Download PDF
CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42(02): 173-178
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.2.173
Original Article

Early Intervention for Low-Temperature Burns: Comparison between Early and Late Hospital Visit Patients

Matthew Seung Suk Choi
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
,
Ho Joon Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
,
Jang Hyun Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
› Author AffiliationsThis study was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2014).
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Background Various focal heating devices are popular in Korea under the cultural influence of the traditional ondol under-floor method of home heating. These devices can cause severe burn-like injuries resulting from device malfunction or extended with low heat contact. In addition to injuries under these high heat contact, burns can be occurred by low heat exposure with prolonged periods despite the devices are properly functioning. In order to develop strategies to reduce the duration of periods of illness due to low-temperature burns, we analyzed and compared treatment methods and therapeutic periods for this type of injury.

Methods This retrospective study included 43 patients burned under low heat conditions. Patients were divided into an operative group and a conservative group. The patients in the operative group underwent at least one surgical excision, and were further subdivided into early and late visit groups. The conservative group was treated only with dressings. We compared the treatment periods between the operative group and the conservative group, and also compared the preparation periods and treatment periods between the two operative groups.

Results The average treatment period was significantly shorter in the operative group (P=0.02). In the early visit operative group, both wound preparation and treatment were briefer than in the late visit group.

Conclusions We recommend that early proper burn care and early surgical intervention, including appropriate excision, are feasible ways to reduce the treatment period of low-temperature burn patients.

Keywords

Burns - Clinic visit - Early intervention

This article was presented at the 72th Congress of Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons on November 7-9, 2014 in Seoul, Korea.




Publication History

Received: 27 October 2014

Accepted: 11 December 2014

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2015. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Song DS, Kim HC, Woo GW. A retrospective epidemiologic analysis of burn patients at Hanil hospital. J Korean Burn Soc 2009; 12: 21-37
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Gray DT, Pine RW, Harnar TJ. et al. Early surgical excision versus conventional therapy in patients with 20 to 40 percent burns. A comparative study. Am J Surg 1982; 144: 76-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Herndon DN, Barrow RE, Rutan RL. et al. A comparison of conservative versus early excision. Therapies in severely burned patients. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 547-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mosier MJ, Gibran NS. Surgical excision of the burn wound. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36: 617-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vinita P, Khare NA, Chandramouli M. et al. Comparative analysis of early excision and grafting vs delayed grafting in burn patients in a developing country. J Burn Care Res. 13.10.2014. [Epub] https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827e4ed6
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Papp A, Kiraly K, Harma M. et al. The progression of burn depth in experimental burns: a histological and methodological study. Burns 2004; 30: 684-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Agency for technology and standards. Recommendation recall of electrical heating product: electric pad and mat. The ministry of knowledge economy [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy Republic of Korea; 2011. cited 2012 Apr 3 Available from: https://www.mke.go.kr/news/coverage/bodoView.jsp?pCtx=1&seq=73596
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Mun JH, Jeon JH, Jung YJ. et al. The factors associated with contact burns from therapeutic modalities. Ann Rehabil Med 2012; 36: 688-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moritz AR, Henriques FC. Studies of thermal injury: II. The relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. Am J Pathol 1947; 23: 695-720
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Henriques FC, Moritz AR. Studies of thermal injury: I. The conduction of heat to and through skin and the temperatures attained therein. A theoretical and an experimental investigation. Am J Pathol 1947; 23: 530-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shupp JW, Nasabzadeh TJ, Rosenthal DS. et al. A review of the local pathophysiologic bases of burn wound progression. J Burn Care Res 2010; 31: 849-873
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lee KM, Kim WH, Lee JH. et al. Risk factors of treatment failure in diabetes foot ulcer patients. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40: 123-128
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Choi MS, Jeon SB, Lee JH. Predictive factors for successful limb salvage surgery in diabetic foot patients. BMC surg 2014; 14: 113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar