years, 20 bleeds p.a. OD, 16 bleeds avoided with 8.5 I.U./kg/d Proph, additional cost Euro 141 113 p.a.; profile 1: 50 years, 55 bleeds p.a. OD, factor consumption per bleed 20 I.U./kg higher than R P, 39 bleeds avoided with 8.5 I.U./kg/d Proph, additional cost Euro 19 134 p.a.; profile 2: 60 years, 35 bleeds p.a. OD, factor consumption per bleed 40–80 I.U./ kg higher than R P, 34 bleeds avoided with 11 I.U./kg/d Proph, cost reduction Euro 660 p.a. Conclusions: Prophylactic factor VIII substitution in adult haemophilia patients is depending on the individual clinical situation not only clinically but also economically reasonable. To evaluate this effects in the future comprehensively, longitudinal real-life data from patient-centered care are needed including clinical outcomes, quality of life and adherence.

Schlüsselwörter

Hämophilie A - Erwachsene - Prophylaxe - Wirt-schaftlichkeit

Keywords

Haemophilia A - adults - prophylaxis - economics

* These authors contributed equally.


 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jonsson B. et al. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24: 244-258.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P. et al. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23: 36-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Berntorp E, Astermark J, Baghaei F. et al. Report no. 208E of the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU): Treatment of Hemophilia A and B and von Willebrand Disease. ISBN. 978-91-85413-44-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ehlers A, Rybak C, Willhöft C. Healthcare and reimbursement of medicines in Germany - current problems, challenges and reform of the healthcare sector. Life Sciences Handbook. 2011 www.eeplaw.de/fileadmin/files/pdf/aktMedVer11/veroeff18032011_2.pdf accessed 23112012.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Verfahrensordnung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses Stand: 21. Februar 2013 Bundesanzeiger AT. 15.05.2013 B2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bundesärztekammer. Querschnitts-Leitlinien (BÄK) zur Therapie mit Blutkomponenten und Plasmaderivaten. Deutscher Ärzteverlag. ISBN. 978-3-7691-1269-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD. et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 535-544.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Beck KH, Holzschuh J. Evidence of prophylaxis treatment in adult haemophiliacs. Need of this treatment strategy?. Hämostaseologie 2011; 31 (Suppl. 01) S34-S37.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Makris M. Prophylaxis in haemophilia should be life-long. Blood Transfus 2012; 10: 165-168.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pollmann H, Klamroth R, Vidovic N. et al. Prophylaxis and quality of life in patients with hemophilia A during routine treatment with ADVATE [antihemophilic factor (recombinant), plasma/albumin-free method] in Germany. Ann Hematol 2013; 92: 689-698.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brackmann HH, Eickhoff HJ, Oldenburg J, Hammerstein U. Long-term therapy and on-demand treatment of children and adolescents with severe haemophilia A: 12 years of experience. Haemostasis 1992; 22: 251-258.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Oldenburg J. Prophylaxis in bleeding disorders. Thromb Res 2011; 127 (Suppl. 01) S14-S17.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pollmann H, Externest D, Ganser A. et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of recombinant factor VIII (REFACTO) in patients with haemophilia A: interim data from a postmarketing surveillance study in Germany and Austria. Haemophilia 2007; 13: 131-143.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Valentino LA. Controversies regarding the prophylactic management of adults with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2009; 15 (Suppl. 02) 5-18.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bundesbasisfallwert (BBFW). 2011 www.gkv-spit zenverband.de/KH_KH_Verhandlungen_BBFW.gkvnet accessed 10012012.
    PubMed
  • 16 G-DRG-System. 2011 www.g-drg.de/cms/ G-DRG-System_2011/Fallpauschalen-Katalog/ Fallpauschalen-Katalog (accessed 10012012).
    PubMed
  • 17 Auerswald G, von Depka Prondzinski M, Ehlken B. et al. Treatment patterns and cost-of-illness of severe haemophilia in patients with inhibitors in Germany. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 499-508.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Collins P, Faradji A, Morfini M. et al. Efficacy and safety of secondary prophylactic vs. on-demand sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII treatment in adults with severe hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 08: 83-89.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP. et al. Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia. 2nd ed.. 2012. World Federation of Hemophilia. www1.wfh.org/publications/files/pdf1472.pdf (accessed 01072014).
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Siegmund B, Richter H, Pollmann H. Need for Prophylactic Treatment in Adult Haemophilia A Patients. Transfus Med Hemother 2009; 36: 283-288.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Study Evaluating Refacto For Pharmacovigilance; ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT00195442. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT00195442?term=NCT00195442&rank=1 (accessed 01072014).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tagliaferri A, Franchini M, Coppola A. et al. Effects of secondary prophylaxis started in adolescent and adult haemophiliacs. Haemophilia 2008; 14: 945-951.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Walsh CE, Valentino LA. Factor VIII prophylaxis for adult patients with severe haemophilia A: results of a US survey of attitudes and practices. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 1014-1021.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tagliaferri A, Rivolta G, Coppola A. et al. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy through economic report (P.O.T.T.E.R.) study (abstract PP-WE-567). J Thromb Haemost 2009; 07 (Suppl. 02) 819.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Siegmund B, Richter H, Pollmann H. Haemophilia A therapy of adults. Actual treatment situation in a haemophilia centre. Hämostaseologie 2010; 30 (Suppl. 01) S32-S34.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pavlova A, Oldenburg J. Defining severity of hemophilia: more than factor levels. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39: 702-170.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lalezari S, Coppola A, Lin J. et al. Patient characteristics that influence efficacy of prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS three times per week: a subgroup analysis of the LIPLONG study. Haemophilia 2014; 20: 354-631.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schramm W, Krebs H. Haemophilia patients in Germany 2008/2009. Morbidity and mortality. Hämostaseologie 2010; 30 (Suppl. 01) S9-S14.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Besmens I, Brackmann HH, Oldenburg J. Comprehensive Care Center Bonn from 1980 to 2009. Changes in the epidemiology and regional composition of the haemophilia population. Hämostaseologie 2011; 31 (Suppl. 01) S4-S10.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Miesbach W, Alesci S, Krekeler S, Seifried E. Comorbidities and bleeding pattern in elderly haemophilia A patients. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 894-899.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dolan G, Hermans C, Klamroth R. et al. Challenges and controversies in haemophilia care in adulthood. Haemophilia 2009; 15 (Suppl. 01) 20-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (Hrsg.) Welche Evidenz wird für die Erstellung von Leitlinien für seltene Erkrankungen derzeit herangezogen?. IQWIG-Berichte 2011 Nr. 83. www.iqwig.de/download/V10-01_Rapid-Report_Evidenz_fuer_Leitlinien_zu_seltenen_Erkrankungen.pdf (accessed 23112012).
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Berger K, Schopohl D, Schramm W. What is the evidence produced so far by the application of HTA to haemophilia care?. Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law 2011; 13: 213-220.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Manco-Johnson MJ, Kempton CL, Reding MT. et al. Randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of routine prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII in adults with severe hemophilia A (SPINART). J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1119-1127.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar