Silicone explant: the importance of breast magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative planning

▪ ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Recent concerns about the safety of silicone implants have led many women to seek the removal of their implants, even without apparent breast complications. On the other hand, many surgeons do not feel comfortable performing the explant for fear that the patient will not like the aesthetic result after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable resource for diagnostic evaluation of the breast and can be used in explant planning. The objective is to demonstrate how the systematic analysis of breast MRI images can assist in planning silicone explantation.

Method:

A detailed analysis of the axial and sagittal MRI sections was performed to assess the amount of tissue in each breast. These images were presented to patients during the preoperative consultation so that they could clearly understand how much the implant influences the size of their breasts. At the same time, post-operative photos of patients with similar characteristics were presented so that the patient could analyze, more objectively, whether or not she would be satisfied with the aesthetics of her breasts after explantation.

Results:

The patients demonstrated a high degree of understanding of the images presented and were satisfied with this detailed analysis of expected results.

Conclusion:

The comparison of breast MRI images and postoperative results images provides greater objectivity to the preoperative dialogue, favoring the understanding of the expected result and bringing greater clarity to the decision for explantation.

Keywords:

Breast implants - Breast diseases - Preoperative care - Magnetic resonance imaging - Silicone elastomers

Institution: Instituto de Cirurgia Plástica Santa Cruz, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 27. Juni 2023

Angenommen: 05. Dezember 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Mai 2025

• REFERÊNCIAS

• 1 Calobrace MB. Elective Implant Removal and Replacement in Asymptomatic Aesthetic Patients with Textured Devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (5S): 14S-23S
• 2 Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, McGuire PA, Adams Jr WP. Deva AK. Breast Implant Illness: A Way Forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (3S): 74S-81S
• 3 Tanna N, Calobrace MB, Clemens MW, Hammond DC, Nahabedian MY, Rohrich RJ. et al. Not All Breast Explants Are Equal: Contemporary Strategies in Breast Explantation Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (04) 808-818
• 4 Rohrich RJ, Bellamy JL, Alleyne B. Assessing Long-Term Outcomes in Breast Implant Illness: The Missing Link? A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (04) 638e-45e
• 5 Rohrich RJ, Kaplan J, Dayan E. Silicone Implant Illness: Science versus Myth?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (01) 98-109
• 6 Rossi AJRE, Kluthcovsky ACGC, Mansani FP. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography as the best examination to measure malignant breast tumors in surgical planning. Mastology 2018; 28 (03) 176-181
• 7 Schmitt W, Coelho JM, Lopes J, Marques JC. O Papel da Radiologia na Monitorização das Complicações Relacionadas com as Próteses Mamárias. Acta Radiol Port 2018; 30 (01) 23-34