Pharmacopsychiatry 2019; 52(03): 156-159
DOI: 10.1055/a-0586-8983
Letter to the Editor
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clozapine-Induced DRESS Syndrome: A Case Series From the AMSP Multicenter Drug Safety Surveillance Project

Bruna Sanader
1   Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Renate Grohmann
1   Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Philipp Grötsch
2   Department of Psychiatry, University Clinic Basel, Basel, Switzerland
,
Thomas Schumann
3   Psychiater Luzern Dr. Sabine Abele AG, Luzern/Lucerne, Switzerland
,
Sermin Toto
4   Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover, Germany
,
Piyumi Fernando
1   Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Susanne Stübner
5   Deparment of Psychiatry, Kbo-IAK, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University, Haar/Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Correspondence

Bruna Sanader
Department of Psychiatry
Ludwig Maximilian University
Nussbaumstraße 7
80336 Munich
Germany   

Publication History

received 28 November 2017
revised 01 February 2018

accepted 28 February 2018

Publication Date:
19 March 2018 (online)

 

Abstract

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is an infrequent, but severe, adverse drug-induced reaction which occurs due to massive T-cell stimulation resulting in cytotoxicity and eosinophil activation and recruitment. The incidence is 0.4 cases per 100, 0000 in the general population; the mortality rate is up to 10%. Therefore, we believe that recognizing this syndrome is of particular importance. The problem we notice is that DRESS is often seen and described in patients receiving rheumatologic or anticonvulsant drugs, but very rarely in psychiatric hospitals, where Clozapine is frequently used, and that is the importance of this paper. DRESS Syndrome must be recognized promptly, and causative drugs withdrawn. Indeed, it has been reported that the earlier the drug withdrawal, the better the prognosis. In this paper, we present three cases of Clozapine-induced DRESS. All cases were recorded in the Multicenter Drug Safety Surveillance Project (AMSP).


#

Introduction

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is an infrequent but severe adverse drug-induced reaction, which occurs due to massive T-cell stimulation and results in cytotoxicity and eosinophil activation and recruitment [1]. It is associated not only with immunological factors but also with genetic predisposition. Individual susceptibility, type of drug used, titration rate, and concomitant medication play a part in the development of the reaction. The incidence is 0.4 cases per 100,000 in the general population; the mortality rate is up to 10% [2]. Therefore, we believe that recognizing this syndrome is of particular importance. Mortality cases were mainly caused by multiple organ failure and sepsis. Therapeutic management mostly includes removal of a drug, symptomatic management, life support, and use of corticosteroids [3]. In a systematic review, 44 drugs were found to be associated with 172 cases of DRESS syndrome reported between January 1997 and May 2009. The drugs reported to have caused a DRESS were inter alia aromatic and non-aromatic antipiletic drugs (e. g., phenytoine, carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenobarbital) as well as allopurinol and sulfonamides. Anticonvulsants accounted for one-third of the drugs causing DRESS. In contrast, the vast majority of the various other drugs were only associated with 1 case of DRESS [2]. The diagnosis of DRESS is very challenging because the clinical features, types of skin reactions, and organs involved may notably differ between the individuals concerned. A delayed onset of symptoms 2–6 weeks after beginning of drug administration is one of the features of DRESS [2]. A score system called RegiSCAR has been developed by an international study group investigating severe cutaneous reactions in order to define the syndrome more accurately (SCAR) [4]. For the diagnosis of DRESS, 3 of the 6 main RegiSCAR criteria have to be met: acute rash, fever above 38°C, lymphadenopathy at minimum 2 locations, involvement of at least 1 internal organ, and abnormalities in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts. Additional criteria include hospitalization due to the reaction. A Japanese consensus group has developed a second set of criteria for DRESS. The diagnosis requires meeting 7 of the 9 criteria in this system or all of the first 5: a maculopapular rash development>3 weeks after drug initiation, clinical symptoms continuing>2 weeks after stopping therapy, fever>38°C, liver abnormalities (ALT>100 IU/L) or other organ involvement, leukocytosis, atypical lymphocytes, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, or HHV-6 reactivation [5].

This study focuses on cases in which DRESS was observed as adverse drug reaction of clozapine. So far, to our knowledge only 1 DRESS case report with involvement of clozapine was published. Ben-Ari et al. [6] described a case of a 27-year-old male with paranoid schizophrenia who was hospitalized with all 3 diagnostic criteria of DRESS syndrome as well as unusual fever pattern of high temperatures in the morning hours and lower temperatures toward evening under clozapine therapy ([Table 1]).

Table 1 RegiSCAR criteria and criteria of the Japanese consensus group represented through our cases.

RegiSCAR criteria

Criteria of the Japanese consensus group

Case 1

Case 2

Case 3

Fever>38°C

Fever>38°C

Positive

Unknown

Negative

Enlarged lymph nodes

Lymphadenopathy

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Eosinophilia

Eosinophilia

Positive

Positive

Negative

Atypical lymphocytes

Atypical lymphocytes

Unknown

Negative

Negative

Skin rash

Maculopapular rash development

Positive

Positive

Positive

Internal organ involvement

Liver abnormalities

Positive

Positive

Positive

Leukocytosis

Positive

Negative

Positive

Clinical symptoms continuing>2 weeks after stopping therapy

Positive

Positive

Positive

HHV-6 reactivation

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown


#

Case reports

We present 3 cases of clozapine-induced DRESS. All cases were recorded in the pharmacovigilance project Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie (AMSP).

Case 1

A 73-year-old male patient was admitted to the Department of Psychiatry due to an acute exacerbation of a chronic paranoid schizophrenia from which he had suffered since 1970. He was treated with quetiapine up to 600 mg per day; clozapine up to 400 mg per day was added 19 days later. (The reason for this rather unusual combination was ex post not to elucidate.) Other medications administered were finasteride, tamsulosine, acetylsalicylic acid, and zopiclone. These drugs had been given for a longer time prior to admission and were continued unchanged during hospitalization. On the 20th day of clozapine therapy, standard blood tests showed massive C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation of 24.7 mg/dL (reference range: 0–1 mg/dL). Over the next 13 days, eosinophils increased to a maximum of 1.917/nL (reference range: 0.05–0.250/nL). Moreover, the patient developed clinically severe sickness with body temperature of maximum 39°C and somnolence. There was no infection found. Clozapine levels were in the toxic range (1683 ng/mL, dose 400 mg), and CRP was still increased (14.2 mg/dL). All drugs were discontinued, and due to the severity of the patient’s health state, he was transferred to the hospital for internal medicine and treated with prednisolone. Eight days later a skin exanthema became apparent while he was already on prednisolone. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation found no infectious or autoimmunological cause. In the dismissal report, the cause of elevated liver enzymes, intermittent fever, and eosinophilia was stated as most likely a DRESS triggered by clozapine, despite initial absence of skin changes. Echocardiography showed low pericardial effusion, indicating additional mild cardiac involvement. With prednisolone therapy, a full recovery from DRESS was achieved. No immediate antipsychotic treatment was necessary afterward. Four months later, a re-exposure was tried with up to 25 mg clozapine per day, under which the patient developed an increase in CRP with discrete eosinophilia. After discontinuation of clozapine, within 2 days a clear laboratory-chemical improvement was noticed. As this represents a positive re-challenge reaction, this case was rated as definite clozapine-induced DRESS with eosinophilia, fever, rash, and increased transaminases fulfilling all 4 RegiSCAR criteria.


#

Case 2

A 69-year-old female patient was admitted to the Department of Psychiatry due to acute exacerbation of a paranoid schizophrenia, from which she had suffered since 1970. She was a nonsmoker. At the time of admission, laboratory routine parameters were without pathological findings. The patient was treated with up to 200 mg clozapine per day in monotherapy. On day 22 of clozapine treatment, she displayed generalized edema, most pronounced in the facial area (excluding the mouth) and on all extremities, partly with slight livid discoloration and beginning scaly; she complained of a subjective “flu feeling.” Eosinophilia (2.59 ng/mL), elevated liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase: 129 U/L, reference level: <35 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase: 46 U/L, reference level: <35 U/L; gamma glutamyltransferase: 144 U/L, reference level: <40 U/L; alkaline phosphatase: 292 U/L, reference range: 42–141 U/L), and a mild increase in CRP (7 mg/L, reference range: 0–1 mg/L) were detected on the same day. The patient was transferred to a hospital for internal medicine for observation. There, she was diagnosed with DRESS under clozapine, and the drug was discontinued on day 28. Levocetirizine was given for some days. Clinical and laboratory symptoms normalized 18 days after onset of DRESS. Unfortunately, there were no serum levels of medication documented. The patient was treated with aripiprazole later on. This case was rated as a probable case of DRESS due to clozapine. With dermatologic symptoms, eosinophilia, and increased liver enzymes as organ involvement, 3 of the 4 RegiSCAR criteria were met.


#

Case 3

A 57-year-old female patient with schizoaffective disorder was admitted for the 12th time to the Department of Psychiatry with symptoms of depression, such as feelings of emptiness and worthlessness, acoustic hallucinations, and paranoid delusions. Furthermore, the patient was addicted to low-dose benzodiazepines. After 2 weeks, she was treated with sertraline up to 150 mg/day. Clozapine was added 18 days later and titrated up to 200 mg/day. The patient had formerly been treated with clozapine and with several different antipsychotic drugs. Lorazepam was successfully discontinued within 4 weeks. Besides, she had been taking metformine 100 mg, metoprolol 50 mg, atorvastatine 10 mg, amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide 5/50 mg, lithium carbonate 450 mg, pantoprazole 20 mg, and L-thyroxin 88 µg for a long time prior to admission, and these drugs were continued in unchanged dosage. Routine blood tests, in particular liver enzymes, were in the normal range on admission day and remained so for the first 8 weeks. However, on day 36 of the clozapine treatment, liver enzymes started to increase and were massively elevated by day 49 (alanine aminotransferase: 1511 U/L, reference level: <35 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase: 932 U/L, reference level <35 U/L; gamma glutamyltransferase: 292 U/L, reference level <40 U/L). On day 5 of clozapine therapy, the blood level of clozapine was already rather high in relation to the given dosage: 728 ng/mL. For reasons unknown ex post, in this regard no action was taken. On day 49, the clozapine blood level was in the toxic range: 1551 ng/mL (reference level: 350–600 ng/mL). Furthermore, the patient had elevated CRP: 17.4 mg/dL (reference level: <0.5 mg/dL) without any clinical sign of an infection. On day, 49 an exanthema was documented on both arms and hands with conflating plaques. Dermatological examination judged it to be a potentially life-threatening reaction, and a prednisolone therapy was prescribed with 0.5 mg/kg. Leucocytes and eosinophils were in the normal range (7.8/nL, 1% eosinophils); body temperature reached a maximum of 37.5°C. No lymphadenopathy was documented. Both clozapine and sertraline were simultaneously discontinued on day 49 of the clozapine therapy, and the patient was treated with electroconvulsive therapy further on. Five weeks after discontinuation of clozapine, liver enzymes and CRP were within normal range and the cutaneous reaction had abated. The case was rated as a probable adverse drug reaction in the sense of an incomplete clozapine-induced DRESS. With elevated liver enzymes and skin reaction as leading symptoms, the patient had 2 most common DRESS symptoms [2], but no eosinophilia, fever, and lymphadenopathy. An alternative explanation would be a sertraline-induced DRESS, which was marked as a possible alternative. However, immunological reactions are much more often side effects of clozapine than of sertraline, and DRESS has not been reported with sertraline so far ([Table 2]).

Table 2 Case 3: liver enzymes, CRP, and medications (dosage and blood levels).

Day of clozapine treatment

1

5

44

49

50

53

66

85

111

Reference levels

Clozapine dosage

6.25 mg

200 mg

175 mg

Pause

Pause

Pause

Pause

Pause

Pause

Clozapine level (ng/L)

350–600

-

782

-

1551

-

432

-

-

-

Clozapine DM (ng/mg)

-

271

-

336

-

157

-

-

-

ALT (U/L)

<35

22

194

-

1511

1413

1076

102

23

14

AST (U/L)

<35

21

144

-

932

836

414

42

18

18

GGT (U/L)

<40

23

58

-

292

279

287

289

119

55

Sertraline dosage

50 mg

150 mg

150 mg

Pause

Pause

Pause

Pause

-

-

CRP mg/dL

<0.5

-

5.14

-

17.4

1.93

<0.5

-

-


#
#

Conclusion

So far to our knowledge, there is only 1 case report in the literature that describes DRESS in patients being administered clozapine therapy. Ben-Ari et al. have described 1 case report of a DRESS in a patient receiving clozapine and phenytoine, in which both drugs were quickly discontinued. The antiepileptic phenytoine was suspected to cause the DRESS, so clozapine was restarted, but a few days later, the patient’s condition deteriorated further, and clozapine was discontinued again [6].

We present 3 additional cases. In 2 cases RegiSCAR criteria for a DRESS were met. In the third case, an incomplete DRESS was documented. In our first case, clozapine was assessed to have definitely caused DRESS, for after low dose re-exposure the patient promptly showed slightly eosinophilia and CRP ascent again. In the second case, the patient had edema, eosinophilia, and elevated liver enzymes under 200 mg clozapine in monotherapy, which implicates clozapine as a probable inductor of the DRESS. In our third case, liver enzymes elevation and skin exanthema, as well as CRP elevation, were described in the patient receiving clozapine and sertraline. Immunological reactions are much more often to be found with patients who are administered clozapine than in patients who receive sertraline, so we regard clozapine as a probable and sertraline a possible inductor. Alternatively, it could be possible that both drugs contributed to the development of the symptoms. In 2 of our 3 cases, clozapine levels were in the toxic range despite normal dosages: pharmacogenetic tests for eventual polymorphism of cytochrom P450 1A2 were not performed. In both cases, CRP was massively increased at the same time, and it is possible that release of cytokines during the immunological inflammatory process led to the rise in clozapine levels, as cytokines are known to inhibit clozapine metabolism via the inhibition of cytochrome 450 1 A2 [7]. Two out of the 3 patients were treated with corticosteroids and all ceased taking clozapine. Under this therapy regime, the patients achieved a complete remission.

In general, unwanted drug effects as a cause of medical disorders often remain undetected. DRESS in particular appears to be difficult to recognize: since DRESS involves very different symptoms of various organ systems, it is possible that in clinical routine not all symptoms are noticed and not subsumed to this complex, and therefore DRESS remains unrecognized. However, since the disease is severe and the consequences can be dramatic, it is important to know about the possibility of DRESS due to drugs in order to intervene quickly, if so necessary.

DRESS must be recognized promptly and the causative drug withdrawn. It has been reported that the earlier the drug is withdrawn, the better the prognosis [8].

DRESS is mostly seen and described in patients receiving rheumatologic or anticonvulsant drugs but very rarely in psychiatric hospitals, where clozapine is frequently used. It is the aim of this report to alert psychiatrists to this rare but severe adverse drug reaction of clozapine.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

S. Toto is a project manager of AMSP, has been a member of an advisory board for Otsouka and has received speaker´s honoria from Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsouka and Servier

  • References

  • 1 Thongsri T, Chularojanamontri L, Pichler WJ. Cardiac involvement in DRESS syndrome. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2017; 35: 3-10
  • 2 Cacoub P, Musette P, Descamps V. et al The DRESS syndrome: A literature review. Am J Med 2011; 124: 588-597
  • 3 Pereira de Silva N, Piquioni P, Kochen S, Saidon P. Risk factors associated with DRESS syndrome produced by aromatic and non-aromatic antipiletic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 67: 463-470
  • 4 Shiohara T, Inaoka M, Kano Y. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS): A reaction induced by a complex interplay among herpesviruses and antiviral and antidrug immune responses. Allergol Int 2006; 55: 1-8
  • 5 Buck ML. DRESS syndrome: Examples from the pediatric literature. Pediatric Pharmacotherapy 2012; 18: 11
  • 6 Ben-Ari K, Goldberg I, Shirazi I. et al. An unusual case of DRESS syndrome. Dermatol Case Rep 2008; 2: 39-42
  • 7 Haack MJ, Bak ML, Beurrskens R. et al. Toxic rise of clozapine plasma concentrations in relation to inflammation. Euro Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 13: 381-385
  • 8 Santiago F, Goncalo M, Vieira R. et al. Epicutaneous patch testing in drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS). Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62: 47-53

Correspondence

Bruna Sanader
Department of Psychiatry
Ludwig Maximilian University
Nussbaumstraße 7
80336 Munich
Germany   

  • References

  • 1 Thongsri T, Chularojanamontri L, Pichler WJ. Cardiac involvement in DRESS syndrome. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2017; 35: 3-10
  • 2 Cacoub P, Musette P, Descamps V. et al The DRESS syndrome: A literature review. Am J Med 2011; 124: 588-597
  • 3 Pereira de Silva N, Piquioni P, Kochen S, Saidon P. Risk factors associated with DRESS syndrome produced by aromatic and non-aromatic antipiletic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 67: 463-470
  • 4 Shiohara T, Inaoka M, Kano Y. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS): A reaction induced by a complex interplay among herpesviruses and antiviral and antidrug immune responses. Allergol Int 2006; 55: 1-8
  • 5 Buck ML. DRESS syndrome: Examples from the pediatric literature. Pediatric Pharmacotherapy 2012; 18: 11
  • 6 Ben-Ari K, Goldberg I, Shirazi I. et al. An unusual case of DRESS syndrome. Dermatol Case Rep 2008; 2: 39-42
  • 7 Haack MJ, Bak ML, Beurrskens R. et al. Toxic rise of clozapine plasma concentrations in relation to inflammation. Euro Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 13: 381-385
  • 8 Santiago F, Goncalo M, Vieira R. et al. Epicutaneous patch testing in drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS). Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62: 47-53