Homeopathy 2017; 106(01): 11-17
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2016.12.003
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2016

The characteristics, experiences and perceptions of homeopaths in New Zealand: results from a national survey of practitioners

Phillip Cottingham
1   Wellpark College of Natural Therapies, New Zealand
,
Jon Adams
2   Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Australia
,
Ram Vempati
1   Wellpark College of Natural Therapies, New Zealand
,
Jill Dunn
1   Wellpark College of Natural Therapies, New Zealand
,
David Sibbritt
2   Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 06 June 2016
revised 06 December 2016

accepted 12 December 2016

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Background: The popularity of homeopathy is seemingly at odds with the scientific controversy over its effectiveness. Several studies have reported on effectiveness of clinical homeopathy, but few studies have been conducted on practices and perceptions of homeopaths, and none in New Zealand (NZ). To address this gap, this paper reports findings from the first national survey examining the characteristics, perceptions and experiences of NZ-based homeopaths regarding a wide range of issues relating to their role and practice. There were 176 homeopaths in NZ at the time of this survey, who were members of a voluntary register (The New Zealand Council of Homeopaths), homeopaths are not statutorily registered in NZ.

Methods: A 65 question, online survey was sent to homeopathic practitioners via their professional associations. A total of 176 homeopaths were invited to participate. Of these 176, 57 (32%) responded.

Results: The majority of homeopaths were female (93%). Twelve percent were under 45 years and 20% over 55 years. Most (85%) had qualification in homeopathy of diploma or certificate level and most (66%) were engaged in part-time practice. Mean year of experience was 12.6 and mean caseload per month was 25. 90% considered research useful to validate practice, while 88% considered that it impacted on practice, although only 48% had skills to interpret research papers. There was an association between skills to interpret research and its impact on practice (p = 0.038). The majority (87%) were in favour of registration, with a statistically significant association between attitudes to registration and age (p = 0.027), the older homeopaths being more in favour. Most (68%) were in favour of integration with conventional practitioners and many referred to conventional practitioners (mean referrals per annum to GPs = 57 and midwives = 30). Homeopaths assessed their contribution to New Zealand Ministry of Health objectives as significant, with 77% perceiving that they improved nutrition, 75% increasing physical activity and 63% reducing smoking.

Conclusion: These findings enable greater understanding of the way in which homeopaths practice in New Zealand and how they perceive their role in health care. The findings potentially assist communication between homeopaths and other health professionals. There is a need to further investigate homeopaths' practices and perceptions in NZ.

 
  • References

  • 1 Holt S., Gilbey A., Colquhoun D., Baum M., Ernst E. Call for doctors not to practice homeopathy or refer to homeopaths. N Z Med J 2011; 124: 1331.
  • 2 Holt S., Gilbey A. Beliefs about homeopathy among patients presenting at GP surgeries. N Z Med J 2009; 122 1295 94-95.
  • 3 Evans A., Duncan B., McHugh P., Shaw J., Wilson C. Inpatients' use, understanding, and attitudes towards traditional, complementary and alternative therapies at a provincial New Zealand hospital. N Z Med J 2008; 121: 1278.
  • 4 Whitmarsh T. Phenomenology and homeopathy. Homeopathy 2013; 102 (03) July 225-229. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475491613000374.
  • 5 2006 Census Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand; 2007 [5th January 2014]. Available from: http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2006CensusHomePage.aspx.
  • 6 2013 Census Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand; 2015 [11th October 2015]. Available from: http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census.aspx.
  • 7 A portrait of health: key results of the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2008.
  • 8 Chrystal K., Allan S., Forgeson G., Isaacs R. The use of complementary/alternative medicine by cancer patients in a New Zealand regional cancer treatment centre. N Z Med J 2003; 116: 1168.
  • 9 Dixon A. Regulating complementary medical practitioners: an international review. London, United Kingdom: King's Fund; 2008.
  • 10 Leach M.J. Profile of the complementary and alternative medicine workforce across Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Complement Ther Med 2013; 21 (04) August 364-378.
  • 11 Xue C.C., Zhang A.L., Lin V., Da Costa C., Story D.F. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: a national population-based survey. J Altern Complement Med 2007; 13 (06) 643-650.
  • 12 Cooper K.L., Harris P.E., Relton C., Thomas K.J. Prevalence of visits to five types of complementary and alternative medicine practitioners by the general population: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2013; 19 (04) November 214-220.
  • 13 Allied Health Professions Act 1982. 1982
  • 14 NA. Guide to registration. Ontario, Canada: College of Homeopaths of Ontario; 2016 [16th June 2016]. Available from: http://www.collegeofhomeopaths.on.ca/docs/Guide%20to%20Reg,%20v7%20-%20April%202016.pdf.
  • 15 Boon H., Cherkin D., Erro J. et al. Practice patterns of naturopathic physicians: results from a random survey of licensed practitioners in two US States. BMC Complement Altern Med 2004; 4 (01) 14 10.1186/1472-6882-4-14.
  • 16 Casey M., Adams J., Sibbritt D. An examination of the clinical practices and perceptions of professional herbalists providing patient care concurrently with conventional medical practice in Australia. Complement Ther Med 2008; 16 (04) 228-232.
  • 17 Braun L.A., Spitzer O., Tiralongo E. et al. Naturopaths and Western herbalists' attitudes to evidence, regulation, information sources and knowledge about popular complementary medicines. Complement Ther Med 2013; 21 (01) 58-64.
  • 18 King A. The New Zealand health strategy. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2000.
  • 19 Welcome to New Zealand's leading Homeopathy College Auckland, New Zealand: College of Natural Health and Homeopathy; 2016 [2nd February 2016]. Available from: https://www.cnhh.ac.nz/.
  • 20 Cottingham P., Adams J., Vempati R., Dunn J., Sibbritt D. The characteristics, experiences and perceptions of naturopathic and herbal medicine practitioners: results from a national survey in New Zealand. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015; 15 (01) 114.
  • 21 Ruggie M., Cohen M.H. Integrative medicine centers: moving health care in a new direction. Semin Integr Med 2005; 3 (01) March 9-16.
  • 22 Harding D.M. New Zealand and Canadian midwives' use of complementary and alternative medicine. N Z Coll Midwives J 2009; 40: 7-12. PubMed PMID: 38334716.
  • 23 Gaffney L., Smith C.A. Use of complementary therapies in pregnancy: the perceptions of obstetricians and midwives in South Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44 (01) 24-29.
  • 24 Münstedt K., Brenken A., Kalder M. Clinical indications and perceived effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine in departments of obstetrics in Germany: a questionnaire study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 146 (01) Sepetember 50-54.
  • 25 Shuval J.T., Mizrachi N., Smetannikov E. Entering the well-guarded fortress: alternative practitioners in hospital settings. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55 (10) 1745-1755.
  • 26 Baxter J., Perrin C. Homeopathy as a choice: the new holistic antenatal clinic. Br J Midwifery 2006; 14 (12) 718-721.
  • 27 Saha S., Koley M., Arya J.S. et al. Patient preference for integrating homeopathy (PPIH) and attitude and satisfaction following integration within mainstream healthcare settings in West Bengal, India: the part 2 (PPIH-2) study. Focus Altern Complement Ther 2015; 20 (02) 81-88.
  • 28 Jong M.C., Margreet Hofstede A., Schats W., Meijer J.E.M., Koolen R., von Rosenstiel I.A. Attitudes towards integrative medicine among healthcare professionals in the Netherlands. Eur J Integr Med 2011; 3 (03) September e209-e217.
  • 29 Rossi E., Vita A., Baccetti S., Di Stefano M., Voller F., Zanobini A. Homeopathy and complementary medicine for cancer patients: results of a survey on integrative oncology centres in Europe. Homeopathy 2016; 105 (01) Febraury 21.
  • 30 Schmidt J.M. Evidence and excellence of homeopathy – revised and revisited. 2013.
  • 31 Orrock P. From complementary to allied. J Complement Med 2008; 7 (04) 6.
  • 32 The NZCH Membership Entry Pathwa: New Zealand Council of Homeopaths; 2014 [8th March 2015]. Available from: http://www.homeopathy.co.nz/assets/pdf/membership/nzch-membership-entry-pathway-sept-20-2011.pdf.
  • 33 Kelner M., Wellman B., Welsh S., Boon H. How far can complementary and alternative medicine go? The case of chiropractic and homeopathy. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63 (10) 2617-2627.
  • 34 Kelner M., Wellman B., Boon H., Welsh S. Responses of established healthcare to the professionalization of complementary and alternative medicine in Ontario. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59 (05) 915-930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.017.
  • 35 Parker A. Ontario homeopathic survey: are homeopaths prepared to be regulated?. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto; 2013.
  • 36 Stoneman P., Sturgis P., Allum N., Sibley E. Incommensurable worldviews? Is public use of complementary and alternative medicines incompatible with support for science and conventional medicine?. PLoS One 2013; 8 (01) 1-6. PubMed PMID: 85382550.
  • 37 Freckelton I. Death by homeopathy: issues for civil, criminal and coronial law and for health service policy. J Law Med 2012; 19 (03) 454-478.
  • 38 Rossi E., Picchi M., Panozzo M., Di Stefano M., Baccetti S. Integration of homeopathy and complementary medicine in the public health system in Italy: national regulation and regional experiences. J Med Person 2015; 13 (01) 45-54.
  • 39 Goldacre B. Benefits and risks of homoeopathy. Lancet 2007; 370 9600 1672-1673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61706-1.
  • 40 NHMRC information paper: evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions. Engineering and Medicine. Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration: Life and Physical Sciences Research for a New Era. Canberra, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council.;
  • 41 Breach J., Daffy P., Baden D., Cumming F., Greenwood S., Kotsirilos V. Regulation of complementary medicines. J Complement Med 2003; 2 (04) 44-46. 9–50, 2–5.
  • 42 Mundle M., Saha S., Koley M. et al. A survey exploring research perception of homeopathic undergraduate students in West Bengal, India. Int J High Dilution Res 2014; 13 (46) 28-44.
  • 43 Holmes T. Tensions in naturopathic education. J Altern Complement Med 2013; 19 (12) December 1 978-979.
  • 44 Kalder M., Knoblauch K., Hrgovic I., Münstedt K. Use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy and delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283 (03) March 1 475-482. English.
  • 45 Cant S.L., Sharma U. Professionalization of complementary medicine in the United Kingdom. Complement Ther Med 1996; 4 (03) July 157-162.
  • 46 Levy D., Ajjawi R., Roberts C. How do homeopaths reason and make decisions? Integrating theory, practice, and education. J Altern Complement Med 2010; 16 (12) 1321-1327.
  • 47 Thompson E.A., Mathie R.T., Baitson E.S. et al. Towards standard setting for patient-reported outcomes in the NHS homeopathic hospitals. Homeopathy 2008; 97 (03) July 114-121.
  • 48 Feingold E. Treating obesity with homeopathy. Am J Homeopath Med Summer 2006; 99 (02) 138-143. PubMed PMID: 21673652.
  • 49 Pittler M.H., Ernst E. Complementary therapies for reducing body weight: a systematic review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2005; 29 (09) 1030-1038. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803008.
  • 50 Evans S. The story of naturopathic education in Australia. Complement Ther Med 2000; 8 (04) December 234-240.
  • 51 Smith C., Martin K., Hotham E., Semple S., Bloustien G., Rao D. Naturopaths practice behaviour: provision and access to information on complementary and alternative medicines. BMC Complement Altern Med 2005; 5 (01) 15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-5-15.