Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.3.201
The Rat Model in Microsurgery Education: Classical Exercises and New Horizons
Microsurgery is a precise surgical skill that requires an extensive training period and the supervision of expert instructors. The classical training schemes in microsurgery have started with multiday experimental courses on the rat model. These courses have offered a low threat supervised high fidelity laboratory setting in which students can steadily and rapidly progress. This simulated environment allows students to make and recognise mistakes in microsurgery techniques and thus shifts any related risks of the early training period from the operating room to the lab. To achieve a high level of skill acquisition before beginning clinical practice, students are trained on a comprehensive set of exercises the rat model can uniquely provide, with progressive complexity as competency improves. This paper presents the utility of the classical rat model in three of the earliest microsurgery training centres and the new prospects that this versatile and expansive training model offers.
Publication History
Received: 10 February 2013
Accepted: 14 May 2013
Article published online:
02 May 2022
© 2014. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Austin GT, Hammond FW, Schaberg SJ. et al. A laboratory model for vascular microsurgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41: 450-455
- 2 Kaufman T, Hurwitz DJ, Ballantyne DL. The foliage leaf in microvascular surgery. Microsurgery 1984; 5: 57-58
- 3 Weber D, Moser N, Rosslein R. A synthetic model for microsurgical training: a surgical contribution to reduce the number of animal experiments. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7: 204-206
- 4 Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2001; 21: 389-393
- 5 Lee S. Historical events on development of experimental microsurgical organ transplantation. Yonsei Med J 2004; 45: 1115-1120
- 6 Green CJ. Microsurgery in the clinic and laboratory. Lab Anim 1987; 21: 1-10
- 7 Gilbert A, Legagneux J, Lapierre F. Apprentissage de la microchirurgie. In: Techniques chirurgicales: chirurgie plastique reconstructrice et esthetique (45-025) Paris: Encycl Med Chir; 1998: 24
- 8 Cabrol C, Gilbert A. Training of microsurgery in the laboratory of the Hopitaux de Paris. Chirurgie 1991; 117: 145-148
- 9 Green C, Simpkin S. Clinical Research Centre (Harrow, London, England). Basic microsurgical techniques: a laboratory manual. Harrow, Middlesex, UK: Surgical Research Group, MRC Clinical Research Centre; 1986
- 10 Acland RD. Practice manual for microvascular surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1980
- 11 Akelina Y, Danilo P. Endogenous adipose tissue as a hemostatic: use in microsurgery. Microsurgery 2008; 28: 192-196
- 12 Korber KE, Kraemer BA. Heterotopic renal transplantation in the rat: an advanced microsurgical training exercise. Microsurgery 1988; 9: 286-291
- 13 Man D, Acland RD. Continuous-suture technique in microvascular end-to-end anastomosis. J Microsurg 1981; 2: 238-243
- 14 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K. et al. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16: 437-442
- 15 Bao JY. Rat tail: a useful model for microvascular training. Microsurgery 1995; 16: 122-125
- 16 Crosby NL, Clapson JB, Buncke HJ. et al. Advanced non-animal microsurgical exercises. Microsurgery 1995; 16: 655-658
- 17 Zhang F, Chin BT, Ho PR. et al. Rat tail replantation as a training model for microvascular procedures of digit replantation. Microsurgery 1998; 18: 364-367
- 18 Akan M, Cakir B, Akoz T. "Open y" technique in vessel diameter discrepancy. Microsurgery 2006; 26: 506-514
- 19 Blidisel A, Jiga L, Nistor A. et al. Video-assisted versus conventional microsurgical training: a comparative study in the rat model. Microsurgery 2007; 27: 446-450
- 20 Galvao FH, Bacchella T, Cerqueira Machado M. Teaching intestinal transplantation in the rat for medical student. Microsurgery 2007; 27: 277-281
- 21 Miyamoto S, Okazaki M, Ohura N. et al. Comparative study of different combinations of microvascular anastomoses in a rat model: end-to-end, end-to-side, and flow-through anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 449-455
- 22 Mofikoya BO, Ugburo AO, Bankole OB. Microvascular Anastomosis of Vessels Less Than 0.5 mm in Diameter: A Supermicrosurgery Training Model in Lagos, Nigeria. J Hand Microsurg 2011; 3: 15-17
- 23 Sakrak T, Kose AA, Karabagli Y. et al. Rat tail revascularization model for advanced microsurgery training and research. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27: 391-396
- 24 Spetzger U, von Schilling A, Brombach T. et al. Training models for vascular microneurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011; 112: 115-119
- 25 Yazici I, Cavusoglu T, Karakaya EI. et al. Microsurgical training model for lymphaticovenous anastomosis in rat. Microsurgery 2012; 32: 420-422