Simple Correction of Alar Retraction by Conchal Cartilage Extension Grafts

Background Alar retraction is a challenging condition in rhinoplasty marked by exaggerated nostril exposure and awkwardness. Although various methods for correcting alar retraction have been introduced, none is without drawbacks. Herein, we report a simple procedure that is both effective and safe for correcting alar retraction using only conchal cartilage grafting.

Methods Between August 2007 and August 2009, 18 patients underwent conchal cartilage extension grafting to correct alar retraction. Conchal cartilage extension grafts were fixed to the caudal margins of the lateral crura and covered with vestibular skin advancement flaps. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were reviewed and analyzed. Patient satisfaction was surveyed and categorized into 4 groups (very satisfied, satisfied, moderate, or unsatisfied).

Results According to the survey, 8 patients were very satisfied, 9 were satisfied, and 1 considered the outcome moderate, resulting in satisfaction for most patients. The average distance from the alar rim to the long axis of the nostril was reduced by 1.4 mm (3.6 to 2.2 mm). There were no complications, except in 2 cases with palpable cartilage step-off that resolved without any aesthetic problems.

Conclusions Conchal cartilage alar extension graft is a simple, effective method of correcting alar retraction that can be combined with aesthetic rhinoplasty conveniently, utilizing conchal cartilage, which is the most similar cartilage to alar cartilage, and requiring a lesser volume of cartilage harvest compared to previously devised methods. However, the current procedure lacks efficacy for severe alar retraction and a longer follow-up period may be required to substantiate the enduring efficacy of the current procedure.

Keywords

Ear cartilage - Nose - Rhinoplasty - Transplants

Publication History

Received: 09 May 2016

Accepted: 20 September 2016

Article published online:
20 April 2022

• References

• 1 Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Friedman RM. Classification and correction of alar-columellar discrepancies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 643-648
• 2 Constantian MB. Indications and use of composite grafts in 100 consecutive secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients: introduction of the axial orientation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 1116-1133
• 3 Kim JH, Park SW, Oh WS. et al. New classification for correction of alar retraction using the alar spreader graft. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36: 832-841
• 4 Sheen JH, Sheen AP. Aesthetic rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Quality Meical Publishing; 1998
• 5 Rohrich RJ, Raniere Jr J, Ha RY. The alar contour graft: correction and prevention of alar rim deformities in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2495-2505
• 6 Kim HS, Roh SG. The alar extension graft for retracted ala. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 36: 66-74
• 7 Ellenbogen R. Alar rim lowering. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79: 50-57
• 8 Constantian MB. The incompetent external nasal valve: pathophysiology and treatment in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 919-931
• 9 Gruber RP, Kryger G, Chang D. The intercartilaginous graft for actual and potential alar retraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 288e-296e
• 10 Gunter JP, Friedman RM. Lateral crural strut graft: technique and clinical applications in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 943-952
• 11 Hirohi T, Yoshimura K. Surgical correction of retracted nostril rim with auricular composite grafts and anchoring suspention. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003; 27: 418-422
• 12 Alexander AJ, Shah AR, Constantinides MS. Alar retraction: etiology, treatment, and prevention. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15: 268-274