Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.5935/2177-1235.2024RBCP0837-PT
Breast reconstruction: 10 years experience
Article in several languages: português | English
▪ ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Breast reconstruction after surgical treatment for breast cancer (one of the main cancers that affect women) has been progressively more recommended, given the benefits of psychological recovery and quality of life, whether using implants and/or autologous tissues. The present work aims to demonstrate the team’s experience, and discuss operative techniques and complications concerning data from the world literature, in addition to verifying the applicability of the technique in the team’s clinical practice.
Method:
Retrospective observational study developed at a university hospital in Juiz de Fora based on a review of medical records of patients who underwent mastectomy with breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2020.
Results:
Of the 860 breasts treated, 84% underwent immediate oncological surgery and 16% were late; the main access to the breast tissue was the Stewart incision, followed by extended inframammary, periareolar, and inverted T incisions; regarding reconstructive techniques, 35% of cases used a latissimus dorsi muscle flap, 25% used a prepectoral prosthesis, 20% used a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and 10% used a local muscle flap. The most common complications were surgical site dehiscence, followed by skin necrosis, seroma, surgical site infection, and hematoma, in addition to other less common complications such as chronic pain and prosthesis rupture after mammography.
Conclusion:
Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential for a woman’s physical and emotional recovery, with the techniques used in the last ten years being consistent, reliable, with low morbidity, and with excellent aesthetic results when correctly indicated.
Keywords:
Breast - Mammaplasty - Breast neoplasms - Surgical flaps - Muscles - Postoperative complications - Plastic surgery procedures.Institution: Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 03 July 2023
Accepted: 05 December 2023
Article published online:
20 May 2025
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
IZADORA LORENA FERREIRA REIS, ROMEU FERREIRA DARODA, CARLAILE SOARES FRANCO, GABRIEL FELIPE SILVA, LARISSA SILVA LEITÃO DARODA. Reconstrução mamária: Experiência de 10 anos. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (RBCP) – Brazilian Journal of Plastic Surgery 2024; 39: 217712352024rbcp0837pt.
DOI: 10.5935/2177-1235.2024RBCP0837-PT
-
REFERÊNCIAS
- 1 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2019
- 2 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). A situação do câncer de mama no Brasil: síntese de dados dos sistemas de informação. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2019
- 3 Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA. Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (02) 278-285
- 4 Citgez B, Yigit B, Bas S. Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2022; 14 (01) e21763
- 5 Mak JC, Kwong A. Complications in Post-mastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Ten-year Analysis of Outcomes. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20 (05) 402-407
- 6 Friedrich M, Krämer S, Friedrich D, Kraft C, Maass N, Rogmans C. Difficulties of Breast Reconstruction - Problems That No One Likes to Face. Anticancer Res 2021; 41 (11) 5365-5375
- 7 Siqueira HFF, Teixeira J, Lessa Filho R, Brito EAC, Lima M, Moura AR. et al. Aesthetic assessment of breast reconstruction in the eyes of plastic surgeons versus nonplastic physicians. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2022; 68 (01) 13-18
- 8 Choi M, Frey JD. Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (Suppl. 02) S13-21
- 9 Ho TB, Wood WC, Mspt PDS. Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Controversies and Disparities. Oncology (Williston Park) 2019; 33 (12) 688845
- 10 Gurrado A, Pasculli A, Toma A, Maruccia M, Elia R, Moschetta M. et al. Mastectomy with one-stage or two-stage reconstruction in breast cancer: analysis of early outcomes and patient’s satisfaction. Updates Surg 2023; 75 (01) 235-243
- 11 Toh U, Takenaka M, Iwakuma N, Akagi Y. Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique. Surg Today 2021; 51 (06) 862-871