One injection for a great projection: a quick and simple procedure for nipple reconstruction

Women attach great importance to the presence of a three-dimensional nipple upon completion of the breast reconstruction process. To meet patients’ expectations, nipple-areolar complex reconstruction should achieve symmetry in position, size, shape, texture, and color, as well as minimizing donor-site morbidity. However, it is well known that regardless of the reconstructive technique, loss of nipple projection can be reasonably expected. We developed and evaluated a quick, simple, and innovative technique using injectable Integra Flowable Wound Matrix to increase nipple projection after reconstruction. Twenty breast cancer patients who underwent nipple reconstruction resulting in unsatisfactory projection were enrolled in our retrospective study. Nipple projection was measured at the time of surgery and after 6 and 12 months. A visual analogue scale was used to assess patients’ satisfaction. Our technique yielded reliable results in terms of the long-lasting maintenance of nipple projection. This method is high-priced, but cost-effective, since one kit may suffice for three patients. Furthermore, our patients were very appreciative of this technique as a single-step, minimally invasive, painless procedure with no reported necessity of re-intervention.

Keywords

Nipple - Breast - Breast neoplasm - Dermal filler - Acellular dermis

Publication History

Received: 22 August 2019

Accepted: 17 April 2020

Article published online:
07 March 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB. et al. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80: 699-704
• 2 Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C. et al. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satis-faction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 389-93
• 3 Gougoutas AJ, Said HK, Um G. et al. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141: 404e-416e
• 4 Fansa H, Heitmann C. Reconstruction of the nipple areola complex (NAC). In: Fansa H, Heitmann C. Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. Cham: Springer; 2019: 175-80
• 5 Nahabedian MY. Nipple reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2007; 34: 131-7
• 6 Jalini L, Lund J, Hornsby J. et al. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: long term outcome and patient satisfaction in a District General Hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42: S49-50
• 7 Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A. et al. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a compari-son of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 780-6
• 8 Winocour S, Saksena A, Oh C. et al. A systematic review of comparison of autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic augmentation grafts in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 14e-23e
• 9 Bernard RW, Beran SJ. Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 964-8
• 10 Park GY, Yoon ES, Cho HE. et al. Acellular dermal matrix as a core strut for projection in nipple reconstruction: approaches for three different methods of breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43: 424-9
• 11 Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D. Filler injection enhances the projection of the reconstructed nipple: an original easy technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29: 287-94
• 12 Sisti A, Grimaldi L, Tassinari J. et al. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: a literature review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42: 441-65
• 13 Campitiello F, Mancone M, Della Corte A. et al. Acellular flowable matrix in the treatment of tun-neled or cavity ulcers in diabetic feet: a preliminary report. Adv Skin Wound Care 2018; 31: 270-5
• 14 Truong AT, Kowal-Vern A, Latenser BA. et al. Comparison of dermal substitutes in wound heal-ing utilizing a nude mouse model. J Burns Wounds 2005; 4: e4
• 15 Serre A, Guillier D, Moris V. et al. Nipple projection augmentation in breast reconstruction by arti-ficial derm injection. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2017; 62: 625-9